Re: dhcpd knob
On 6/20/10 6:43 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:38:10 -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote: I can vouch for the water in India. Which is no doubt the reason that Mr Tata supplied us with crates of bottled water when we were working there? So you could vouch for it? We were instructed not to even use tap water in the Taj Residency to brush our teeth... why would someone not want to drink water from the ganges? the charred semi-decomposed bits of corpses really brings out the rest of the flavors. OK people, I meant to say that I can vouch that the water is bad. If someone wants to read otherwise, it's a free country. I found the comparison apt and thus commented. Mehma
Re: dhcpd knob
You missed main point. Theo is not known as someone politically correct ;-) But that's why this is system is so fine. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Mehma Sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/20/10 6:43 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: Rod Whitworth wrote: On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:38:10 -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote: I can vouch for the water in India. Which is no doubt the reason that Mr Tata supplied us with crates of bottled water when we were working there? So you could vouch for it? We were instructed not to even use tap water in the Taj Residency to brush our teeth... why would someone not want to drink water from the ganges? the charred semi-decomposed bits of corpses really brings out the rest of the flavors. OK people, I meant to say that I can vouch that the water is bad. If someone wants to read otherwise, it's a free country. I found the comparison apt and thus commented. Mehma
Re: dhcpd knob
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote: On 18 Jun, patric conant wrote: Is there a line to be added to dhcpd.conf to tell dhcpd to attempt to update bind9 with hostnames from dhcp client, BIND is configured to allow updates from the lan, and dhcpd and BIND are running on the same machine, I've seen other bind implementations that do this by default, and others still that have a knob in dhcpd.conf, but nothing in dhcpd's man pages seem to say either way. you need at least isc dhcp version 3.X for dynamic updates - openbsd ships with something older last time i checked. a isc dhcp 3.something package is available. we don't ship with something older. what we ship has been audited, seperated, rinsed, and made extra clean and unscary. the changes are very substantial. anyone is welcome to run the official isc stuff if they want. they're also welcome to drink the water in india. What is wrong with the water in India? We drink it all the time and got no probs :-) Dont take it from the tap take it from the pond directly if you dont like chlorine ;-) --Siju
Herramientas para la Construccion y Mas - misc
HERRAMIENTAS PARA LA CONSTRUCCION Y MAS * ANDAMIOS TUBULARES * ACCESORIOS DE SEGURIDAD * CABALLETES EXTENSIBLES * ELEVADOR PARA PLACAS DE DURLOCK O KNAUF * ESCALERAS TIPO BURROS * TORRES DE ELEVACION DE MATERIALES * TRIBUNAS Y GRADAS * CARROS RECOLECTORES * VALLAS CERRAMIENTOS * GUINCHES * PLUMAS * LINEA CARRITOS www.nuevosairesnet.com.ar e mail manunuevosai...@coopenetcolon.com.ar
Re: X hangs with Intel GM965 Acceleration
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 04:20:29PM +0200, Elmar Bschorer wrote: Hi list, I have a thinkpad T61 running OpenBSD 4.7 (amd64). Whenever I try to start X with UXA Acceleration for my intel 956GM graphic card I end up with a black Screen and X hangs :-( My System even does not react to any Ctrl + Alt + F(X) anymore. I can only power off the system :-( Unfortunately I need the UXA Acceleration, because X is terribly slow without any Acceleration. You should be using EXA acceleration (the default in 4.7) without kernel memory management (which is present in current, but not in 4.7). Also, why do you need an xorg.conf? Nothing in that configuration file cannot be autodetected by X itself. -0- -- We must remember the First Amendment which protects any shrill jackass no matter how self-seeking. -- F. G. Withington
Convención Nacional de Secretarias y Asistentes - Ixtapa 2010
[IMAGE] ConvenciC3n Nacional Secretarias y Asistentes Ixtapa Zihuatanejo [IMAGE] 23 y 24 de Julio de 2010 [IMAGE] NH Krystal - Ixtapa Zihuatanejo [IMAGE] Viernes 9:00 am - 7:00 pm Sabado 9:00 am a 2:00 pm La ciudad de Ixtapa Zihuatanejo, ubicado frente a las playas del PacCfico Mexicano, se convierte en la sede de la ConvenciC3n Nacional Secretarias y Asistentes 2010, esplC)ndido lugar para disfrutar las maravillas de la naturaleza, donde la experiencia serC! inolvidable. Conmemorando el DCa de la Secretaria y Asistente en CONGRESS MARKETING, hemos diseC1ado un programa de actualizaciC3n en el cual Especialistas en materia expondrC!n al participante herramientas necesarias para que sus actividades en la oficina estC)n acompaC1adas de calidad, estrategia y profesionalismo. Para nuestro segundo dCa disfrutaremos en grupo de actividades recreativas programadas para el esparcimiento de nuestros participantes, visitando la Isla de Ixtapa. Algunos de los temas generales b La Imagen de Alto Impacto b AtenciC3n Ejecutiva de primera clase b Un Exitoso Plan de Vida Laboral b AdministraciC3n efectiva del tiempo b y Muchos MC!s Un Evento de Congress Marketing [IMAGE] Lic. Edith Curiel Sales Development Representative Line 1: +52 (33) 1201-6898 Line 2: +52 (33) 1562-1784 Line 3: +52 (33) 3110-6502 [IMAGE] PromociC3n Especial a Grupos Copyright (C) 2010, Congress Marketing Online S.C. Derechos reservados. Congress Marketing, El logo de Congress Marketing, y Congress Marketing Online S.C. son marcas registradas y/o sus filiales en Estados Unidos, Canada, Colombia, Brasil y Uruguay. ADVERTENCIA Congress Marketing no cuenta con alianzas estrategicas de ningun tipo dentro de la republica mexicana. NO SE DEJE ENGACAR - DIGA NO A LA PIRATERIA. Todos los logotipos, marcas comerciales e imC!genes son propiedad de sus respectivas corporaciones y se utilizan con fines informativos solamente. Este Mensaje ha sido enviado a misc@openbsd.org como usuario de Congress Marketing o bien un usuario le refirio para recibir este newsletter. Como usuario de Congress Marketing, en este acto autoriza de manera expresa que Congress Marketing le puede contactar vCa correo electrC3nico u otros medios. