On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Woodchuck wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Chris Bennett
> wrote:
...
>> Did ed come out before or after those clickety-clack paper printing
>> terminals?
>
> All text editors came after teletypes. (Teletypes go back to
> the 1920's).
Sure, but ed was d
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 08:23:56PM -0500, Brad Tilley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
> wrote:
> > > "Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
> >
> > Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
> > more
> > Brad> comfortable with vi. Will a stat
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
>>> Is there a common emergency that comes up where /usr is not available?
Curdled RAID? etc,,,
> Did ed come out before or after those clickety-clack paper printing
> terminals?
All text editors came after teletypes. (Teletypes go back to
* Jon Simola (jsim...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Mauro Rezzonico wrote:
> > Mount under /usr/backup, or /var/backup, or /tmp/backup or whatever!
>
> And/Or wrap the backup script with something that checks for the mount.
Thanks, I will do both and throw in a mail notifi
Brad Tilley wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
wrote:
"Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
more
Brad> comfortable with vi. Will a static vi ever live in /bin? Helping
someone
Brad> use
On 18/12/2009, at 1:26 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote:
> Brad Tilley wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
>> wrote:
"Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
>>> Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
>>> more
>>> Brad> comfortable with vi. Will
Brad Tilley wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
> wrote:
>>> "Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
>> Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
>> more
>> Brad> comfortable with vi. Will a static vi ever live in /bin? Helping
>> someone
>> Brad>
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, "Randal L. Schwartz"
wrote:
> > "Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
>
> Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot
> more
> Brad> comfortable with vi. Will a static vi ever live in /bin? Helping
> someone
> Brad> use ed remotely, who has
> "Brad" == Brad Tilley writes:
Brad> I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot more
Brad> comfortable with vi. Will a static vi ever live in /bin? Helping someone
Brad> use ed remotely, who has never used ed, when I myself don't use it
Brad> regularly is always an adve
I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot more
comfortable with vi. Will a static vi ever live in /bin? Helping someone
use ed remotely, who has never used ed, when I myself don't use it
regularly is always an adventure.
Brad
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Mikael Bak wrote:
> Dope Ice Apollyon the Third wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:36:02PM +0100, Mikael Bak wrote:
Hi list,
I'm really new to openbsd, so please forgive me if th
Acapgt]r v_ker jai v_koi,
http://www.moneyshowonline.com/system/assets/000/000/111/original_AD_AGGELAKHS_Money_09_EXPRESS_ATHENS_09.pdf
Lia tekeuta_a upemh}lisg cia to S\bbato 19 Dejelbq_ou , ~qer 18:00
20:00 jai Juqiaj^ 20 Dejelbq_ou, ~qer 14:00 16:00, sto nemodowe_o
HILTON cia ma paqajokou
Dear Cardmember,
American Express card account: 3717-XX-
As a security measure, we regularly monitor our customer's
accounts.
In carrying out our monitoring, we have noticed that your account
needs further verification in line with current regulations, and
we have temporarily restrict
On 2009-12-15, Doran Mori wrote:
> It looks like the last road block in my router project is going to be
> similar to Vladimir Kirillov's problem. In my case I'm having a
> downed link layer host route take precedence over an up ospf /32 route
So it seems that any host routes, even RTP_DOWN, tak
On 12/17/2009 7:48 AM, David Coppa wrote:
I think you need Microsoft Windows Services for UNIX (SFU) installed
on your AD server.
Server 2003 R2 and above include schema entries for Unix.
Unfortunately, they're not quite the same as what SFU used. If you
don't have either installed I'd say g
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Why should we care about the last few percent of performance on a desktop
PC. Seriously it will be fast enough even for HD porn.
In the end the pathetic seek times of desktop SATA disks will be the most
limiting factor when you hit them with nearly random access patterns.
