Hi,
I get this cvs output whils checking out stable source
cvs checkout: warning: server is not creating directories one at a time
is this ok?
thanks
--Siju
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 17:00]:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer >wrote:
> > > * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > > > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255
> (this is
> > > > carp IP
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-08-13, Nice Daemon wrote:
> > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
>
> that's definitely wrong, you ended up setting your broadcast address t
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> Or in /usr/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs; make ps and you have it nicely
> formatted in postscript.
>
Thanks a million Luis, Jan and Otto.
--Siju
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >> On 2009-08-06, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
> >> > I'm trying to use cvs rdiff command in some files but I'm getting error:
> >>
> >> Tr
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 04:12:27PM -0400, stan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:54:37PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM, stan wrote:
> > > We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5.
> > >
> >
> > upgrades are supported fromrelease to
Hi Stuart, Marco & misc@,
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:08:05 +0700, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
On 2009-08-13, Insan Praja SW wrote:
How do I migrate from 14
August 2009 current to 4.6 Release/Current?.
libraries have been bumped since the 4.6 release w
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:31:39PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > I'm suspecting that syntax b (interface)b in pf.conf only
> > resolves to the IPv4 addresses of the interface.
> wrong.
Right, thanks for this terse answer Henning (:
I investigated further, and found the cause of my problems to
On 2009-08-13, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> When investigating I see 80-90% of the CPU time is because of interupts.
> Almost all interrupts are for the rl0 and rl1 interface.
>
> The interrupt load is not coupled to bandwith usage, we can use 60Mbit
> without any problems.
> I know rl(4) cards are
On 2009-08-13, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> How do I migrate from 14
> August 2009 current to 4.6 Release/Current?.
libraries have been bumped since the 4.6 release was tagged. if you're
having to ask how to do this, you're probably in the situation where
On 2009-08-13, Nice Daemon wrote:
> inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
that's definitely wrong, you ended up setting your broadcast address to
255.255.255.255 instead of setting the netmask.
most likely you got b
I'd recommend you to upgrade one last time about 2 weeks from now to a
snapshot. Currently there is a hackathon in progress and stability
might be in flux.
Don't go back; it'll be pretty painful with pkg and stuff.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:42:26AM +0700, Insan Praja SW wrote:
> Hi Misc@,
> I'm
Hi Misc@,
I'm planning on moving my 4.6-current to 4.6 release/stable, simply
because I need to slow my self down since everytime there are fixes/commit
to current source tree, I'm tempted to re-compile my kernel & userland,
reboot and its not favorable to the company I work for. So I'm simp
Hello,My router is a OpenBSD 4.5 stable box and serves internet connection
for a lab with 20 machines.
The problem is internet connection from the lab or from the gateway are too
slow, downloads in average 7KB/s.
Downloading the same files with a Mac OS X box and Linux, the mimimum I get
is 400KB/s
* Olivier Mehani [2009-08-13 17:28]:
> I'm
> suspecting that syntax b (interface)b in pf.conf only resolves to the
> IPv4 addresses of the interface.
wrong.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servi
Hello list,
I read in pf.conf(5),
b When the interface name is surrounded by parentheses, the rule is
automatically updated whenever the interface changes its address.b
I know this works well for IPv4 addresses, where b (sis0)b will resolve
to the addresses of sis0. However, I'm working on an
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 17:00]:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
> > it might be after my hint, but you
Hi Henning,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> > inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> > carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
>
> it might be after my hint, but you didn't follow my advice.
I
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:33]:
> inet xx.yyy.253.225 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 (this is
> carp IP in upstream VLAN, AFTER your hint)
it might be after my hint, but you didn't follow my advice. you want
netmask 0x there. aka /32. aka 255.255.255.255.
--
Henning Brau
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 09:45:17AM -0400, Luis Useche wrote:
> I can recommend some papers and books I know for theory as well as
> programming.
>
> Papers (you can find them on the internet):
> "A fast file system for UNIX" by McKusick, a clasic one.
Or in /usr/share/doc/smm/05.fastfs; make ps
Hi Henning,
thanks, that fixed that issue.
However, I don't think that the routes/networks are messed up:
inet 10.10.0.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.10.0.255 (this is backend
server VLAN)
inet 10.20.30.11 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.20.30.255 (this is for
pfsync)
inet xx.yyy.254.231 netm
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Siju George wrote:
> > Could Some one recommend good books on File Systems and File System
> > Programming Please?
On Aug 13 09:45:17, Luis Useche wrote:
> "A fast file system for UNIX" by McKusick, a clasic one.
> "The design and implementation of the Log-struc
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:54:37PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM, stan wrote:
> > We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5.
> >
>
> upgrades are supported fromrelease to release so
> 4.2 > 4.3 > 4.4 > 4.5
OK, so I am sloppy with my wor
* Nice Daemon [2009-08-13 16:04]:
> Hi list,
>
> getting nearer to the point of deployment of a really nice relayd/pf/pfsync
> setup I came across an issue.
>
> I'd like to run ntpd to syncronize against ntp servers that are in our
> network.
>
> However, it only works on the machine with *acti
I can recommend some papers and books I know for theory as well as
programming.
Papers (you can find them on the internet):
"A fast file system for UNIX" by McKusick, a clasic one.
