Hi
I've just upgraded a couple of (old-ish) servers to 4.6 and now Apache has
started throwing intermittent segfaults on both. (dmesgs appended below)
I previously upgraded from 4.4 to 4.5 without incident.
Both of these machines have been running faultlessly for months without issue
so
4.6 or -current is working fine in VirtualBox too but still some weird things :
1) X use vesa driver
2) If you switch from one console to another then your console will be
with somewhat red/brown background
3) If you reboot then during boot your OpenBSD will stop on mtrr(4)
driver. if you just
After reading this
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=mpbiosapropos=0sektion=0manpa
th=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386format=html
I must say that for me it means that if you have crappy HW (in this
case KVM) then you can encounter problems.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Chris Dukes
On 1/11/2009, at 5:27 PM, Jeremy Bowen wrote:
Hi
I've just upgraded a couple of (old-ish) servers to 4.6 and now
Apache has
started throwing intermittent segfaults on both. (dmesgs appended
below)
I previously upgraded from 4.4 to 4.5 without incident.
Both of these machines have been
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:42:58AM +0100, Michiel van Baak wrote:
On 19:20, Fri 30 Oct 09, Toni Mueller wrote:
Thanks, John and Michiel,
On Thu, 29.10.2009 at 14:02:27 +0100, Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.info wrote:
On 12:18, Thu 29 Oct 09, Toni Mueller wrote:
I'm running kvm
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:52:06AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Joachim Schipper
joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote:
[My (Joachim's) message, snipped by Brat:
Encrypting just /home is dangerous. Do you know where vi(1) keeps its
backup files? Are you *sure* that's the
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 09:36:40AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:52:06AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Joachim Schipper
joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote:
[My (Joachim's) message, snipped by Brat:
On Nov 1, 2009, at 1:12 AM, Toma Bod ar wrote:
I don't know if you find one document about PF, but here it is
http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/ same author wrote book about PF.
Yup. That's one of the books I read -- but pf seems to have moved
since then. Thanks for the link to this major
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
no need for that, we have automatic skip steps, and a ruleset
optimizer that re-orders where it makes sense.
see the 3 articles on undeadly about pf for some fundamentals,
starting here;
On Oct 31, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Ryan McBride wrote:
I can't speak for the books, and I KNOW google is full of lies, but
can
you point out specifically what parts of the website docs and man page
talks about this? It should be removed.
After going through the replies I've received, I'm thinking
On Oct 31, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
Bad idea. pf is not iptables. Read FAQ for examples, and start from
scratch using tricks from those examples, not from iptables.
My biggest problem seems to have been total ignorance of the depth of
the optimizer. I didn't see much in the way
hi folks,
i need to mount in chroot some read-only data and looking for analogue
of:
mount --bind -o ro
for OpenBSD.
could you please advise?
thanks,
sda
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:03:46 +0300, sda wrote:
hi folks,
i need to mount in chroot some read-only data and looking for analogue
of:
mount --bind -o ro
for OpenBSD.
could you please advise?
thanks,
sda
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-09/0198.html
*** NOTE *** Please DO
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:03:46PM +0300, sda wrote:
hi folks,
i need to mount in chroot some read-only data and looking for analogue
of:
mount --bind -o ro
for OpenBSD.
could you please advise?
The closest equivalent I'm aware of involves mounting an NFS share from
localhost.
Richard Toohey wrote:
[cut]
Can't help you directly, but there are a few questions that might help
...
1. Upgraded as per instructions -
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade46.html?
Yes, followed the instructions to the letter. Everything else upgraded
successfully and is working as
On 12:22, Sun 01 Nov 09, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 02:03:46PM +0300, sda wrote:
hi folks,
i need to mount in chroot some read-only data and looking for analogue
of:
mount --bind -o ro
for OpenBSD.
could you please advise?
The closest equivalent
Maybe a Suhosin issue...
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: ports
Changes by: rob...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/07/20 10:30:14
Modified files:
www/php5 : Makefile.inc www/php5/core : Makefile www/php5/extensions:
Makefile Added files:
www/php5/core/patches: patch-ext_suhosin_suhosin_c
Log message:
Make
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Joachim Schipper
joac...@joachimschipper.nl wrote:
I can't tell whether you miss the point or are arguing that a 90%
solution is good enough.
I understand that when I do this *only* /home is encrypted. The title
says it all, right?
In the first case: try it.