B
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:14 +0100, "Robert" wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:31:58 -0600
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
>
> > Highly specialized applications could benefit but lets count how many
> > of those use WDC SATA drives. I can see the BS already coming our
> > way, OMG MOAR bytes!!! totally bet
On 2009-12-17, Pete Vickers wrote:
> Is the IPMI abstraction (mentioned in ipmi(4)) such that support for
> additional devices is little more than adding PCI vendor/product id to
> the attach code? or is a proprietary interface ?
You probably just have to enable the driver, I imagine it will
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:31:58 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Highly specialized applications could benefit but lets count how many
> of those use WDC SATA drives. I can see the BS already coming our
> way, OMG MOAR bytes!!! totally bettar!!!
Yay, moar bytes!!111!11!
Thing is, every harddisk mak
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:30:46 +0100
Robert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just read [1,2] that Western Digital (and probably others) will
> start to sell disks with an internal block size of 4KB instead of 512
> byte.
>
> The article mentions that this might lead to a considerable
> performance impact if th
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Claudio Jeker
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:54:54PM +0100, Robert wrote:
>> If I understood the original article correct this would mean that
>> the writing of 1 sector could in fact be 2 reads + 1 write
>> (internally in the disk), which would be a *serious
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:58:12PM -0600, Brad DeMorrow wrote:
> Hey guys, I need a bit of help if you don't mind.
>
> I've been trying to hack up a basic driver to communicate with my Edgeport
> device..
> It started out decent enough, I got a new driver I named uep(for no
> particular reason bes
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 02:45:25AM -0600, Adam Thompson wrote:
> First, some baseline data:
>
> r...@server:~# cat /etc/mailer.conf | grep -v '^#'
> sendmail/usr/sbin/smtpd
> send-mail /usr/sbin/smtpctl
> mailq /usr/sbin/smtpctl
> makemap /usr/libexec/smtp
David Adams Good day, I have a Mutual Beneficial Business Project for you
worth millions of dollars. 1. Can you handle this? 2. Can I give you this
trust ? To commence this transaction,I require you to immediately
indicate your interest by a return e-mail. Best regard, David Adams
dav...@i12.com
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Mauro Rezzonico wrote:
> Joakim Aronius wrote:
>
>> I added a big disk over USB which I use for
>> backup (mounted on /backup).
>
> Well don't do that!
>
> Mount under /usr/backup, or /var/backup, or /tmp/backup or whatever!
And/Or wrap the backup script with some
Hi,
I have a HP (Compaq) ProLiant DL380 G5 which, according to dmesg,
incorporates IPMI.
# grep IPMI /var/run/dmesg.boot
"Hewlett-Packard IPMI" rev 0x00 at pci16 dev 4 function 6 not configured
# pcidump -v 1:4:6
Domain /dev/pci:
1:4:6: Hewlett-Packard IPMI
0x: Vendor ID: 103c P
Joakim Aronius wrote:
I have an old home server which ran out of disk space
> I added a big disk over USB which I use for
> backup (mounted on /backup).
Well don't do that!
Mount under /usr/backup, or /var/backup, or /tmp/backup or whatever!
Is this due to my ancient HW, crappy USB controller
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:53:41AM -0500, stan wrote:
> I have 2 4.6 machine that bridge an Ethernet network between 2 locations. I
> need to add another machine that will bring a 3rd location into this
> bridge.
>
> I seem to be close, but I am missing something here. I seem to have the
> flows
Hi!
It is happening for quite long time already, as I have to deal with
RADIUS traffic, it came to the point where I can't bear it no more.
All the traffic I see contains raw binary Class fields.
RFC2865 WRT Class field content says the following:
The String field is one or more octets. T
Rouslan Iskhakov wrote:
Tried both options (with redirection and without).
Same behavior with default kernel (without aac driver).
I think the problem lies in BOOT/amd64, Have you tried with i386 arch?
You don't have to install anything, just try to bootstrap from a i386
Install disk/cdrom...
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:53:41AM -0500, stan wrote:
> I have 2 4.6 machine that bridge an Ethernet network between 2 locations. I
> need to add another machine that will bring a 3rd location into this
> bridge.
