On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:59:59AM -0500, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
| Dear All,
|
| I was wondering if anybody tried to install OpenBSD on Wyle C90LE.
|
| http://www.wyse.com/products/hardware/thinclients/C90LE/index.asp
|
| We are planning to equip 120 thin clients computer lab with those. I got
|
Dear All,
I was wondering if anybody tried to install OpenBSD on Wyle C90LE.
http://www.wyse.com/products/hardware/thinclients/C90LE/index.asp
We are planning to equip 120 thin clients computer lab with those. I got
today one for my office for evaluation purposes and I really liked the
toy. It c
nixlists wrote:
The idea is to limit memory such that running out of RAM+swap is not
possible, or unlikely. You can set the limit on the allowed number of
processes as well.
I do use ulimit / login.conf for some processes, but does anybody really
use it for *all possible* processes on each pro
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:55:29PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Shm shouldn't be mapped in the kernel, so large values won't be that
> bad.
But the way that shared mem is implemented means that larger
values require a larger malloc(9), which can increase the
pressure on kva space, which can panic y
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:54:31 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
> I suspect man growfs may be closer to his needs. Hopefully g is at the
> end of a drive with some space left.
>
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 5:11 PM, "L. V. Lammert" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Yamidt Henao wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:23 PM, bofh wrote:
>> The idea is to limit memory such that running out of RAM+swap is not
>> possible, or unlikely. You can set the limit on the allowed number of
>> processes as well.
>
>
> $ ulimit -m
> 971876
> $ dmesg | grep real\ mem
> real mem = 1039691776 (991MB)
Obviously, as any competent sysadmin like nixlists knows, you should
restrict all your processes to a max of 20 megs.
On Jan 27, 2010, at 9:23 PM, bofh wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:14 PM, nixlists wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Denis Doroshenko
wrote:
aren't you missing the
"Bofh (Peter Kay)" suggested
> System maintenance, IMO, should be invisible to the user unless it
> requires input. Shutdown is
> a poor time to run maintenance because it's (probably) run more often
> when something needs to
> be done to the machine or the user has to go somewhere in a hurry.
>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:14 PM, nixlists wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Denis Doroshenko
> wrote:
>> aren't you missing the point of original comment made by Otto?
>>
>> consider a situation, when all the processes in the system "are
>> behaving", none of them violates their rlimits,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Denis Doroshenko
wrote:
> On 1/28/10, nixlists wrote:
>> Why kill random processes that may not be misbehaving and/or cause a
>> kernel panic when you want to kill the process(es) that leak memory or
>> are hungry in the first place? It's possible to avoid kern
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Denis Doroshenko
wrote:
> so the OS needs to do something. what should it do? should it just
> panic? or may be losing one process is better than losing them all?
> then, what are the criteria for choosing processes to be killed?..
>
> wondering if "random" means
On 1/28/10, nixlists wrote:
> Why kill random processes that may not be misbehaving and/or cause a
> kernel panic when you want to kill the process(es) that leak memory or
> are hungry in the first place? It's possible to avoid kernel panics in
> this case IMO, and not kill random processes.
Shm shouldn't be mapped in the kernel, so large values won't be that
bad.
On Jan 27, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:13:45PM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
I have searched (and searched) so I wonder if I'm running into the
i386 1GB limit I see referenced, as in the
I suspect man growfs may be closer to his needs. Hopefully g is at the
end of a drive with some space left.
On Jan 27, 2010, at 5:11 PM, "L. V. Lammert" wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Yamidt Henao wrote:
Hi,
somebody know how I can change the mount available in me file system?
# df -h
Files
Tobias Ulmer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:13:45PM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
I have searched (and searched) so I wonder if I'm running into the
i386 1GB limit I see referenced, as in the thread today about fsck
on larger partitions.
Yes you do. Also, kernel memory is limited, insane shm valu
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Robert wrote:
> frantisek holop wrote:
>>
>> the kernel will kill random processes? are we talking about linux's OOM
>> here or openbsd? since when is this in openbsd? i seem to recall
>> some debate where openbsd devs found that idea ridiculous. i know i do,
Whoops... re-reading, I see that I missed your disklabel output... sorry.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:25 -0500, "Brad Tilley" wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:43 +, "Rob Sheldon"
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > softraid0 at root
> > root on sd1a swap on sd1b dump on sd1b
> >
> > ...that's odd, it's
On 2010-01-27, Rob Sheldon wrote:
> The longer version: this is a backup server running backuppc for a
> corporate client ("large enough number of workstations") that does research
> work ("some really big files"). I _thought_ I had read the big filesystem
> FAQ carefully, but somehow missed that
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:43 +, "Rob Sheldon" wrote:
[snip]
> softraid0 at root
> root on sd1a swap on sd1b dump on sd1b
>
> ...that's odd, it's showing swap (and dump) on sd1b, but there's no such
> thing:
>
> $ sudo df /dev/sd1b
> df: /dev/sd1b: Device not configured
>
> ...maybe it really
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Yamidt Henao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somebody know how I can change the mount available in me file system?
