Kevin Chadwick writes:
>> We didn't see any noticeable increase in
>> spam received or load on content filterning when going to two minutes
>> IIRC. YMMV, may contain nuts etc.
>
> Did you see an increase in legitimate mail getting through without
> whitelisting? Or any getting through sooner?
Director: Dr. Horacio Serebrinsky - Director Acadimico: Dr. Marcelo R.
Ceberio
La Escuela Sistimica
Argentina es una institucisn que desarrolla actividades de formacisn de
Terapeutas familiares sistimicos, investigacisn y asistencia psicolsgica,
en esta ocasisn tenemos el honor de presentar: Semi
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
> order?
The short answer is no. previous discussion:
http://marc.info/?t=12194157011&r=1&w=2
If you are concerned about this, I believe my previous suggestion
> Currently there are about 2^32.7 living humans; I expect to live long
> enough to see 2^33.3
> Imagine everyone having at least two devices. How many do you have?
There's a depression coming along. Many would be glad just to have a
job and food. I don't use any such toys, and probably many will
On 02/02/11 08:59, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
> order?
barely.
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
> a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card.
While checking out NSA I stumbled over your email address online at
http://www.mail-archive.com
Thought you would want to see this MLM Documentary.it is a two year
documentary inside the MLM world
www.TheMLMJourney.com
Duke Kevorkian
813-786-8752
186135
[IMAGE]
!Promociones Especiales para grupos!
Capacitacisn Impartida por: Mtro. Gerardo Coronado Lspez
Pms Capacitacisn Efectiva de Mixico presenta:
Taller de Licitaciones para la LEY de Obras Pzblicas y su Reglamento
Experto Consultor Mtro. Gerardo Coronado Lspez
Empresa Registrada an
2011/2/2 Bret S. Lambert :
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:23:43PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
>> Yeah. And there'll never be more than 2^32 IP devices in the world.
>
> Inorite? I mean, if I can't get an IP for my toaster, I'm just gonna *die*!
Currently there are about 2^32.7 living humans; I exp
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:23:43PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Kevin Chadwick :
> > Also, If you look at the GeoIP lookup data you'll see great swathes were
> > allocated early on and seemingly never actually used.
>
> Yeah. And there'll never be more than 2^32 IP devices in the world
You are probably on the right track.
AFAIK, most Indian ISP's have city or state level blocks of IPs. Ultra
big cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore itself has several blocks. So
theoretically they could NAT the same IP in different cities or
different blocks at the same time, and none the wiser.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> the initial '451 temporary local problem' response). The other, more
> visible issue is when the sender retries from a different IP address,
> and it turns lottery-like in a hurry (sometimes referred to as the
See that? If everybody p
Hello list,
I have a setup with 2 firewalls (openbsd 4.7 MP ) and using carp for
redundancy.
All systems are using the ip number of the inside carp interface as default
gateway.
There is another router in that subnet that is used to reach another network
so i have static route to that network on t
2011/2/2 Kevin Chadwick :
> Also, If you look at the GeoIP lookup data you'll see great swathes were
> allocated early on and seemingly never actually used.
Yeah. And there'll never be more than 2^32 IP devices in the world.
Best
Martin
On 3 February 2011 03:13, wrote:
> Update: I have it on fairly good authority that this behavior is
> considered a bug in the Linux kernel, which will be fixed as soon as
> someone gets around to it. If you are a kernel maintainer and know
> more about this issue, or are willing to fix it, I'd lo
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:35:34 +0100
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> We didn't see any noticeable increase in
> spam received or load on content filterning when going to two minutes
> IIRC. YMMV, may contain nuts etc.
Did you see an increase in legitimate mail getting through with
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:33:31 +0100
pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen) wrote:
> I could offer mine for public consumption, but I would need
> to sanity check it first for outdated data.
If it's no bother to get and post it, then I'd be interested in the
unsanitised data? Even the problematic d
(10 minutes of me helping debug an ssh config problem proceeds this)
15:34 < tobym> oh wow
15:34 < tobym> that fixed it
15:48 < N1JER> tobym: word
15:48 < N1JER> tobym: you should take this time to donate to the openssh
project
15:49 < tobym> time or money? :)
15:49 < N1JER> either
15:49 < N1JER>
OpenBSD Geek writes:
> Do you think, that it will solve my mistake ?