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, haga caso omiso de el y reporte su cuenta respondiendo este correo con el subject BAJA CM000SCRMZ. Unsubscribe to this mailing list, reply a blank message withe the subject UNSUBSCRIBE CM000SCRMZ Tenga en cuenta que la gestiC3n de nuestras bases de datos es de suma importancia y no es intenciC3n de la empresa la inconformidad del receptor.
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
did the following: after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting applied: # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src* using *cvsroot=anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs* Then downloaded: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7.tar.gz and applied: cd /usr/src patch -p0 001_kerberos.patch as referred in: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7/common/001_kerberos.patch Thanks Tony On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.netwrote: On 06/18/10 09:42, Tony Berth wrote: when trying to patch a new i386 installation with the first patch I get the following: ... Patching file kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3463 (offset 12 lines). Hunk #2 failed at 3543. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3607 (offset 7 lines). 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej done you did something wrong. You didn't tell us what you did, so that's the most I can^Wwill say. For giggles, I just tested it against the 4.7 source, and (surprise!) it worked just fine. So, start with faq5, starting at the top, and work your way through at least to 5.4 (10.15 would be a good read after 5.1-5.4) and see if you can find what variation from the proper process that you felt was harmless or what command you typed in blindly without understanding what it meant and how it interacted with other things. (and yes, I have a pretty good idea what you did, and understanding faq5.html will set you straight. Assuming you can pick and chose which parts you read is how you got in trouble. It is a dense read, but pretty important to understanding what you were trying to do here. It is worth the time to understand...) Nick. /nfs1/test $ patch -p0 001_kerberos.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |Apply by doing: | cd /usr/src | patch -p0 001_kerberos.patch | |Rebuild and install the Kerberos 5 library: | cd lib/libkrb5 | make obj | make depend | make | make install | |And then rebuild and install the Kerberos 5 KDC: | cd ../../kerberosV/libexec/kdc | make obj | make depend | make | make install | | |Index: kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c |=== |RCS file: /cvs/src/kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c,v |retrieving revision 1.10 |diff -p -u -p -u -r1.10 crypto.c |--- kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c6 Oct 2006 07:09:10 - 1.10 |+++ kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c30 Mar 2010 17:17:43 - -- Patching file kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 3451. Hunk #2 succeeded at 3531. Hunk #3 succeeded at 3600. done
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:03:08PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote: did the following: after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting applied: # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src* using *cvsroot=anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs* That gets you -stable. Don't apply patches to that; just rebuild the system from it (http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Bld). Joachim
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010, Tony Berth wrote: From: Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com To: Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net Cc: misc@openbsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:03:08 Subject: Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej did the following: after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting applied: # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src* using *cvsroot=anon...@anoncvs.fr.openbsd.org:/cvs* I think you missed the line: The OPENBSD_4_7 tag contains the release sources and errata already applied. in: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting which would explain the failure to apply patches which are already applied. Then downloaded: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7.tar.gz and applied: cd /usr/src patch -p0 001_kerberos.patch as referred in: ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/4.7/common/001_kerberos.patch -- Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK d.h.da...@bath.ac.uk Phone: +44 1225 386101
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
Tony Berth wrote: did the following: after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting applied: # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src* ... now, as I suggested, go read FAQ5 and find out what this does. (and yes, I guessed right. :) Nick.