>
> I seem to be close, but I am missing something here. I seem to have the
> flows
Tried both options (with redirection and without).
Same behavior with default kernel (without aac driver).
Regards,
Rouslan
- Original Message -
From: "Mauro Rezzonico"
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: P'P5QP2P5QP3, 17 PP5P:P0P1QQ 2009 P3 16:51:28 (GMT+0200)
Auto-Detected
Subject: Re: Open
Marco Peereboom wrote:
I'll bet money there is no noticeable performance loss in a real world
load. Maybe a slight drop in some sort of stupid micro benchmark.
I don't unless we decide to go change every piece of code that makes the
512b assumption.
Ok, I got the message.
Basically that's
I have 2 4.6 machine that bridge an Ethernet network between 2 locations. I
need to add another machine that will bring a 3rd location into this
bridge.
I seem to be close, but I am missing something here. I seem to have the
flows and SA's set up on the 3rd machine. here is what the "herad end" :
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:54:54PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
>> let's not wave our hands around in the air for no good reason. surely there
>> are more important things to get upset about.
>
> I have to object here.
>
> If I understood the original article correct this would mean t
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 03:54:54PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
> >let's not wave our hands around in the air for no good reason. surely there
> >are more important things to get upset about.
>
> I have to object here.
>
> If I understood the original article correct this would mean
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:54:54 +0100
Robert wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
> > let's not wave our hands around in the air for no good reason.
> > surely there are more important things to get upset about.
>
> I have to object here.
>
> If I understood the original article correct this would mean th
Kevin Lo wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:29 -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > Fred Crowson wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/16/09, Fred Crowson wrote:
> > > > On 12/16/09, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > > >> Dear All,
> > > >>
> > > >> Is anybody using Learning Management System ATutor? The only LMS
David Gwynne wrote:
let's not wave our hands around in the air for no good reason. surely there
are more important things to get upset about.
I have to object here.
If I understood the original article correct this would mean that the
writing of 1 sector could in fact be 2 reads + 1 write (in
Rouslan Iskhakov wrote:
OpenBSD 4.6-stable freezes on boot until any key pressed.
...
Using drive 0, partition 3.
Loading...
probing: pc0 com0 mem[619K 2814M 1280M a20=on]
disk: hd0+
OpenBSD/amd64 BOOT 3.01
boot>
...
Something in the BIOS, perhaps? Like console redirection etc.?
--
Mauro Rez
Joakim Dellrud wrote:
Hello.
First of I would like to ask for forgivness if I post this question in the
wrong list, I'm new to this...
So now to my question: I have a Microsoft 2003 Active Directory server and
an already working configuration for a Centos/redhat environment. But my
problem has
On 17/12/2009, at 11:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Aaron Mason [2009-12-17 03:50]:
>> From what I've seen, 4k blocks are supported by most filesystems
>> anyway - and besides, provided the partitions are created on 4k block
>> boundaries, there's no reason for any concern IMHO.
>
> you are mis
unfortunately I did a new install with the snapshot a couple of months
ago and didn't bother keeping anything from /var/log from previous
install (or anything else for that matter).
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-12-17, Stefan Olsson wrote:
I have an intermittent problem on one of my fir
On 2009/12/17 12:57, Stefan Olsson wrote:
> unfortunately I did a new install with the snapshot a couple of
> months ago and didn't bother keeping anything from /var/log from
> previous install (or anything else for that matter).
In that case, fetch an old kernel of a version which used to work,
b
> Okay the offending class has been removed and now it is just timing out
with this error: "clnttcp_create: RPC: Remote system error - Connection
refused". Which gets me one step closer thank you!
Now it's working a bit more :P
Regards Jocke
On 17/12/2009, at 10:25 PM, Joakim Dellrud wrote:
> Hello.
> First of I would like to ask for forgivness if I post this question in the
> wrong list, I'm new to this...