>
> # df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 159M 70.5M 80.4M47%/
> /dev/wd0f 11.6M130K 10.9M 1%/home
>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:13:45PM -0700, Jeff Ross wrote:
> I have searched (and searched) so I wonder if I'm running into the
> i386 1GB limit I see referenced, as in the thread today about fsck
> on larger partitions.
Yes you do. Also, kernel memory is limited, insane shm value will
probably (h
Hi,
somebody know how I can change the mount available in me file system?
# df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 159M 70.5M 80.4M47%/
/dev/wd0f 11.6M130K 10.9M 1%/home
/dev/wd0d 19.3M 12.0K 18.3M 0%/tmp
/dev/wd
On 2010-01-27, ropers wrote:
> Or maybe FreeBSD uses GNU sed -- I haven't checked.)
nope, that's GNU sort that they use (ya rly). they use BSD sed.
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anybody please have experience in using Facebook API
> from OpenBSD with chrooted Apache and the php5 from packages?
>
> I'm trying to call theirs $fb->api_client->admin_setAppProperties()
> but get the error:
>
> Warning: fopen() [function.fopen]: URL
On 2010-01-27, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
> My main need is debugging DNS packets (mDNS), and reading raw tcpdump
> output isn't very easy, I need to really debug the protocol, so
> something that could show me field names and values would be cool.
>
> Right now I'm using tcpdump and accountin
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:06:19 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> No, currently the amount of physical memory an amd64 can address is
> limited.
Well, F___. :-(
The rule here then is, if you've got a partition bigger than 1TB, you
*must* have swap?
- R.
--
[__ Robert Sheldon
[__ Founder, No Proble
I'm not getting something about the best way to set up a server using
PostgreSQL as a backend for a busy web server running drupal.
The postgresql performance tuning folks
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server
say that in a server with more that 1GB of ram
"a rea
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 08:43:40PM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:42:42 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:38:47AM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
> >
> >> There's no dmesg attached because I'm not on-site with the server at
> the
> >> moment, and because AF
I like ettercap for that.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've always used wireshark for packet sniffing, it solved most of my needs.
>
> First of all, I'm not questioning the why of not having a port, I've
> read the previous posts (I really don't
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:42:42 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:38:47AM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
>
>> There's no dmesg attached because I'm not on-site with the server at
the
>> moment, and because AFAICT this is a known problem.
>
> A pity, since it does matter what platf
Tried adding
66.220.146.15 api.facebook.com
to /var/www/etc/hosts as well...
Hi there,
I've always used wireshark for packet sniffing, it solved most of my needs.
First of all, I'm not questioning the why of not having a port, I've
read the previous posts (I really don't care why, don't start a
discussion).
My main need is debugging DNS packets (mDNS), and reading raw tc
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:14:51PM +, Paul Branston wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> >> Have you looked at man usermod? -p flag in particular.
> >
> > Shame on me, indeed. It has been a game:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > PASSWORD=$(echo "my_new_password"
hmm, on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Robert said that
> If the OS runs out of (any) memory then there is already a serious
there's plenty of discussion about the virtues/stupidity
of the OOM killer approach, including various "pardon" policies.
google for "out of fuel linux" for amusemen
Hello,
does anybody please have experience in using Facebook API
from OpenBSD with chrooted Apache and the php5 from packages?
I'm trying to call theirs $fb->api_client->admin_setAppProperties()
but get the error:
Warning: fopen() [function.fopen]: URL file-access is disabled in the
server confi
http://www.gossipgamers.com/pokemon-redesigned-in-traditional-japanese-style-artwork/
Paul Branston wrote:
> A little more generic in case there is no usermod -p
>
> PASSWORD=$(echo "my_new_password" | encrypt -b 6)
> perl -p -i.bk -e 's/^root:.*?:/root:$PASSWORD:/' /etc/shadow
Wow,
Question: are you even using OpenBSD?
-Bryan.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
>> Have you looked at man usermod? -p flag in particular.
>
> Shame on me, indeed. It has been a game:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> PASSWORD=$(echo "my_new_password" | encrypt -b 6)
> usermod -p $PASSWORD root
>
A little more generic in case
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:44:01AM -0500, Bryan Allen wrote:
> They're solid, and they fly.
That's what I hoped to hear.
> You can pick up RAM cheap from crucial, and get disk sleds from memoryx
> (541-2123) so you don't have to pay disk markup.
This is not an issue. The one I'll have at hand ha
Have you looked at man usermod? -p flag in particular.
Shame on me, indeed. It has been a game:
#!/bin/sh
PASSWORD=$(echo "my_new_password" | encrypt -b 6)
usermod -p $PASSWORD root
Thanks.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration.
On 26 January 2010 c. 02:14:22 Eric wrote:
> By the way, I like your sig.
It's just seen by me on misc@ a long time ago :)
--
Best wishes,
Vadim Zhukov
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is t
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:31:40AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:00 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
> >> Depends on the arch. i386 is limited to 1G, amd64 is limited to 8G per
> >> process. What happen
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:05:17 +0100
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> HI all,
>
> ?Is there any way t change the root password using a shell-script
> (aka non-interactive mod as passwd uses)?
