On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:46:11PM -0400, My List Mail wrote:
Been waiting for a while to see some current encryption added to
openbsd. Surprised it has not been already, and frankly find it weak
that the 'worlds most secure OS' does not have current encryption. Why
is this?
I use vnconfig
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 01:00:05PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
Hi,
Could I rewrite as-paths in bgpd? I.e. if I have an incoming as-path
like this:
1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
and would like for some reason to rewrite it like: 1 2 3 4, or
1 2 3 3 4, can I do this?
No. You're not
On 2009-08-27, My List Mail emaillistem...@gmail.com wrote:
I use vnconfig for encryption, which uses Blowfish.
softraid(4) crypto uses AES.
I am new into pf configuration and I am curious if it is possible to add
some host into table in firewall rules if some conditions are met (not
if they are broken). I was thinking about some way to prevent port
scanning of machine and what came to me as obvious way to do it is this
(in some
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Ivan Radovanovicriv...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new into pf configuration and I am curious if it is possible to add
some host into table in firewall rules if some conditions are met (not
if they are broken). I was thinking about some way to prevent port
scanning
Girish Venkatachalam napisa:
Please read up on pf(4) anchors.
And also on connection overloads in pf.conf(5).
Stuff like max-conn-rate and so on.
You already said you know about pf(4) tables. You need to populate the tables
based on different criteria. I know that connection overload is one.
I read somewhere [1] on misc@ that softraid-crypto is still considered
experimental.
Can one of developers confirm that in 4.6 it will be safe to use it in
production?
Actually I would like to use crypto on top of RAID 1 (both softraid) -
good/bad idea?
(before anyone asks: backups are in
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovicriv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your respone. If I understand you correctly pf kernel module
actually supports operating with tables based on positive conditions (ie not
only when rule is broken, but also when rule is true), and the way to
Girish Venkatachalam napisa:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ivan Radovanovicriv...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your respone. If I understand you correctly pf kernel module
actually supports operating with tables based on positive conditions (ie not
only when rule is broken, but also when
Hi misc@,
just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest snapshot. I
didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of days. Is this a normal
behaviour? My .tmux.conf is below:
--.tmux.conf--
set-option -g status-bg default
set-option -g status-fg black
set-option -g message-bg yellow
Hi,
I'm using OpenBSD 4.5-stable, and I'm trying to configure RADIUS
authentication. What I want is for the system to try the
RADIUS server,
and if it fails, fall back to the local password file. In
login.conf I have
auth-defaults:auth=radius,passwd:radius-server=my.radius.server
If
Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest
snapshot. I didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of
days. Is this a normal behaviour?
Works fine here. Are you sure you ran make depend all or make
clean all? Otherwises changes in tmux.h won't propagate
Hi,
I dimly remember seeing a short thread flowing by that mentions
someone's hacks to bsd.rd to arrive at an installation system that
works w/o human intervention, but can't seem to find it anymore.
Pointers are greatly appreciated!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
Su servicio de correo no permite lectura de Html
por favor visite http://www.revistad.com.mx/06/
para ver el contenido de este mensaje.
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had
a name of edi06-RD.jpg]
Hi,
On Tue, 09.06.2009 at 15:52:55 -0400, Bryan Allen b...@mirrorshades.net wrote:
My suggestion would be to move all your services to run under runit or
daemontools. You can manage both with Puppet. I'm not familiar with runit,
really, but I've used daemontools for years, quite happily, on
Hi list,
I m experiencing random freezes with few T22 fairly old laptops.
I know those have crazy bios with few bugs.
I tried a jump at UKC then disabled the acpi with no effect.
I disabled the power mangement for cpu and pci bus with no more
luke.
I ve been amused to discover at last boot the
Hi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:00:54AM +, Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
Hi misc@,
just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest snapshot. I
didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of days. Is this a normal
behaviour? My .tmux.conf is below:
--.tmux.conf--
set-option -g
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Han Boetes wrote:
Daniel Bolgheroni wrote:
just noticed the status bar of tmux gone with the latest
snapshot. I didn't followed the cvs entries for a couple of
days. Is this a normal behaviour?
Works fine here. Are you sure you ran make depend all or make
clean
Sorry for the noise. My messages don't seem to be getting to the list.
--
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.
I am using OpenBSD 4.5
When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I
get an error:
can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied
Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root or TrustedUser.
Searching for this, I have found in various places many different
G'day,
I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this
question. I want to host a sftp server and there could be
thousands of accounts, although not all used at once. I was
wondering if there is a limit to the number of user accounts
I can create on a machine? I had originally thought
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:15:50PM -0400, stan wrote:
I am still fiighting with Amanda on 4.5 It seems to invoke dump as follows:
/sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a
Which reesults in the follwing error:
$ /sbin/dump dump 0usf 1048576 - /dev/rwd0a | cat /tmp/foo
dump: density is
--- Stuart VanZee [Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0400]: ---
I am using OpenBSD 4.5
When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I
get an error:
can not chdir(/var/spool/mqueue/): Permission denied
Program mode requires special privileges, e.g., root or TrustedUser.
what
From: John Cosimano
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Openbsd Misc (E-mail)
Subject: Re: mail issue
--- Stuart VanZee [Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:55:39AM -0400]: ---
I am using OpenBSD 4.5
When I try to use mail to send email from a user account I
get an error:
can not
Hi Toni
Is it this one you are thinking of ?
http://nbender.com/install.netboot/install.html
Kind regards
Sxren Aurehxj
Den 27/08/2009 kl. 17.53 skrev Toni Mueller:
Hi,
I dimly remember seeing a short thread flowing by that mentions
someone's hacks to bsd.rd to arrive at an installation
Brad Tilley wrote:
They still have mainframes.
Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption, see for example
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP100810
-pu
As long as you can deal with the limitations then it is fine. The
really big one being unable to change the password.
Stacking RAID sets can be done but isn't a good idea. We are debating
options but no decision has been made.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:59:58PM +0200, Robert wrote:
I read
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400
Morris, Roy rmor...@internetsecure.com wrote:
G'day,
I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this
question. I want to host a sftp server and there could be
thousands of accounts, although not all used at once. I was
wondering if there is a
img file
Please add customerserv...@jenjobs.net to your address book to ensure job
alerts
and updates are sent directly to your Inbox!
JenJOBS.com Logo
Dear Friend,
Whether you are an employer with a vacancy to advertise or a job seeker
looking for your first or next job, JenJOBS.com can help!
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, puuselpa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad Tilley wrote:
They still have mainframes.
Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption [snip]
Yes, my point exactly. Those mainframes *still* support plain, old
DES. Read the link you sent.
I don't think it's off topic but others might. I'm writing this post to
remember Chuck Yerkes, a long time contributor to the m...@openbsd list.
Chuck died 5 years ago today while riding his motorcycle.
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT
2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier
versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS?
From /etc/fstab:
/dev/wd0a / ffs ro 1 1
swap /dev mfs
Brad Tilley wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:22 PM, puuselpa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad Tilley wrote:
They still have mainframes.
Sure. And mainframes have very good encryption [snip]
Yes, my point exactly. Those mainframes *still* support plain, old
DES. Read the link you sent.
Unless I
Thank you both, Miod and Soeren - I think I was actually after the link
Soeren posted, but didn't think that it was that long ago already.
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
excellent thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Robert [mailto:rob...@openbsd.pap.st]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 2:53 PM
To: Morris, Roy
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: SFTP - Max Users
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400
Morris, Roy rmor...@internetsecure.com wrote:
G'day,
I
I have 2 4.5 machine functioning as a bridge between 2 physical locations.
I have teh 4.6. rwhod daemon running on both.
I'm running the 4.6 version because it appears that teh 4.5 version is a
listner only. All teh macines at both ends (Linux FreeBSD, HP-UX and
OpenBSD) are all running rwhod.
Those limitations are ok.
You said it isn't a good idea; is there a possibility for data loss or
will it just be slow an ugly hack?
So what would currently (4.6) be a sane way to have an encrypted disk
mirrored?
(no hardware raid, except if someone gives me the hardware for free...)
*
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:35 PM, puuselpa.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I misunderstood, you seem to imply that using a mainframe means you
*need* to use weak encryption. That's wrong.
Yes, you misunderstand. Financial institutions use DES today because
of backward compatibility. They've been
Robert wrote:
Number of local user accounts is liminted by the available user id's.
Since that's a 16 bit limit and if you stick to the 'from uid 1000 up'
rule, that'd leave you with 64536 possible accounts.
Hi,
Thats wrong, uid_t and gid_t are 32-bit unsigned integers on at least i386.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Lars Noodenlars.cura...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT
2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier
versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS?
...
$ cat /etc/fstab
I know this topic has been touched on before but I have what I believe is a
simple question.
Instead of creating a SASL password db and having to keep two password
databases in check I want SASL to use OpenBSD's password file. There's no
definitive answer so I want to try and put it out there.
Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina napisa:
You could also take a look at the match, tag and tagged keywords in
pf.conf.
Additionally, you may require parsing your custom logs (pflogN
interfaces or binary logs in /var/log/) in order to populate your
tables for use in the main ruleset or anchors.
Have a
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:43:34 -0400
Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert wrote:
Number of local user accounts is liminted by the available user
id's. Since that's a 16 bit limit and if you stick to the 'from uid
1000 up' rule, that'd leave you with 64536 possible accounts.
Hi,
Thats
Not sure what unix you're running, over here, uid_t is 32bit.
Penned by Robert on 20090827 20:52.31, we have:
| On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:23:18 -0400
| Morris, Roy rmor...@internetsecure.com wrote:
|
| G'day,
| I searched around but couldn't find a simple answer to this
| question. I want
On 2009-08-27, Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6-current (GENERIC) #125: Tue Aug 25 06:13:48 MDT
2009 on an i386 and notice that mfs seems different than earlier
versions. What have I missed in mounting /dev ram using MFS?
From /etc/fstab:
/dev/wd0a /
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Nicholas Marriott wrote:
This is probably because the behaviour changed a while ago so reverse is no
longer in the default status-attr and message-attr, so this now sets the
colours to black on black.
Change these it should be fine (I guess you want green on black?).
pppd: PPP device not available.
Why?
--
4625
Johan SANCHEZ wrote:
Hi list,
I m experiencing random freezes with few T22 fairly old laptops.
I know those have crazy bios with few bugs.
I tried a jump at UKC then disabled the acpi with no effect.
I disabled the power mangement for cpu and pci bus with no more
luke.
I think you are going
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 6:59 PM, 46254625...@gmail.com wrote:
pppd: PPP device not available.
Why?
Hmm, I don't see that message in pppd on an OpenBSD 4.6 system. Or
rather, I only see it in the source as the beginning of a much longer
message that describes what your next steps should be, so
49 matches
Mail list logo
