On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> > Those who taste the de Raadt wrath, however, always run in the end. A friend
> > of mine once incurred his ire by asking the wrong question at the wrong
> > time,
> > and Theo de Raadt hacked his router and remotely remapped his keyboard!
>
> hahaha
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
> > Those who taste the de Raadt wrath, however, always run in the end. A
> friend
> > of mine once incurred his ire by asking the wrong question at the wrong
> time,
> > and Theo de Raadt hacked his router and remotely remapped his keyboard!
On Jun 10, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 09:18 PM, E.T wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
>> watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive
>> for a complete solution. I also looked at the soluti
> Those who taste the de Raadt wrath, however, always run in the end. A friend
> of mine once incurred his ire by asking the wrong question at the wrong time,
> and Theo de Raadt hacked his router and remotely remapped his keyboard!
hahahahahaha, slander? Hilarious either way.
--
Samuel Baldwin
He is just trolling...
Just look at his postings...
On 6/10/10 4:06 PM, E.T wrote:
My main
question and therefore, is that OpenBSD supports a 100%, the atom D510?.
The X server is configured with more time. But there will be no more bugs
or conflicts later, more severe and troublesome.
Same URL as earlier today.
You should check the archive fir
All,
I'm having a really strange issue with a 4.7 box running -stable and the
option "fib-update no" in ospfd.conf:
Here's my ospfd.conf:
# cat /etc/ospfd.conf
# $OpenBSD: ospfd.conf,v 1.4 2007/06/19 16:49:56 reyk Exp $
# Global Config
router-id ***.***.***.***
fib-update no
area 0.0.0.31 {
Hi
I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150 tested
with OpenBSD 4.7.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:17:27 +0200, Dusty wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed OpenBSD 4.7 Release on my laptop, an Acer Aspire
> One with SSD. Enjoying the improved performance I decided I wanted
very, very small processor. N270 best performance? . Firewall or desktop ?
>
> OpenBSD 4.6-current (RAMDISK_CD) #149: Mon Sep 14 04:31:59 MDT 2009
> t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
> cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
> 1.60
In fact, there is color, the buttons work. That's cool :)
Tanks
> Maybe, but it beats the pants off the old Asus eeePC I had. It's a
> netbook. I use it for portable productivity, coding, testing and web
> surfing... not as an Internet gateway/FW.
--
@plus
FRLinux wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
> wrote:
>>> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
>> Okay, but what is your question?
>
>
> I guess he is asking if all Atom processors are compatible with
> OpenBSD, which i guess is pretty much a given :)
Hi
In this text, I have a athlon1 available. But it takes a lot of
room, very hot, a lot of noise, and consumes much electricity. I try to
disconnect the fan to see, but the CPU temperature was up to 105 B0 C in 5
minutes. Otherwise, OpenBSD operating nickel above, I installed all the
packets, X-
On 6/10/10 2:41 PM, FRLinux wrote:
I guess he is asking if all Atom processors are compatible with
OpenBSD, which i guess is pretty much a given :)
My question (sorry for hijacking this thread) is : is there any people
on this list who switched from soekris (geode) to atom, and are they
happy wi
E.T wrote:
> very, very small processor. N270 best performance? . Firewall or desktop ?
>
>
>> OpenBSD 4.6-current (RAMDISK_CD) #149: Mon Sep 14 04:31:59 MDT 2009
>> t...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
>> cpu0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz ("GenuineIntel" 6
The same view of "or"ing items should then apply to tables as well, as does
the use of "{" "}" as macro expansion,
and we all know this not true.
It is also true that "{" and "}" elsewhere are not simple macro expansion.
If they were simple macro expansion then
Block {in out} from addr
Would b
yes, exactly !!!
See my complete post before.
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:02:23 -0400, Brad Tilley
wrote:
> FRLinux wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
>> wrote:
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
>>> Okay, but what is your question?
>>
>>
>> I g
FRLinux wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
Okay, but what is your question?