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I just want to patch an existing system! Instead of '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src' I applied '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src' in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error! On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.netwrote: Tony Berth wrote: did the following: after navigating to: http://openbsd.org/anoncvs.html#starting applied: # *cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src* ... now, as I suggested, go read FAQ5 and find out what this does. (and yes, I guessed right. :) Nick.
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com writes: Instead of '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src' I applied '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src' in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error! That command would get most likey you -current source, so it's no surprise the patch doesn't apply cleanly. If you want -current, the best advice is to install a snapshot and take it from there (or just keep fetching snapshots). On the other hand, if you want 4.7-stable, check out the 4.7 source and apply the errata patches. - P -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
Tony Berth tonybe...@googlemail.com writes: but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I just want to patch an existing system! [bla bla bla didn't read the docs] http://openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches http://openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Flavors -- Guillaume Pinot http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/~pinot/ + Les grandes personnes ne comprennent jamais rien toutes seules, et c'est fatigant, pour les enfants, de toujours leur donner des explications... ; -- Antoine de Saint-Exupiry, Le Petit Prince () ASCII ribbon campaign -- Against HTML e-mail /\ http://www.asciiribbon.org -- Against proprietary attachments
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
Hi Tony, Tony Berth wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200: but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I just want to patch an existing system! http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches Note that this one doesn't talk about cvs checkout at all, but recommends different ways to get the RELEASE sources. Instead of '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src' I applied '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src' in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error! None of these is RELEASE. If you want to understand what these two commands do, follow Nick's advice and read FAQ 5. Granted, that's not required for patching your system, but maybe you want to understand what you are doing and why it fails... Sometimes, it *is* useful to read a bit more than the bare minimum required to type the right commands, in order to be able to understand your own errors and become able to help yourself. Yours, Ingo
Re: HP Compaq 6005 hanging on boot
Hi, that is indeed the weirdest thing I've heard in a while :)
I just tried it on the computer that fails, but I'm testing this with
OpenBSD on a USB stick and when it detects a CD and I don't actually
boot from it, it just boots from the harddrive instead. (Not from the
USB which is next in the boot-order)
I will try to find time tomorrow, and install it on a harddive and try
this trick again.
FWIW I got a tip off-list about putting some debug info in
/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/stand/libsa/memprobe.c to try to figure out
where it stops, and it seems to be this chunk of code at line 75:
__asm __volatile(DOINT(0x15) ; setc %b1
: =a (sig), =d (rc), =b (off)
: 0 (0xE820), 1 (0x534d4150), b (off),
c (sizeof(*mp)), D (((u_int)mp) 0xF)
: cc, memory);
I just put a printf() before and after this code and it prints the one
before it and then it just freezes.
(See diff below. This gives the output
probing: pc0 pci mem[Debug1Debug2
)
I don't know if this is helpful at all, but if someone have a diff
they want me to test or something I'll be happy to recompile boot
again and test it here.
Or maybe the bios is so badly broken that the real fix for this
would be in the form of a bios-update from HP?
I'll look for that too.
Thanks!
--- memprobe99.c~ Mon Jun 21 19:41:34 2010
+++ memprobe.c Mon Jun 21 19:43:08 2010
@@ -68,17 +68,17 @@
bios_E820(bios_memmap_t *mp)
{
int rc, off = 0, sig, gotcha = 0;
-
+ printf(Debug1);
do {
BIOS_regs.biosr_es = ((u_int)(mp) 4);
-
+ printf(Debug2);
__asm __volatile(DOINT(0x15) ; setc %b1
: =a (sig), =d (rc), =b (off)
: 0 (0xE820), 1 (0x534d4150), b (off),
c (sizeof(*mp)), D (((u_int)mp) 0xF)
: cc, memory);
off = BIOS_regs.biosr_bx;
-
+ printf(Debug3);
if (rc 0xff || sig != 0x534d4150)
break;
gotcha++;
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:41:01PM -0500, Todd Alan Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
wrote:
This is most likely a bios issue and I hoped my little trick helped you
past the bios boot part.