>
> So now to my question: I have a Microsoft 2003 Active Directory server and
> an already working configuration for a Centos/r
* Aaron Mason [2009-12-17 03:50]:
> From what I've seen, 4k blocks are supported by most filesystems
> anyway - and besides, provided the partitions are created on 4k block
> boundaries, there's no reason for any concern IMHO.
you are missing the point. these drives do not expose the fact that
th
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Joakim Dellrud wrote:
> So now to my question: I have a Microsoft 2003 Active Directory server and
> an already working configuration for a Centos/redhat environment. But my
> problem has occured when trying to include the BSD (openbsd 4,5 with
> login_ldap instal
Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> 4K sectors themselves should work ok as we already do that for ffs on
> CD media. Which works the last I checked.
... and is irrelevant. The drives under discussion use 4 kB sectors
internally but present the usual 512-byte blocks to the outside.
--
Christian "nadd
Hello.
First of I would like to ask for forgivness if I post this question in the
wrong list, I'm new to this...
So now to my question: I have a Microsoft 2003 Active Directory server and
an already working configuration for a Centos/redhat environment. But my
problem has occured when trying to
Hello,
I would like to ask about potential plans regarding UTF-8 in locales
support.
In details (now on my box runs 4.6 release) I am looking
in /usr/share/locale for xx_XX.UTF-8 but all catalogs with UTF-8 are
empty - current release is not supporting that encoding ?
The problem starts when
On 2009-12-17, Stefan Olsson wrote:
> I have an intermittent problem on one of my firewalls. It has worked well for
> years with different openbsd-releases but a few days after installing a
> snapshot a few months ago it sometimes just stops taking traffic on the
> internal nic. And all you get at
4.5-release does this too on xSeries 336.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Rouslan Iskhakov
Sent: 17 December 2009 11:08
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD 4.6-stable on IBM x3550 freezes on boot until key is pressed
En caso de no poder ver correctamente este correo favor de dar clic aqum
Este mensaje fue enviado para informacisn de nuestras promociones. No
pretendemos saturar su correo ni causarle molestias. Este mensaje de correo
electrsnico no se considera "SPAM", ya que cumple con lo establecido en el
Hello,
I have an intermittent problem on one of my firewalls. It has worked well for
years with different openbsd-releases but a few days after installing a
snapshot a few months ago it sometimes just stops taking traffic on the
internal nic. And all you get at the console is "watchdog timeout on
Hi,
OpenBSD 4.6-stable freezes on boot until any key pressed.
Kernel is custom (with aac driver enabled).
Thanks in the advance,
Rouslan
Using drive 0, partition 3.
Loading...
probing: pc0 com0 mem[619K 2814M 1280M a20=on]
disk: hd0+
>> OpenBSD/amd64 BOOT 3.01
boot>
booting hd0a:/bsd: 4817500+97
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:45:25 -0600
Adam Thompson wrote:
> First, some baseline data:
> So. WTF am I doing wrong? Help!
You should add the following line to your smtpd.conf
accept for local deliver to mbox
or
accept from local for local deliver to mbox
>
> -Adam Thompson
> athom...@
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 16:29 -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Fred Crowson wrote:
>
> > On 12/16/09, Fred Crowson wrote:
> > > On 12/16/09, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> > >> Dear All,
> > >>
> > >> Is anybody using Learning Management System ATutor? The only LMS I
> > >> noticed in ports is Mood
First, some baseline data:
r...@server:~# cat /etc/mailer.conf | grep -v '^#'
sendmail/usr/sbin/smtpd
send-mail /usr/sbin/smtpctl
mailq /usr/sbin/smtpctl
makemap /usr/libexec/smtpd/makemap
newaliases /usr/libexec/smtpd/makemap
Not sure if this is r
Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, voir ici
Ajoutez tele-lois...@ml.tv-news.fr ` votre carnet d'adresses pour
recevoir vos programmes plus facilement
Programme-TV.net - TC)lC) Loisirs
Votre programme TV
Jeudi 17 DC)cembre 2009
150 euros de produits C remporter, des bons de rC)duction
60 matches
Mail list logo