I guess he is asking if all Atom processors are compatible with
OpenBSD, which i guess is pretty much a given :)
My question (s
Hi
I've recently installed OpenBSD 4.7 Release on my laptop, an Acer Aspire
One with SSD. Enjoying the improved performance I decided I wanted to
follow current. I was hoping for webcam and ath0 support. (Apparently
I'm SOL when it comes to the ath0, its one of 'those' chipsets that
doesn't wo
On Thu, June 10, 2010 12:18 pm, E.T wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
> watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive
> for a complete solution. I also looked at the solution Soekris but is
> expensive compared to D510mo from
On 06/10/2010 09:18 PM, E.T wrote:
Hi all
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive
for a complete solution. I also looked at the solution Soekris but is
expensive compared to D510mo from Intel.
Well it
This is somewhat an extension of the thread "No SSH on External Interfaces
After pf.conf Rewrite for Load Balancing Outgoing Traffic" that Devin helped
me out with, but I started a new thread with a new title so other searching
might find it correctly.
I have one last issue since I moved to Ope
Hi,
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 20:27:22 +0200
Markus Hennecke wrote:
> >> A guy
> >> working at Strato told me that it was left out for marketing reasons
> >> to make the virtual servers look better.
> >
> > He seems to be wrong.
>
> I think I did not formulate the sentence right, he said that they lef
> The same view of "or"ing items should then apply to tables as well, as does
> the use of "{" "}" as macro expansion,
> and we all know this not true.
You are making up rules as you go along. Why don't you go read the code?
> It is also true that "{" and "}" elsewhere are not simple macro exp
E.T wrote:
> Hi
>
> In this text, I have a athlon1 available. But it takes a lot of
> room, very hot, a lot of noise, and consumes much electricity. I try to
> disconnect the fan to see, but the CPU temperature was up to 105 B0 C in 5
> minutes. Otherwise, OpenBSD operating nickel above, I instal
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:32:56 +0200
"E.T" wrote:
> Hi
>
> I also crash X server. My graphics controller is an Intel GMA 3150
> tested with OpenBSD 4.7.
Don't hijack threads.
Search the mailinglist first.
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:08:04PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
> > I (and I realize I was wrong ) always considered that
> >
> > pass quick from { addr 1, addr2 }
> >
> > Could be written as
> >
> > pass quick from addr1
> > pass quick from addr2
> >
> > put if "!" are used this obvious shoul
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
>> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
> Okay, but what is your question?
I guess he is asking if all Atom processors are compatible with
OpenBSD, which i guess is pretty much a given :)
My question (sorry for hijack
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:08:04PM -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
> I (and I realize I was wrong ) always considered that
>
> pass quick from { addr 1, addr2 }
>
> Could be written as
>
> pass quick from addr1
> pass quick from addr2
>
> put if "!" are used this obvious should not be true
>
> pas
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:08:04 -0400
Peter Fraser wrote:
Hi,
> I (and I realize I was wrong ) always considered that
>
> pass quick from { addr 1, addr2 }
>
> Could be written as
>
> pass quick from addr1
> pass quick from addr2
This is true.
> put if "!" are used this obvious should not be
You can use an Atom, I'm using a 1.6GHz dual-core version on my home
firewall. It is more than sufficient for small-medium traffic.
On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:18 PM, "E.T" wrote:
Hi all
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are les
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:18:44PM +0200, E.T wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD.
Okay, but what is your question?
Joachim
Am 10.06.2010 14:08, schrieb Joerg Zinke:
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:07:08 +0200
Markus Hennecke wrote:
Am 09.06.2010 20:35, schrieb umaxx:
I have a "PowerServer M" with Opteron 1210 which runs fine with
4.7-stable and native(!) IPv6.
Does the "PowerServer M" still got the serial console
Am 10.06.2010 14:10, schrieb Alexander Farber:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Markus Hennecke
wrote:
I still got the old "M" server with the athlon and I
have to disable ACPI to make it run correctly.
Markus, how do you disable ACPI, with some Linux command?