Yeah, me too. I guess I'll have to look for a BIOS update, though I'm
not very optimistic that one exists.
By the way, I don't understand why your trick would work in any
situation. I didn't think anything persists beyond a reboot. I am
really puzzled that it works in some situations. Weird.
The cd boot trick moves memory around enough. You don't want to know
how bios is written and this is one of those examples that proves how
bad it really is.
HP/compaq really know how to be incompatible.
Yeah, no doubt.
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
Ingo Schwarze wrote: Hi Tony, Tony Berth wrote on Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:11:31PM +0200: but FAQ5 is about 'Building the System from Source' which I don't want! I just want to patch an existing system! http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#Patches Note that this one doesn't talk about cvs checkout at all, but recommends different ways to get the RELEASE sources. Instead of '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P -rOPENBSD_4_7 src' I applied '# cd /usr; cvs checkout -P src' in order to get the current tree but patch001 still gives the same error! None of these is RELEASE. If you want to understand what these two commands do, follow Nick's advice and read FAQ 5. Granted, that's not required for patching your system, but maybe you want to understand what you are doing and why it fails... Sometimes, it *is* useful to read a bit more than the bare minimum required to type the right commands, in order to be able to understand your own errors and become able to help yourself. Yours, Ingo Maybe I'm just being dense, but HOW can you patch a system without building from source? ... unless you have binary patches for all the architectures and that gets much more complicated if you have combinations of patches ...
Re: acpidump on macbook 3,1
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
This is not useful. acpidump -o macbook3_1
is.
And condensed. Here's the result:
/*
RSD PTR: Checksum=197, OEMID=APPLE, RsdtAddress=0xb0fc
*/
/*
RSDT: Length=84, Revision=1, Checksum=143,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x8e,
Creator ID=, Creator Revision=0x113
*/
/*
Entries={ 0xbeeec000, 0xbeeeb000, 0xbeeea000, 0xbeee9000, 0xbeee8000,
0xbeee7000, 0xbeee6000, 0xbeec6000, 0xbeec5000, 0xbeec4000,
0xbeee, 0xbeedf000 }
*/
/*
DSDT=0xbeee1000
INT_MODEL=PIC
SCI_INT=9
SMI_CMD=0xb2, ACPI_ENABLE=0xf0, ACPI_DISABLE=0xf1, S4BIOS_REQ=0xf2
PM1a_EVT_BLK=0x400-0x403
PM1a_CNT_BLK=0x404-0x405
PM2_CNT_BLK=0x420-0x420
PM2_TMR_BLK=0x408-0x40b
PM2_GPE0_BLK=0x428-0x42f
P_LVL2_LAT=101ms, P_LVL3_LAT=1001ms
FLUSH_SIZE=0, FLUSH_STRIDE=0
DUTY_OFFSET=1, DUTY_WIDTH=3
DAY_ALRM=13, MON_ALRM=0, CENTURY=50
Flags={WBINVD,PROC_C1,SLP_BUTTON,RTC_S4}
*/
/*
DSDT: Length=17846, Revision=1, Checksum=59,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=MacBook, OEM Revision=0x30001,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
/*
HPET: Length=56, Revision=1, Checksum=204,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
APIC: Length=104, Revision=1, Checksum=142,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
MCFG: Length=60, Revision=1, Checksum=228,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
ASF!: Length=165, Revision=32, Checksum=182,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
SBST: Length=48, Revision=1, Checksum=132,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
ECDT: Length=83, Revision=1, Checksum=57,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Apple00, OEM Revision=0x1,
Creator ID=Loki, Creator Revision=0x5f
*/
/*
SSDT: Length=1244, Revision=1, Checksum=190,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=CpuPm, OEM Revision=0x3000,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
/*
SSDT: Length=607, Revision=1, Checksum=87,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Cpu0Tst, OEM Revision=0x3000,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
/*
SSDT: Length=166, Revision=1, Checksum=228,
OEMID=APPLE, OEM Table ID=Cpu1Tst, OEM Revision=0x3000,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
/*
SSDT: Length=1348, Revision=1, Checksum=122,
OEMID=SataRe, OEM Table ID=SataPri, OEM Revision=0x1000,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
/*
SSDT: Length=1143, Revision=1, Checksum=187,
OEMID=SataRe, OEM Table ID=SataSec, OEM Revision=0x1000,
Creator ID=INTL, Creator Revision=0x20061109
*/
amdiic0: exec: TimeOut on OpenBSD 4.6
Greetings to All, I'm running OpenBSD 4.6 as a webserver on a Sun X4100 M1 Hardware. I'm currently experiencing some slowness even though i only run a simple web-server with a Mysql backend. Network connections seem to be fine. but dmesg is spitting out the following: amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout amdiic0: exec: op 1, addr 0x2c, cmdlen 1, len 1, flags 0x08: timeout Anyone experience this? Any help would be awesomely appreciated. thanks, -b -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
Any ideas on this crash?