The devil is in the details, as always, but lowering the minimum wait
before retry means that those who retry faster than 25 minutes will
clear greylisting sooner. We didn't see any noticeable increase in
spam received or load
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:53:35 -0600
patric conant wrote:
> 2^24=16,777.216
> So they are close.
I read, the same ips are being used by ISPS in different parts of the
world with a kind of global nat.
Also, If you look at the GeoIP lookup data you'll see great swathes were
allocated early on and se
Si desea seguir recibiendo nuestros avisos, agregue este remitente a su lista
de contactos admitidos. No es considerado SPAM ningzn correo-e mientras
incluya una forma de ser removido:Seccisn 301, parrafo (a)(2)(C) de S.1618.
Bajo el decreto S.1618 titulo 3ro.Aprobado por el 105 congreso base de la
__
Mnbne b m`kncnnaknfemhh OPHA[KH b 2011 cnds.
"OEPEG@CPSGJ@"
11 tebp`k 2011, c.Jheb
(044) 22~91~999
Vek| lepnophrh:
1. P`qqlnrper| `aqnk~rmn mnbs~ qhqrels m`kncnnaknfem
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Manuel Giraud
wrote:
> Jacob Meuser writes:
>
>> foomatic is pretty easy to set up.
>
> Thread hijacker here. I tried to setup a lpd/foomatic for a printer over
> network and always end-up with this kind of message in
> /var/log/lpd-errs:
> --8<---cut h
Do you think, that it will solve my mistake ?
Thank you for your replies, everybody.
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:35:47 +0100, pe...@bsdly.net (Peter N. M. Hansteen)
wrote:
> Kevin Chadwick writes:
>
>> That's a big part of how it works. You can tune the delay with
>> spamd_flags in /etc/rc.conf.local
Comcast has 15.930 million high-speed internet customers.
According to the wikipedia article.
2^24=16,777.216
So they are close.
How about the smartphone market, are they largely being natted?
Or are we likely to see a doubling of the need for IP addresses in the next
couple of years, as non-smar
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
>> who sez that your made up isp has to hand out network-wide unique IPs
>> to his customers?
>
> AFAIK Comcast already has >2^24 customers.
And they seem to be doing just fine. What's the problem again?
Kevin Chadwick writes:
> That's a big part of how it works. You can tune the delay with
> spamd_flags in /etc/rc.conf.local.
yes, a box not too far from here has
spamd_flags="-v -G 2:8:864 -w 1"
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspo
OpenBSD Geek writes:
> But when spamd is enabled, mails take a long time(sometimes a day or less)
> to arrive in our box. Sometimes, we don't receive mails.
> Disabled (spamd), all works fine. I don't understand why it doesn't work
> fine, i read spamd(8) man page.
This sounds like you're seeing
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:39:51 +0400
OpenBSD Geek wrote:
> But when spamd is enabled, mails take a long time(sometimes a day or less)
> to arrive in our box. Sometimes, we don't receive mails.
That's a big part of how it works. You can tune the delay with
spamd_flags in /etc/rc.conf.local.
Some s
My OpenBSD 4.6 system (which is on a Soekris net5501) seems to have a large
number of routes in its IP6 routing table. I don't understand why. For
example:
--snip--
ff02::1:ff00:115%vr1 link#2 UHc0
0 - 4 vr1
ff02::1:ff00:116%vr1
* Martin Schrvder [2011-02-02 18:35]:
> 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> > who sez that your made up isp has to hand out network-wide unique IPs
> > to his customers?
> AFAIK Comcast already has >2^24 customers.
> Any major chinese or indian ISP has or will have >2^24 customers.
> Heck, even DTAG will
Hi,
I use OpenBSD 4.7 Release, with Sendmail MTA.
All works fine, i can send and receive mails on the box.
But when spamd is enabled, mails take a long time(sometimes a day or less)
to arrive in our box. Sometimes, we don't receive mails.
Disabled (spamd), all works fine. I don't understand why i
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:13:04 -0800
travis+ml-openbsd-m...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> I have it on fairly good authority that this behavior is
> considered a bug in the Linux kernel
So what's wrong with user rights and what exactly is the use of this
(when this bug is fixed) apart from for confusio
Errr...sorry for the double-post...it's my first time using a mailing list
and I thought my first e-mail wasn't going through so I sent another
one...please ignore the first post...
