> Firefox: might slow down on some sort of sites (heavy javascript,
> etc). If on tab crashes, the whole thing goes down. Privacy a bit more
> trustworthy than google
Why?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 16:25, nixlists wrote:
> Hi. People on this list are security-conscious. I wonder what browsers they
> use?
> What browsers do you consider more secure than others?
> Granted, they're all full of all kinds of holes, but what do you do to
> tighten their security?
>
> Thank
id try this on a sili(4), ahci(4), or mpi(4) controller and see what happens.
my guess is you're hitting issues in the ata stack, specifically to do with
the block offsets of your io ops.
dlg
On 01/01/2010, at 12:03 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> I've been using dd to test some of my hard drives
Here's what we're offering for this week:
788,114 in total * 17,482 emails
Coverage in many different areas of medicine such as Endocrinology, Pathology,
Urology,
Neurology, Plastic Surgery, Psychiatry, Cardiology and much more
16 different sortable fields
Searching for a Dentists Database
In early 2005 the drive containing the OS (3.6 -release) in my backup
server started throwing random faults and the system became unusable.
The laptop that the server was backing up had it's hard drive fry
itself two days prior and the replacement hadn't shown up yet. I used
a Knoppix liv
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:41:48 +0100 Matthieu Herrb
wrote:
> I don't know why you are looking for so complicated things.
>
> Option "DontZap" in the xorg.conf "ServerFlags" section still works
>
> If you don't want to setup a full xorg.conf, you can create it with
> just this section:
>
> Sectio
On 12/31/09, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:56:03 -0500 nixlists wrote:
>
>> On 12/30/09, Tasmanian Devil wrote:
>> >>> Changes in version 0.2.1.21 - 2009-12-21
>> >>
>> >> Downloaded, installed - same exact problem. Tried -alpha as well.
>> >> Same problem. I assumed alpha worked.
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:57 +0100, "Tomas Bodzar" wrote:
> I tried it in VM on VirtualBox. Here is my output :
>
> $ dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m count=10
> 10+0 records in
> 10+0 records out
> 10485760 bytes transferred in 0.403 secs (25985597 bytes/sec)
> $
>
> $ dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/
I tried it in VM on VirtualBox. Here is my output :
$ dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null bs=1m count=10
10+0 records in
10+0 records out
10485760 bytes transferred in 0.403 secs (25985597 bytes/sec)
$
$ dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null
^C18777+0 records in
18777+0 records out
9613824 bytes transferred in
I don't know why you are looking for so complicated things.
Option "DontZap" in the xorg.conf "ServerFlags" section still works
If you don't want to setup a full xorg.conf, you can create it with
just this section:
Section "ServerFlags"
Option "DontZap"
EndSection
and it works as expected.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 05:27:41PM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> If mic plugged in line input, but inputs.mic.source=mic0 still, i get:
it's not supposed to work when you have the mic in the line input. the
signal from the mic is too weak. and if you are using the line input,
with a line lev
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:33 AM, J.C. Roberts
wrote:
...
> Find where your backspace key is mapped since also used to terminate the
> X server. (note long line is wrapped in this mail)
>
> $ xmodmap -pke | grep -i backspace
> keycode 22 = BackSpace Terminate_Server BackSpace Terminate_Server
> B
> On Nov 23 Roland Dreir sent a patch for interrupt handling, but it
> doesn't apply on -current since the file rt2661.c changed slightly
> a few weeks earlier (1.51, date: 2009/11/01).
two "e"s in "Dreier" :)
> This patch just changes Roland's patch to update against rt2661.c
> r1.51 from t
hi,
this message may be a little too long, the most intriguing part is the
difference between sizes reported by the kernel (in dmesg) and bioctl.
any idea, why bioctl reports size 1 TB smaller?
i've got HP proliant dl140 with "Hewlett-Packard Smart Array" card in it.
put a couple of 1.5 TB disks
try a -current kernel. I fixed an issue where that would happen;
although I am positive it is the same.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 03:34:39PM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 09:03:30AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> > dd: /dev/rwd0c: Input/output error
> > 268435455+0 record
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:03 -0500, "Scott McEachern" wrote:
> I've been using dd to test some of my hard drives and just ran into the
> oddest of coincidences.