My package builder died this weekend when I couldn't get to it.
I may have hardware problems--I'm not sure. Below is the relevent
data typed in. Any ideas? This is an i386-current system compiled
on June 15th.
Thanks, STeve Andre'
- ps trace data
First bad
/: bad dir ino 14 at offset 69632: mangled entry
panic: bad dir
Stopped at Debugger+0x4: leave
ddb{1}trace
Debugger(d861a1ec,d2ee3000,de2edbac,d2ee3000,0) at Debugger+0x4
panic(d07d10fb,d858cac8,de2edc4c,da2244000,0) at panic+0x55
ufs_dirbad(d858cac8,11000,d07d10ed,1,d8e1e678) at ufs_dirbad+0x45
ufs_lookup(de2edc64,20042,d8c7e00c,0,d08c8c38) at ufs_lookup+0xbc1
VOP_LOOKUP(d861a1ec,de2ede34,de2ede48,20) at VOP_LOOKUP+0x2e
lookup(de2ede24,d8c51c00,400,de2ede3c) at lookup+0x1a0
namei(de2ede24,8223d,0,d8bdbaf0) at namei+0x18c
vn_open(de2ede24,5,0,d8c7e00c) at vn_open+0x33d
sys_open(d8c7e00c,de2edf64,de2edf54,d8c7e00c) at sys_open+0xdb
syscall() at syscall+0x134
ddb{1} mach ddbcpu 0
trace
Debugger(d09ea480,d07200c8,1,de011000,f0) at Debugger+0x4
i386_pip_handler(c0,de2b0058,d0500010,d2ec0010,f8170010) at
i386_ipi_handler+0x4f
Xintrip() at Xintrip+0x47
--- interrupt ---
__mp_lock(d0937084,c6dae6ef,a9ab1383,d8e232b8) at __mp_lock+0c3e
__mp_acquire_count(d0937084,1,de2bde5c,d0392761) at __mp_acquire_count+0x1e
mi_switch(de2bde84,118,de2bde9c,d038f5a2,de2bde84) at mi_switch+0x1e0
sleep_finish(de2bde84,1,118,d07aadb8,d0) at sleep_finish+0xb7
tsleep(d093d348,118,d07aadb8,0,d0203549) at tsleep+0x7a
sys_poll(d8e232b8,de2bdf64,de2bdf54,d8e232b8) at sys_poll+0x299
syscall() at syscall+0x134
--- syscall (number 606643836) ---
0x2:
ps
PIDPPIDPGRP UID SFLAGS WAIT COMMAND
19709 11273 197090 70x2004002find
11273 23607 112730 30x2004082 pause ksh
23607 18011 237070 30x2004080 selectsshd
21064 20013 210640 30x2004082 ttyin ksh
20013 25479 254790 30x282 ttyin script
25479 32642 254790 30x2004082 ttyin script
1400 114000 30x2004082 ttyin getty
24500 1 245000 30x2004082 ttyin getty
12855 1 128550 30x2004082 ttyin getty
9491 194910 30x2004080 ttyin getty
32642 1 326420 30x2004082 pause ksh
30885 1 308850 30x2040180 selectsendmail
22150 1 221500 30x280 selectcron
6484 164840 30x2000180 selectinetd
18011 1 180110 30x280 selectsshd
188499314 21392 83 30x2000180 poll ntpd
9314 21392 21392 83 30x2000180 poll ntpd
21392 1 213920 30x280 poll ntpd
*17369 10592 10592 73 70x2000180syslogd
10592 1 105920 30x288 netio syslogd
21 0 00 30x2100200 bored crypto
20 0 00 30x2100200 aiodoned aiodoned
19 0 00 30x2100200 syncerupdate
18 0 00 30x2100200 cleaner cleaner
17 0 00 3 0x100200 reaperreaper
16 0 00 30x2100200 pgdaemon pgdaemon
15 0 00 30x2100200 pftm pfmurge
14 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb6
13 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb5
12 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb4
11 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb3
10 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb2
9 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb1
8 0 00 30x2100200 usbtskusbtask
7 0 00 30x2100200 usbevtusb0
6 0 00 30x2100200 acpi_idle acpi0
5 0 00 3 0x40100200idle1
4 0 00 30x2100200 bored syswq
3 0 00 3 0x40100200idle0
2 0 00 30x2100200 kmalloc kmthread
1 0 00 30x2104080 wait init
0 -1 00 30x2100200 scheduler swapper
dmesg
OpenBSD 4.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #43: Tue Jun 15 10:29:25 EDT 2010
r...@vista.pls.msu.edu:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.13
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM
real mem = 2144952320 (2045MB)
avail mem = 2067128320 (1971MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 11/30/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xffea0,
SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0450 (76 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version 2.0.8 date 11/30/2006
bios0: Dell Inc.
