On 3 May 2010 03:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :)
This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh
everyday :):
ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz
Apache 1.3.29
Requests per second:149.23
Every time a configure script fails, you read what actually did fail in the
config.log it produces.
Every time.
2010/4/30 R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
Hello there,
I4m trying to compile firebird 2.0.5 from source on openbsd 4.4
I Have the follow error:
# ./configure
checking whether
Hups
# apache2 -v
Server version: Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu)
Server built: Mar 9 2010 20:45:36
Requests per second:125.07 [#/sec] (mean)
# apache2 -v
Server version: Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu)
Server built: Nov 13 2009 22:06:57
Requests per second:10108.85 [#/sec] (mean)
Are you using
On Mon, 3 May 2010, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz
Apache 1.3.29
Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean)
Apache 2.2.2
Requests per second:375.02 [#/sec] (mean)
Apache2 is significantly more complex:
ktrace -f /tmp/a2-ktrace.log -di
On Mon, 3 May 2010 10:10:01 +0300
Dexter Tomisson dexterto...@gmail.com wrote:
This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh
everyday :):
ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz
Apache 1.3.29
Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean)
Apache 2.2.2
Requests per
NewsLetter
2010/4/29 Torbjxrn H. Orskaug torbjorn.orsk...@gmail.com:
2010/4/29 Peter Hessler phess...@theapt.org:
what happens if you remove and reinsert the power cord, does it do the
same thing?
Yep.
Just a quick update on this. I recompiled my kernel with ACPI_DEBUG
enabled and I can see that
On 05/02/10 21:20, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Well, /usr/ports is updated, but never needs to be erased unless really
messed up by user error
That's true of /usr/src too though, right?
Here is a guess:
Perhaps
Just for update. OpenSolaris in VM
Server Software:Apache/2.2.14
Requests per second:396.00 [#/sec] (mean)
Server Software:Apache/1.3.41
Requests per second:1284.49 [#/sec] (mean)
Comparing it with previous results from Ubuntu and your results it
seems to be very useful
person who doesn't check the archives why doesn't openbsd do X?
person who does check the archives the license is not acceptable |
benchmarking tools don't tell the full story | you do not understand the
security implications of what you suggest
in your case it's all 3 of the above. get a
On 2010-05-03, Dexter Tomisson dexterto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 May 2010 03:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :)
This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh
everyday :):
ab -n 1 -c 10
On 2010-04-30, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
Hello there,
I4m trying to compile firebird 2.0.5 from source on openbsd 4.4
I Have the follow error:
# ./configure
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking build system type... i386-unknown-openbsd4.4
checking host system
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Luis Useche use...@gmail.com wrote:
Reading some archives, I found people saying that OpenBSD has no disk
scheduler. My first question is: is this true? If so, what is the reason? Is
it technical or there are no resources for this?
OpenBSD has a disk scheduler,
With apache 1.3 being simpler I would imagine it has more scope for
speed than apache 2.
Which is faster, would be interesting but testing has to be thought out
well, depending on what you are hoping to prove. ab can be used for
some comparison tests but wouldn't reflect performance for live
Hi,
On Wed, 17.03.2010 at 17:48:21 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net
wrote:
On Mon, 15.03.2010 at 19:10:12 +0100, Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net
wrote:
# pfctl -s a |grep mss
# ifconfig|grep mtu|grep -v 1500
lo0: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 33152
enc0:
Hello!
I've recently rediscovered a computer that I'd been using as a
Linux fileserver a few years ago. Since it's hardware is
considerably better than the even older machine I'm using now as
an OpenBSD fileserver, I tried if I could make it run.
In principle, everything works fine, to some
Caso nco esteja visualizando esse e-mail, veja na versco online
56 Tipos de listas diferentes contendo mais de 7.257.860 e-mails.
Divulgue os seus produtos e Servigos pela Internet de modo FACIL e
ECONTMICO.
TODAS AS LISTAS EM ATE 12 X NO CARTAO !
Conhega os nossos produtos e as nossas
May 19 OpenBSD 4.7 will be released, may 20 there will be a release party in
Amsterdam.
The plan is the same as usual:
18:00 gathering in front of De Deugniet, we will find some food in the
neighborhood that has lots of places where we can eat.
From 20:00 on we will gather into De Deugniet
OpenBSD does more when running each process for security reasons and so
is arguably slower than Linux, but also does less by default and so is
faster than most distros. It's still blisteringly fast, especially where
it counts and if I had to choose one OS to use it would be OpenBSD.
I
On 05/02/10 20:31, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
OpenBSD's stock httpd is very slow and outdated. It is about 6 years old.
Almost an abandonware.
I will print this mail and laugh everyday with it. :)
Ya, me too. It'll sit beside your laughable emails where you argued
that the
wow what a useful comparison.
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:04:45PM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote:
OpenBSD does more when running each process for security reasons and so
is arguably slower than Linux, but also does less by default and so is
faster than most distros. It's still
Yes, we have some new cd's,
We have some new cd's today, ole! ;)
Prior silly exuberance probably has no meaning to the younger
generation. Maybe some other old farts like me will recall the
song it's a parodying. ;)
Complete package arrived unscathed. Even a cool sticker on the
outside of the
22 matches
Mail list logo