>
> I've used pw in FreeBSD and chpasswd in Debian GNU/Linux to do it,
> bit I've not found a way/command to
HI all,
?Is there any way t change the root password using a shell-script (aka
non-interactive mod as passwd uses)?
I've used pw in FreeBSD and chpasswd in Debian GNU/Linux to do it, bit
I've not found a way/command to do it with my OpenBSD boxes.
At present my approach will be install exce
frantisek holop wrote:
the kernel will kill random processes? are we talking about linux's OOM
here or openbsd? since when is this in openbsd? i seem to recall
some debate where openbsd devs found that idea ridiculous. i know i do,
and the machine should panic instead of starting shooting dow
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:00 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
>> Depends on the arch. i386 is limited to 1G, amd64 is limited to 8G per
>> process. What happens if more memory is allocated than the available
>> swap is that the k
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:11:57AM -0500, Joe Gidi wrote:
> On Wed, January 27, 2010 9:28 am, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > Depends on the arch. i386 is limited to 1G, amd64 is limited to 8G per
> > process. What happens if more memory is allocated than the available
> > swap is that the kernel will k
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:00:32 +0100, frantisek holop
wrote:
> hmm, on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
>
> the kernel will kill random processes? are we talking about linux's OOM
> here or openbsd? since when is this in openbsd? i seem to recall
> some debate where
On Wed, January 27, 2010 9:28 am, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Depends on the arch. i386 is limited to 1G, amd64 is limited to 8G per
> process. What happens if more memory is allocated than the available
> swap is that the kernel will kill random processes to free swap. That
> might be what is going on
hmm, on Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 03:28:12PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek said that
> Depends on the arch. i386 is limited to 1G, amd64 is limited to 8G per
> process. What happens if more memory is allocated than the available
> swap is that the kernel will kill random processes to free swap. That
> might be
Iskoristite do 10. februara - "Dole kilogrami!"
Samo u ovoj akciji E!tedite i do neverovatnih
-62%!
B;
smrE!ajte jednostavno, bez truda - imamo prava reE!enja
B;
uE!tedite pri kupovini i dostavi hit proizvoda za dijetu i lepotu
B;
PodseDamo - super cene i uslovi joE! 14 dana, do 10.2.2010.
Can't we all just get along ?
Fuck sake, does someone here thinks this thread is going anywhere ?
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 02:06:20PM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:42:42 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:38:47AM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >
> > Therse days, amd64 is the only platform that increases the limit
> > (MAXDSIZE) to 8G. Th
I've solved my problem, It was a routing problem caused by a
misconfiguration with a client-config-ccd with a wrong parameter.
client-conf-ccd ccd
but with an absolute path (ex /etc/openvpn/ccd) it works.
Thanks.
Hi Simen. Then 10.0.8.1 and 10.0.8.2 are allocate by openvpn server
and in the cl
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:42:42 +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:38:47AM +, Rob Sheldon wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Therse days, amd64 is the only platform that increases the limit
> (MAXDSIZE) to 8G. Though you venture into untested territory, we
> (myself at least) just do not
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:10:47 -0600 (CST), "L. V. Lammert"
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Rob Sheldon wrote:
>
> Don't know if this is related to a problem I had on a machine recently,
..
> however I found that if I hung the 'bad' drive on ANOTHER machine, the
> fsck ran just fine!
To be honest, I
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:54 -0500, "Chris Dukes" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:38:08PM -0800, mehma sarja wrote:
> > I am running an embedded 533 MHz with 256 MB memory and it is woefully
> > inadequate for an office setting. Even for a home setting which wants stuff
> > like snort running as
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 04:38:08PM -0800, mehma sarja wrote:
> I am running an embedded 533 MHz with 256 MB memory and it is woefully
> inadequate for an office setting. Even for a home setting which wants stuff
> like snort running as well. I would WAG atleast a 2 GB memory and the Atoms
> max out
What ways are there to get the checksums from bsd.rd without actually
booting with it and going through the installation of sets?
/Lars
Retrait de points
Suspension du permis de conduire
Contester ses contraventions
Doit on payer ses contraventions ?
Comment contester un retrait de point
Comment contester une annulation du permis de conduire
Hi,
I am trying to make build from the latest 4.6 sources. During the
compilation proces i encounter the following error:
make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1
../../../miniperl "-I../../../lib" "-I../../../lib" Makefile.PL
"INSTALLDIRS=perl" "INSTALLMAN3DIR=none" "PERL_CORE=1"
"LIBPERL_A=l
Gentile Cliente,
da questo momento h disponibile on-line l'estratto conto mensile riferito
al codice del rapporto 01002-33047891: potr` consultarlo, stamparlo e
salvarlo
sul suo PC per creare un suo archivio personalizzato.
Le ricordiamo che ogni estratto conto rimane in linea fino al terzo mese
62 matches
Mail list logo