Re: acpidump on macbook 3,1
On 2010-06-21, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote: This is not useful. acpidump -o macbook3_1 is. And condensed. Here's the result: That creates a bunch of files with names starting macbook3_1. Tar them and point them online somewhere.
pfctl: Cannot allocate memory and spamd-setup -bd
Hi, I have a server with: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #558: Wed Mar 17 20:46:15 MDT 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 234MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 100233216 (95MB) avail mem = 87961600 (83MB) With sendmail and spamd in blacklist (/etc/rc.conf.local): spamd_flags=-bv # for normal use: and see spamd(8) spamd_black=YES # set to YES to run spamd without greylisting spamlogd_flags=-i rl0 # use eg. -i interface and see spamlogd(8) /etc/mail/spamd.conf: with:china:korea: it's ok with:uatraps:china:korea: - pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. or :nixspam::china:korea: - pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. with the shell /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -bd vmstat -m _ pfrke_plain 92196163 1175 429 39435 168 0 88 . In use 2275K, total allocated 3808K; utilization 59.7% pstat -s Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority swap_device 3299800 329980 0%0 In OpenBSD 4.6 the same hardware and config ... no problem. I try several setups: Core2 Duo with 1 GB RAM (the same config) 4.6 and 4.7, works. But ... 4.6 and 4.7 with 128MB, 4.7 give the same error: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. So I change set limit tables 1 set limit table-entries 500 in pf.conf, but no luck. My question is: In this small env. (100 MB - RAM) I need to change the Kernel memory or other sysctl value, which one? I work with OpenBSd for more 10 years Intel, AMD, PPC - Webhosting, Servers, Firewalls. Thank you for your great effort and work. Best regards, Ruy Benton
Re: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory and spamd-setup -bd
avail mem = 87961600 (83MB) with:uatraps:china:korea: - pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. Not enough kernel memory.
Re: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory and spamd-setup -bd
Ruy Bento wrote: Hi, I have a server with: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #558: Wed Mar 17 20:46:15 MDT 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 234MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 100233216 (95MB) avail mem = 87961600 (83MB) With sendmail and spamd in blacklist (/etc/rc.conf.local): spamd_flags=-bv # for normal use: and see spamd(8) spamd_black=YES # set to YES to run spamd without greylisting spamlogd_flags=-i rl0 # use eg. -i interface and see spamlogd(8) /etc/mail/spamd.conf: with:china:korea: it's ok with:uatraps:china:korea: - pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. or :nixspam::china:korea: - pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. with the shell /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -bd vmstat -m _ pfrke_plain 92196163 1175 429 39435 168 0 88 . In use 2275K, total allocated 3808K; utilization 59.7% pstat -s Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority swap_device 3299800 329980 0%0 In OpenBSD 4.6 the same hardware and config ... no problem. I try several setups: Core2 Duo with 1 GB RAM (the same config) 4.6 and 4.7, works. But ... 4.6 and 4.7 with 128MB, 4.7 give the same error: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory. So I change set limit tables 1 set limit table-entries 500 in pf.conf, but no luck. My question is: In this small env. (100 MB - RAM) I need to change the Kernel memory or other sysctl value, which one? I work with OpenBSd for more 10 years Intel, AMD, PPC - Webhosting, Servers, Firewalls. Thank you for your great effort and work. Best regards, Ruy Benton OK, I'm game to ask after seeing Theo's response. I actually have some equipment like this, not that I use it this way, normally. So, change a setting or rewrite things to fit better in this small memory space? I was actually using that laptop to make some pretty extensive website changes last year, while traveling with little internet access. Filled those boring hours while I waked up hours before the world back then. No regrets having brought that old thing with me! :) Chris Bennett
Re: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory and spamd-setup -bd
OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #558: Wed Mar 17 20:46:15 MDT 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 234MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 100233216 (95MB) avail mem = 87961600 (83MB) pstat -s Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority swap_device 3299800 329980 0%0 OK, I'm game to ask after seeing Theo's response. I actually have some equipment like this, not that I use it this way, normally. You're kidding. So, change a setting or rewrite things to fit better in this small memory space? There is no solution. The tables are in kernel memory. The kernel isn't going to go out to swap space to check if packets should flow through. Would anyone want that? No, of course not. I was actually using that laptop to make some pretty extensive website changes last year, while traveling with little internet access. Filled those boring hours while I waked up hours before the world back then. No regrets having brought that old thing with me! :) Laptops tend to have more than 83MB of available memory.