"The design and implementation of the Log-structured File System" by
Rosenblum
"An Implementation of a Log- Structure
Hi list,
getting nearer to the point of deployment of a really nice relayd/pf/pfsync
setup I came across an issue.
I'd like to run ntpd to syncronize against ntp servers that are in our
network.
However, it only works on the machine with *active* carp interface(s).
On the machine with carp inte
Hi,
Could Some one recommend good books on File Systems and File System
Programming Please?
Thanks
Siju
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:33 PM, stan wrote:
> We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5.
>
upgrades are supported fromrelease to release so
4.2 > 4.3 > 4.4 > 4.5
--Sij
We are in the process of upgrading a number of machines from 4.2 to 4.5.
The development machine we have running 4.5 seems to be exhibiting a
different behavior vis a vi rwhod. rwhod runs, and when I run it in debug
mode, I see it recognizing other machines on the same subnet. But it fails
to repor
Hi misc,
I'me very sorry to reply to the misc list in my native language.
The reply was not intended to be send to misc. Did a group reply instead
of reply.
Sorry.
Robert
/me will burn in hell
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:00:40PM +0200, Robert Blacquiere wrote:
> Hi Wijnand,
>
>
> On T
Hi Wijnand,
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45:43AM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
>
> Op 13 aug 2009, om 11:38 heeft Robert Blacquiere het volgende
> geschreven:
>
>> Hi Wijnand,
>>
>> Having fun @ HAR? :)
> Hell yeah! ;-)
>
>>
>> You could try using polling(4) for the rl cards. This could ease
>>
Op 13 aug 2009, om 11:38 heeft Robert Blacquiere het volgende
geschreven:
Hi Wijnand,
Having fun @ HAR? :)
Hell yeah! ;-)
You could try using polling(4) for the rl cards. This could ease
interrupts a bit.
There is no polling(4).
# man polling
man: no entry for polling in the manual.
Hi,
I've recently (yesterday) compiled new GENERIC kernel and it have
difficulties while detecting and using my rtw card. I have two laptops
running the same kernel:
- IBM 240x - rtw works fine with 4.5 but there are bad Vcc requests
with 4.6:
cbb0: bad Vcc request. sock_ctrl 0x0, sock_status 0
Hi Wijnand,
Having fun @ HAR? :)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a machine with only a 500Mhz VIA cpu as NAT/IPSEC gateway
> here at the har2009.org camp.
> Sometimes the internet is hardly usable, loadavg spikes up to 14. When
> investiga
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:52:28 +0200
Jan Stary wrote:
[...]
> Does aucat somehow 'divide' the signal strengths when playing multiple
> inputs (even when some are paused)? Similarly to sox(1) mixing files?
>
> Trying the same with more than two clients (such as, five paused mplayers
> and one playin
Hi,
I am using a machine with only a 500Mhz VIA cpu as NAT/IPSEC gateway
here at the har2009.org camp.
Sometimes the internet is hardly usable, loadavg spikes up to 14.
When investigating I see 80-90% of the CPU time is because of interupts.
Almost all interrupts are for the rl0 and rl1 in
4.6-current on a HP EliteBook 8530w. I cannot get xterm
to let me type some iso8859-2 (Czech) characters.
For testing purposes, I removed my ~/.xinitrc and ~/.Xresources,
to start from the bottom up. Running `startx' gets me into fvwm
and launches an xterm, as is the default. From that xterm, I ru
First off, thanks to alex@ for all the work being put into aucat.
OpenBSD 4.5 is the first operating system where I can easily do
multitrack recording in base.
My situation is this: aucat -l is running, and I play two different
copies of an album in two mplayers: a ripped vinyl and a CD reissue,
p
Hello,
I use OpenBGPd and Pf to make some traffic shapping (see :
http://blog.oav.net/dotclear/index.php?post/2007/01/19/32-traffic-shapping-avec-openbsd-pf-altq-et-openbgpd)
, but I don't find yet the good way to tell PF to keep my "bgp" table
to be up to date ?
In fact I do just a bgpctl c
Thanks a lot for taking so much time to answer my mail, especially so fast and
in such details.
You are tarnishing the OpenBSD reputation in a nice way :) wink :)
- Mail Original -
De: "Nick Holland"
C: artligh...@free.fr
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
EnvoyC): Jeudi 13 AoC;t 2009 04h30:05 GMT +01:
Hello,
Thanks a lot, but this is not the problem, dual-graphics is disabled.
Here are the settings I'm using in the bios, under CONFIG - DISPLAY:
Default Primary Video Device: Internal (alternative is PCI-Express)
Boot Display Device: ThinkPad LCD (alternative is Analog VGA)
Graphics Device: Integ
Hai,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:50 PM, William
French wrote:
> udl0 at uhub5 port 4 "DisplayLink nanovision MiMo" rev 2.00/0.07 addr 5
> wsdisplay1 at udl0 mux 1
> wsdisplay1: screen 0 added (std, vt100 emulation)
So theres 2 things you could do to test this:
a) Get a console running on it as a t
hmm, on Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:44:21AM +0200, Jan Stary said that
> On Aug 13 02:33:09, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i welcome everyone reading this mail with the hollywood plot like
> > subject line.
> >
> > here's what's happening, plain and simple: during the upgrade process,
43 matches
Mail list logo
