Hello again,
Is there a way in smtpd(8) yet, to do something like genericstables in
sendmail? Right now, when my client sendmail sends out a mail, it
rewrites the envelope and the From addresses to be valid email addresses
with the domain that I want tacked on to the username. I couldn't
find
On 5/31/2009 5:10 PM, Aaron Stellman wrote:
in case your resolver fails to resolve 209.147.117.6 ->
mail16.websecurestores.com,
/[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*/ will successfully match
"209.147.117.6"
Ah, that makes sense now. That rule was the one triggering as well.
Thanks!
You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend !
.
You can pick up your postcard at the following web address:
.
Click here to pick up your postcard
.
If you can't click on the web address above, you can also
visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/
and enter your
On 5/31/09, Ben Goren wrote:
> On 2009 May 30, at 7:03 AM, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 06:48:59AM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
>>> I'm trying to set up my first wireless network, with less than
>>> stellar
>>> success.
>>
>> You need to narrow your spectrum of diagnosis. Start ruli
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 03:20:09PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
> I have an OpenBSD 4.2 system running milter-regex 1.6. As part of the
> milter-regex rules, I have:
>
> # reject things that look like they might come from a dynamic address
> reject "Looks like a dynamic address"
> connect /[0-9]
On 2009-05-31, Steve Shockley wrote:
> I have an OpenBSD 4.2 system running milter-regex 1.6. As part of the
> milter-regex rules, I have:
>
> # reject things that look like they might come from a dynamic address
> reject "Looks like a dynamic address"
> connect /[0-9][0-9]*\-[0-9][0-9]*\-[0-9][
I have an OpenBSD 4.2 system running milter-regex 1.6. As part of the
milter-regex rules, I have:
# reject things that look like they might come from a dynamic address
reject "Looks like a dynamic address"
connect /[0-9][0-9]*\-[0-9][0-9]*\-[0-9][0-9]*/ //
connect /[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 1:58 PM, (private) HKS wrote:
> I have two networks: an office and a datacenter. The office has a
> single router (dmesg below) that I upgraded to 4.5 today. The
> datacenter has two routers running 4.4. The datacenter routers share a
> CARP address. The locations communica
I have two networks: an office and a datacenter. The office has a
single router (dmesg below) that I upgraded to 4.5 today. The
datacenter has two routers running 4.4. The datacenter routers share a
CARP address. The locations communicate over a gif tunnel protected by
IPsec.
After upgrading to 4.
On 2009-05-28, Georg Kahest wrote:
> Hello, i have strange problem with my Carp/Pfsync, when i manualy
> failover via carpdemote or ifconfig carpX down, then the failover works
> okey, it even works okey when one box goes down, but when the prefered
> master comes up again and starts to act as car
On 2009-05-31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> Uhm. The tunnel endpoints and the gre src and dest IPs are the same. I
>> have a bad feeling about that.
>
> ahh, changing that gets me a lot further, thanks. gre's nasty hack
> to toggle the address's LSB isn't quite enough then; not a problem.
>
>> Addit
On 2009-05-31, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 01:13:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2009-05-31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > On 2009-05-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> OSPF over gre's or gif's (which can then themselves be protected by
>> >> ipsec) is probably t
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 01:13:25PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2009-05-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >>
> >> OSPF over gre's or gif's (which can then themselves be protected by
> >> ipsec) is probably the fastest option at present on OpenBSD.
> >
On 2009-05-31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-05-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>>
>> OSPF over gre's or gif's (which can then themselves be protected by
>> ipsec) is probably the fastest option at present on OpenBSD.
>
> Hrmm. And then I try it...
>
> Does anyone actually have this working and i
On 2009-05-29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> OSPF over gre's or gif's (which can then themselves be protected by
> ipsec) is probably the fastest option at present on OpenBSD.
Hrmm. And then I try it...
Does anyone actually have this working and if so would they mind
sharing config? I'm seeing the
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:56 AM, David Vasek wrote:
> On Sat, 30 May 2009, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>> Attempting to boot my Thinkstation S10 with a cd made from
>> amd64/install45.iso results in
>>
>> uhci3: host system error
>> uhci3: host controller process error
>> uhci3: host controller halted
>
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Kagamine Len wrote:
> Hi. I wonder if anybody is working on AR2425 support? I got a eee pc with
one of
> those cards, everything works fine but wireless. I got kernel panic in
> ar5k_channel() (ar5xxx.c:1110), so I tried to add ar2425-specific channel
> setting fu
On Sat, 30 May 2009 18:15:42 -0700
Ben Goren wrote:
> On 2009 May 30, at 5:05 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 08:01:49PM -0400, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
> >> Hello SMTPD Gurus,
> >>
> >> I have noticed some TLS based authentication stuff in the
> >> smtpd.conf(5)
> >> man pa
On 2009-05-31, Ben Goren wrote:
> On 2009 May 30, at 5:05 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 08:01:49PM -0400, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
>>> Hello SMTPD Gurus,
>>>
>>> I have noticed some TLS based authentication stuff in the
>>> smtpd.conf(5)
>>> man page. I don't see more details
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Donald Allen wrote:
Attempting to boot my Thinkstation S10 with a cd made from
amd64/install45.iso results in
uhci3: host system error
uhci3: host controller process error
uhci3: host controller halted
The machine has a quad-core Intel processor, 4 Gb memory, 2 146 Gb SAS
20 matches
Mail list logo