Re: pfctl: Cannot allocate memory and spamd-setup -bd
Theo de Raadt wrote: OpenBSD 4.7 (GENERIC) #558: Wed Mar 17 20:46:15 MDT 2010 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium II (GenuineIntel 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 234MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,MMX real mem = 100233216 (95MB) avail mem = 87961600 (83MB) pstat -s Device 512-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Priority swap_device 3299800 329980 0%0 OK, I'm game to ask after seeing Theo's response. I actually have some equipment like this, not that I use it this way, normally. You're kidding. So, change a setting or rewrite things to fit better in this small memory space? There is no solution. The tables are in kernel memory. The kernel isn't going to go out to swap space to check if packets should flow through. Would anyone want that? No, of course not. I was actually using that laptop to make some pretty extensive website changes last year, while traveling with little internet access. Filled those boring hours while I waked up hours before the world back then. No regrets having brought that old thing with me! :) Laptops tend to have more than 83MB of available memory. No kidding, that sucker only has 128MB, after I added memory. And I'm serious, I really did feel perfectly safe bringing it to parts unknown, where the locals said I really shouldn't be carrying it around in the streets. I still have that antique, right here, working alongside a real computer. But anyway, thanks for answering the question clearly Chris Bennett
King Of Pirate Online Open Beta!
King Of Pirate Online King Of Pirate is a fully 3D-designed multiplayer online game based on 5,000 years of pirate history. In it, comical pirate characters and creatures travel the high seas and encounter intricate story-based quests, wondrous cities and beautiful landscapes in their search for treasures fit for a king or a king's ransom! Though the excitement of ship-to-ship combat is a heady brew for newcomers and veterans alike, many players take pride in their place among the community. Whether you seek to enforce the laws of the KoP world, [1]www.KingOfPirate.com References 1. http://alturl.com/bfk6 This message was sent by: xetgaming, 112 2nd Ave. SE, Kulm, ND 58456 Manage your subscription: http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=9331680l=5098s=N6ZVm=19481c=725423
Re: acpidump on macbook 3,1
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote: On 2010-06-21, Ted Roby ted.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote: This is not useful. acpidump -o macbook3_1 is. And condensed. Here's the result: That creates a bunch of files with names starting macbook3_1. Tar them and point them online somewhere. Sorry about that. http://devio.us/~roby/acpi_macbook3_1.tar
Re: HP Compaq 6005 hanging on boot
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Epidemic SomeGuy epidemic.m...@gmail.com wrote: snip Or maybe the bios is so badly broken that the real fix for this would be in the form of a bios-update from HP? I'll look for that too. There is a BIOS update for the 786F6 systems (which is what I have): http://preview.tinyurl.com/2gxtyu6 Intuitive update instructions are here: http://preview.tinyurl.com/27gfryg The thing is... it doesn't list a BIOS update for Linux. This must be due to the linuxbios that bofh referred to, no? For Windows 7, it just lists the Business Desktops BIOS Utilities (ver. 4.02 Rev. A). For Windows XP Pro and all Windows Vista variations, it lists both the Business Desktops BIOS Utilities (ver. 4.02 Rev. A) and the HP Compaq Business Desktop System BIOS - 786F6 BIOS (ver. 3.10 Rev. A). For Windows 2000, it lists just the 3.10 update. My machine actually shipped with Novell SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, with a BIOS version of 01.09. I'm thinking I ought to try the 3.10 update. Thoughts? Marco?