I am running OpenBSD on th
Hi all
I would like to make a firewall / router running OpenBSD. I
watch the ARM processors / Geode but they are less powerful and expensive
for a complete solution. I also looked at the solution Soekris but is
expensive compared to D510mo from Intel.
In the doc OpenBSD i386:
http://openbsd.org
Peter Fraser wrote:
> man pf.conf never describes what "!" does. The "!" is used in some examples
> and
> a lot of the time is obvious what will happens. The pf faq has somewhat more
> of
> an explanation of "!" with multiple address, but its explanation only refers
> to the
> use of "!" in ta
man pf.conf never describes what "!" does. The "!" is used in some examples
and
a lot of the time is obvious what will happens. The pf faq has somewhat more
of
an explanation of "!" with multiple address, but its explanation only refers
to the
use of "!" in tables. There is never any statement
* Kevin Chadwick [2010-06-10 18:08]:
> > no. it is imposing limits that should not be there and that the new pf
> > core does not require any more.
> Is it not even slightly required or would a warning message be
> appropriate.
warnings are useless
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openb
> no. it is imposing limits that should not be there and that the new pf
> core does not require any more.
>
Is it not even slightly required or would a warning message be
appropriate.
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:43:58PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:11:48 +0200
> Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:39:24PM +0200, Peter Spekreijse wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > >> On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to
> > > >> another. F
> Man, it's not me. Just wanted to share that with you all.
Like a dick in a pudding.
You may want to share it with us all but no-one else wants you to.
Meaning of words is what's important and from what I've seen, theo meant
very little which you have taken to heart. From the few examples I've
On Thursday 10 June 2010 06:04:21 Alexander Farber wrote:
> I was hoping for some interesting arguments
>
> But there was just whining about Theo's personality
> (with which I don't agree) and lack of some drivers
> (blobs - no thank you)
Why?
What can possibly be said that will change anything?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:11:48 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:39:24PM +0200, Peter Spekreijse wrote:
> > Hi!
> > >> On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to
> > >> another. First we moved the IP to the other interface and after
> > >> that we removed the
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 12:35:36 +0200
Reyk Floeter wrote:
> but please a little bit before using it in production networks,
> iked(8) is not fully ready yet ;-).
I'm following your commit flow about it and is exiting, this is why I'm
still with OpenBSD ;)
--
Massimo
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 03:39:24PM +0200, Peter Spekreijse wrote:
> Hi!
> >> On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to another.
> >> First we moved the IP to the other interface and after that we removed
> >> the old VLAN interface. Now we notice that the old link stays in the
>
I AM truly amazed, "people can't read" is indeed a fact.
Hi!
>> On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to another.
>> First we moved the IP to the other interface and after that we removed
>> the old VLAN interface. Now we notice that the old link stays in the
>> OSFP fib.
>>
>> ospfctl sh fib
>>
>>
>>
>> *C0 xx.yy.233.160
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:04:14 +0200
Alexander Farber wrote:
> I was wondering that as well, since Strato doesn't mention
> "Remote Console" in the description of its "PowerServer L" and "M".
> And without that you probably can't install OpenBSD there?
> (I've seen a web page though, which somehow
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Alexander Farber
wrote:
> I was wondering that as well, since Strato doesn't mention
> "Remote Console" in the description of its "PowerServer L" and "M".
> And without that you probably can't install OpenBSD there?
> (I've seen a web page though, which somehow use
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Markus Hennecke
wrote:
> I still got the old "M" server with the athlon and I
> have to disable ACPI to make it run correctly.
>
Markus, how do you disable ACPI, with some Linux command?
Thanks
Alex
Hi,
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:07:08 +0200
Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Am 09.06.2010 20:35, schrieb umaxx:
> >
> > I have a "PowerServer M" with Opteron 1210 which runs fine with
> > 4.7-stable and native(!) IPv6.
> >
> Does the "PowerServer M" still got the serial console option?
Yes, I used serial c
I was wondering that as well, since Strato doesn't mention
"Remote Console" in the description of its "PowerServer L" and "M".
And without that you probably can't install OpenBSD there?