#x8ED2;#x8F45;#x7406; #x4E8B;#xFF1A;#x2605;#x60A8;
#x597D;#xFF01;#x2605;#x56E1;#x6211;#x53F8;#x73FE;#x6709;#x591A;#x7A2E;#x3010;#x767C;*#x2169;
*#x7968;#x3011;#x53EF;#x5411;#x5916;#x512A;#x60E0;#x4EE3;#x958B;#xFF0C;#x4EE3;
#x958B; #x7BC4;
OpenBSD 4.6 i386 seems quite happy in VirtualBox 3.0.10 r54097 (Fedora
11 i686 as a host).
No funnies at all, just boot the cd46.iso image and ftp install and no
issues whatsoever (SMP and non-SMP VMs).
2009/11/1 TomC!E! BodEC!r tomas.bod...@gmail.com:
After reading this
On 2009-11-01, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez gonz...@sepp0.com.ar wrote:
Maybe a Suhosin issue...
This is almost certainly the problem.
Just, put suhosin.session.encrypt=off in you php.ini and check out.
That will get you going for now, but -stable ports has a newer version
of PHP and the Suhosin
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
no need for that, we have automatic skip steps, and a ruleset
optimizer that re-orders where it makes sense.
Well, I'll be damned. The pf optimizer actually works! If I order the
rules properly and put in enough info into them that pf can
* Jeremy Bowen jer...@smartpoint.co.nz [2009-11-01 07:23]:
I've just upgraded a couple of (old-ish) servers to 4.6 and now Apache has
started throwing intermittent segfaults on both. (dmesgs appended below)
I have the following PHP5 modules loaded in /var/www/conf/php5/*.ini
yyou need to
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:16:10PM -0700, ghe wrote:
On Oct 31, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
no need for that, we have automatic skip steps, and a ruleset
optimizer that re-orders where it makes sense.
Well, I'll be damned. The pf optimizer actually works! If I order the
Hi
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 05:09:21PM -0500, Matthew Young wrote:
Iam very curious about your problem, we all fear encountering
something similar in the future...
Why wasnt anybody able to help out based on your DDB trace ? If I
ever get such event what is the best information then that
On 11/1/2009, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez gonz...@sepp0.com.ar wrote:
Maybe a Suhosin issue...
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: ports
Changes by: rob...@cvs.openbsd.org 2009/07/20 10:30:14
Modified files:
www/php5 : Makefile.inc www/php5/core : Makefile www/php5/extensions:
Makefile Added files:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:16 PM, ghe g...@slsware.com wrote:
This does bring a question to my mind, though. Why is this ruleset
optimization kept a secret? It's a *very* major piece of pf, IMHO. I did a
significant amount of reading and looking around, and I never saw it
discussed in any detail
On Nov 1, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
The optimizer is documented in both the pfctl and pf.conf man pages,
and the one for pf.conf tells you exactly what it does.
In pfctl's man page (4.6), there is a statement that the kernel
sometimes skips rules -- no mention of the optimizer
The earlier poster (Jason) is right: this *is* the way a firewall
should work -- spend your time on implementing the security policy and
let the 'compiler' worry about efficiency. But since the others don't,
it might be a good idea to go into this at some length.
Since it just does what
On Nov 1, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Since it just does what a good system should do, what is there to go
into at length about?
What it does. How it does it. If that were documented, it'd sure be
easier to use the tools more effectively.
Yes, other systems taught you to
Since it just does what a good system should do, what is there to go
into at length about?
What it does. How it does it. If that were documented, it'd sure be
easier to use the tools more effectively.
It does what it does, how it does it, in the source code. Manual pages
do not serve
On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:24:21 +0200
Ross Cameron abal...@gmail.com wrote:
OpenBSD 4.6 i386 seems quite happy in VirtualBox 3.0.10 r54097 (Fedora
11 i686 as a host).
No funnies at all, just boot the cd46.iso image and ftp install and no
issues whatsoever (SMP and non-SMP VMs).
Same with
Henning Brauer wrote:
yyou need to upgrade php to 5.2.11, from -stable.
Sorry if I have missed something, but where would I find the ports
changes for -stable? (Other than manually looking in each port's
Makefile details.) Until Henning mentioned the new version, I had no
idea php had
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if this is any cause for concern, but I
recently had to run an fsck due to a power failure
on my base 4.6 i386 box, and I noticed some
unreferenced files from MySQL.
I installed MySQL from packages and followed the
instructions for a secure install.
I'm pretty new to
Unreferenced files are totally normal when a sudden power down occurs.
Especially on /tmp. So stop worrying, and trust fsck to do the right thing.
-Otto
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:56:50PM -0800, Mark Yieh wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if this is any cause for concern, but I
Mark Yieh m...@ozoneonline.com writes:
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if this is any cause for concern, but I
recently had to run an fsck due to a power failure
on my base 4.6 i386 box, and I noticed some
unreferenced files from MySQL.
I installed MySQL from packages and followed the
36 matches
Mail list logo