Re: 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to kerberosV/src/lib/krb5/crypto.c.rej
On 06/21/10 15:05, Tony Abernethy wrote: Maybe I'm just being dense, but HOW can you patch a system without building from source? ... unless you have binary patches for all the architectures and that gets much more complicated if you have combinations of patches ... The difference is building everything vs. building just the parts you need. We do have users in parts of the world where buying on CDs is not just about supporting the project, but also saves massive download times, and the source code on CD is very useful as well. Small patch files make life so much easier for them. It is also an issue with very slow computers, where a complete build may take days. Since most people now consider a 1GHz system slow and have moderately high speed connections, I'm not really sure it matters that much. The time required to patch and build each individual file is pretty substantial and interactive, as opposed to simply checking out the appropriate source and letting it rip and come back a few hours later and have a fully patched system. However, in the time the OP has refused to understand the directions, he could have rebuilt the system on a 66MHz 486DX2 with a bit of off-chip cache...and obviously checking out the code is not a problem for him either. Nick.
Re: HP Compaq 6005 hanging on boot
Sure you install windows on it then install the bios then you blow away wondows again. I don't know the hp magic to update bios'. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:16:29PM -0500, Todd Alan Smith wrote: On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Epidemic SomeGuy epidemic.m...@gmail.com wrote: snip Or maybe the bios is so badly broken that the real fix for this would be in the form of a bios-update from HP? I'll look for that too. There is a BIOS update for the 786F6 systems (which is what I have): http://preview.tinyurl.com/2gxtyu6 Intuitive update instructions are here: http://preview.tinyurl.com/27gfryg The thing is... it doesn't list a BIOS update for Linux. This must be due to the linuxbios that bofh referred to, no? For Windows 7, it just lists the Business Desktops BIOS Utilities (ver. 4.02 Rev. A). For Windows XP Pro and all Windows Vista variations, it lists both the Business Desktops BIOS Utilities (ver. 4.02 Rev. A) and the HP Compaq Business Desktop System BIOS - 786F6 BIOS (ver. 3.10 Rev. A). For Windows 2000, it lists just the 3.10 update. My machine actually shipped with Novell SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10, with a BIOS version of 01.09. I'm thinking I ought to try the 3.10 update. Thoughts? Marco?
Re: HP laptop woes
I only got a couple of offers for real short term loaners. This will help us fix one or two issues but won't help us getting all the issues wrung out. I can think of at least 5 or so issues with the current code on HP machines (not just laptops!) ranging from overheating to busted ACPI tables resulting in crashes. So if you care about making HP machines work properly please step up. I got a few more days left before I travel to the hackathon. Cheers, /marco On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:03:46AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: There has been a huge uptick of ACPI failures on HP laptops. In order to be able to fix this we need to play with one or two. A donation in time for the c2k10 would be greatly appreciated. We need to have the machine(s) in hand by the 25th or so. Two models come to mind: HP4510s HP EliteBook 8530w. Please contact me privately if you want to help getting this fixed. Also if you experience issues with an HP laptop send me the aml (acpidump -o hp_mymodel) and dmesg. I want know what models are currently failing and with what failure.
Re: HP Compaq 6005 hanging on boot
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote: Sure you install windows on it then install the bios then you blow away wondows again. B I don't know the hp magic to update bios'. That's exactly what I was thinking of doing. (The BIOS update instructions are on the HP website.) I'll update this thread afterwards. Thanks for your insight, Marco.
OT: Australia may allow punitive damages for security vulns
http://www.news.com.au/technology/no-anti-virus-software-no-internet-connecti on/story-e6frfro0-1225882656490 Companies who release IT products with security vulnerabilities should be open to claims for compensation by consumers, apparently. Illegal to run without antivirus ... disconnection of vulnerable computers. A much needed kick up the arse for software makers or just bat-shit insane? Coming soon... Mark
Re: OT: Australia may allow punitive damages for security vulns
Illegal to run without antivirus ... disconnection of vulnerable computers. A much needed kick up the arse for software makers or just bat-shit insane? Coming soon... I tend to agree with your last comment. begin article summary Idiotic politicians with no business setting arbitrary rules on something they don't understand... end article summary
Re: OT: Australia may allow punitive damages for security vulns
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:52:30 +1000, mark hellewell wrote: http://www.news.com.au/technology/no-anti-virus-software-no-internet-connecti on/story-e6frfro0-1225882656490 Companies who release IT products with security vulnerabilities should be open to claims for compensation by consumers, apparently. Illegal to run without antivirus ... disconnection of vulnerable computers. A much needed kick up the arse for software makers or just bat-shit insane? Coming soon... Mark Never mind anything else - nobody can prove a negative. There goes the claim for damages. Nobody at OpenBSD would claim that they could guarantee that there is no exploit waiting to be found in the OS. They just make better efforts than anybody else to reduce the chances. The errata page shows that they are forever responding to possible problems publically rather than sneakily (or not at all) like some bigger outfits we could name. MNSHO,