(I've seen a web page though, which somehow used VMWare for that...)
After some consideration, I've decided to b
LeviaComm Networks NOC wrote:
... hell the word troll is in the URL.
LOL!
and in the last day, god said: "DON'T FEED THE TROLLS!"
KOB] ARGE BA^LANGIG PROGRAMI
T\B]TAK , KOB] lerin mevcut |r|nlerini geli~tirebilmeleri , firma igi yeni
|r|n |retilmesi ,katma deper yaratan (fiyat , kalite, mukavemet,kullan}m
kolayl}p} vs..) gal}~malar}n gergekle~tirilmesi igin 400.000 YTL ye kadar
geri vdemesiz 'hibe' destepi saplamaktad}r
What a waste of bytes..
Which planet did you come from?
Well, at least, are you able to read?
On 10 June 2010 12:10, S H wrote:
> Dexter,
>
> I'm still relatively new to OpenBSD and the community, however a few
> days ago you had asked about why large memory support still wasn't
> enabled by
I was hoping for some interesting arguments
But there was just whining about Theo's personality
(with which I don't agree) and lack of some drivers
(blobs - no thank you)
Yes, Theo is an asshole.
Let me cut my own throat to prove I'm a good guy!.
Yea!!
BTW, Theo *IS* an asshole.
Most geniuses are ...
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:28 +0300, "Dexter Tomisson"
wrote:
> http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:59:53AM +0200, Peter Spekreijse wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to another.
> First we moved the IP to the other interface and after that we removed
> the old VLAN interface. Now we notice that the old link stays in the
> OSFP f
Hello,
I was myself trying to figure out how to use both unicode and cyrillic in
openbsd but, surfing the net, I haven't yet found a working howto on the
matter. Trying to alter LANG or LC_ALL has just sorted out complains from
the os during login, but no effect (actual locale is still "C").
Basi
Hi!
On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to another.
First we moved the IP to the other interface and after that we removed
the old VLAN interface. Now we notice that the old link stays in the
OSFP fib.
ospfctl sh fib
*C0 xx.yy.233.160/28 link#62
C4
Dexter,
I'm still relatively new to OpenBSD and the community, however a few
days ago you had asked about why large memory support still wasn't
enabled by default. Asking if the developers needed hardware, funding
or what not to get it working properly.
If you were in fact a developer as your l
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
> Man, it's not me. Just wanted to share that with you all.
>
> On 10 June 2010 11:40, Dunceor wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Dexter Tomisson
>> wrote:
>> > http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
>> >
>> >
On 6/10/2010 1:44 AM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dexter Tomissonwrote:
http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
It's always funny when somebody ends up "leaving for their own good", that
they need to write a lot about it and try to convince many
Man, it's not me. Just wanted to share that with you all.
On 10 June 2010 11:40, Dunceor wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Dexter Tomisson
> wrote:
> > http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
> >
> >
>
> Ok why write a long text and the only reason you have is that you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
> http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
>
>
It's always funny when somebody ends up "leaving for their own good", that
they need to write a lot about it and try to convince many others to agree
with their notions.
Develop/
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Dexter Tomisson wrote:
> http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
>
>
Ok why write a long text and the only reason you have is that you are
unhappy with driver support and with Theo? I was looking for some more
indepth discussion on why you choose
http://www.trollaxor.com/2010/06/why-i-left-openbsd.html
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:47 AM, patrick keshishian wrote:
>
> you realize obsd4.5 isn't supported any longer since 4.7 was released.
Fair enough. I've managed to get 4.7 working by reverting
/sys/dev/pci/pci.c to 1.72, as suggested in that thread, so I guess
I'll try that.
Cheers,
Patrick
--
Hi!
On a OpenBSD 4.6 router we have moved an IP from one VLAN to another.
First we moved the IP to the other interface and after that we removed
the old VLAN interface. Now we notice that the old link stays in the
OSFP fib.
ospfctl sh fib
*C0 xx.yy.233.160/28 link#62
C4
68 matches
Mail list logo