>
> I used this command (or variation without the time command)
>
> # time dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null
>
> on three machines with thre
On 31/12/2009 12:08, Edd Barrett wrote:
PS.
The solaris installer is dumb and will probably fail to detect a disk
with a BSD disk label on it. There is another step you will need to do
in the 'format' utility in solaris related to the partition table. I
forget the exact details. Go googling.
h
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 09:03:30AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> dd: /dev/rwd0c: Input/output error
> 268435455+0 records in
> 268435455+0 records out
> 137438952960 bytes transferred in 23740.766 secs (5789154 bytes/sec)
Note that 137438952960 + 512 = 2^37. So, dd is failing while reading
byte
2009/12/31 Alexandre Ratchov
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:13:52AM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> > Trying to get fully working my shiny OpenBSD 4.6-stable.
> >
> > Now i had some problem with recording.
> > I'm just playing around about two days and still no love.
> > Can't enumerate all variant
I've been using dd to test some of my hard drives and just ran into the
oddest of coincidences.
I used this command (or variation without the time command)
# time dd if=/dev/rwd0c of=/dev/null
on three machines with three HDD's of sizes 40GB SATA, 40GB IDE and 30GB
IDE, one of those 40GB (SAT
You are invited to "Je sur comptable a la banque BCB je vais virie $6.million a
la etranger".
By your host Ashraf Cotu:
Date: Thursday December 31, 2009
Time: 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm (GMT +00:00)
Location: cher ami Salut, je suis MONSIEUR. ASHRAF CO
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 09:24:04PM -0800, Allen wrote:
> I've got a sparc u5 with running openbsd. I need to re-install Solaris on
> this system. It's been a long time since I've worked on this system, and I'm
> having trouble booting to the Solaris cd. I can't get the system to boot to
> the origi
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:13:52AM +0300, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> Trying to get fully working my shiny OpenBSD 4.6-stable.
>
> Now i had some problem with recording.
> I'm just playing around about two days and still no love.
> Can't enumerate all variants that i tried.
>
> Try to record with:
>
patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> Lars Nooden wrote:
>>> I don't need it currently.
>>>
>>> I did get good benefits out of it with some embedded devices I used to
>>> need frequently. It made start up noticeably faster on a pair of
>>> net4801
Top Shop
"Budite radosni kad god vam se za to pruE>a moguDnost, i kad god za to
nalazite snage u sebi, jer trenuci D
iste radosti vrede i znaD
e viE!e
nego D
itavi dani i meseci naE!eg E>ivota provedeni u mutnoj igri naE!ih
sitnih i krupnih strasti i zahteva. A minut D
iste radosti ostaje u nama
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:24:19 -0800 "J.C. Roberts"
wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:49:59 -0600 "Evangelos Tsiaplas"
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings all, I was hoping to disable the ctrl+alt+backspace key
> > combo for killing an X session. I recall being able to do so with
> > the Don'tZap option with
Ian Darwin schrieb:
On Nov 23 Roland Dreir sent a patch for interrupt handling, but it
doesn't apply on -current since the file rt2661.c changed slightly
a few weeks earlier (1.51, date: 2009/11/01).
This patch just changes Roland's patch to update against rt2661.c
r1.51 from the OpenBSD reposit
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:24:19 -0800 "J.C. Roberts"
wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:49:59 -0600 "Evangelos Tsiaplas"
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings all, I was hoping to disable the ctrl+alt+backspace key
> > combo for killing an X session. I recall being able to do so with
> > the Don'tZap option with
28 matches
Mail list logo