There would be more ip adresses if some greedy companies didn't
take a lot of addresses for themselves...
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jean H. Theoret wrote:
> This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
>
> How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment
order?
>
> Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
> a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card
2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> who sez that your made up isp has to hand out network-wide unique IPs
> to his customers?
AFAIK Comcast already has >2^24 customers.
Any major chinese or indian ISP has or will have >2^24 customers.
Heck, even DTAG will probably have >2^24 devices in their network soon.
That seems to have fixed it, thanks!
--Paul
On Feb 2, 2011, at 5:12 AM, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:05:49AM -0500, Paul Suh wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'm running 4.8-stable on one end and 4.5-stable at the other of a
>> site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel. (I'm trying to make su
Has anyone ever gotten OpenVPN to run as a client successfully with a VPN
subscription? OpenBSD seems to be the only OS I can't get OpenVPN up
successfully on for some reason, and I'd like to make it work. So I've
confirmed it's not a server-side issue as I've tested it on other operating
systems a
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 03:52:53PM -0800, Travis H. wrote:
> So I'm curious if there's something in OpenBSD that's similar to the
> "mount -o bind /dir1 /dir2" to make dir1 appear where dir2 is.
For those who asked, one sample use is for something like this:
Starting with the 2.4-series Linux ker
Ok, thanks for the tip. I've removed the settings through sysctl, but
unfortunately I still see those alerts being triggered, then mostly resolved
during the next check.
The system seems to have some issues during heavy UDP session bursts (the
monitoring system issues a stream of requests to a cou
Has anyone been able to successfully use OpenVPN on OpenBSD with a
VPN service? For some reason OpenBSD is the only OS I can't get my
VPN subscription working on and I'd like to make it work.
I am running OpenBSD 4.8-release, on an almost-fresh install. I
only pkg_added openvpn, firefox, scrotw
* Martin Schrvder [2011-02-02 16:45]:
> 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> > * Martin Schrvder [2011-02-02 15:06]:
> >> Unless you are an ISP with more than 2^24 customers.
> > you are talking bullshit. there is oh so much v4 space allocated that
> Currently an ISP with more then 2^24 customers can't NA
2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> * Martin Schrvder [2011-02-02 15:06]:
>> Unless you are an ISP with more than 2^24 customers.
>
> you are talking bullshit. there is oh so much v4 space allocated that
Currently an ISP with more then 2^24 customers can't NAT them all
(as 10/8 has only 2^24 addresses) o
- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text
mode. -
NEVEROVATNA PONUDA ZA SAMOSTALNO UCENJE STRANIH JEZIKA!
na akciji!
Ukoliko ste ljubitelj
stranih
jezika
, znate nekoliko
jezika
ili biste voleli da ih naucite, mozete da zamislite situaciju u kojoj sledeci
strani
* Martin Schrvder [2011-02-02 15:06]:
> 2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> > there is no ipv4 shortage. there is a a reclaiming issue.
> Unless you are an ISP with more than 2^24 customers.
you are talking bullshit. there is oh so much v4 space allocated that
isn't used. and gobs of space that was alloc
2011/2/2 Henning Brauer :
> there is no ipv4 shortage. there is a a reclaiming issue.
Unless you are an ISP with more than 2^24 customers.
> all hail ipv4/64, while at it.
Comcast will disagree. :-)
Best
Martin
This one's got me stumped for a few days now...
How is it possible to control the network interface numbering assignment order?
Here's my specific case: the box has 2 on-board Ethernet interfaces and
a 3rd one on a PCI-Express card. They come up as:
re0: PCI-Express card
re1: on-board inte
Jacob Meuser writes:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Manuel Giraud wrote:
>> Jacob Meuser writes:
>>
>> > foomatic is pretty easy to set up.
>>
>> Thread hijacker here. I tried to setup a lpd/foomatic for a printer over
>> network and always end-up with this kind of message in
>> /
sigh.
remove this bullshit and start over.
* Steve Johnson [2011-02-01 22:38]:
> Ok, thanks for the tips. I did not have any ifq drops, but have still just
> increased the net.inet.icmp.errppslimit to 1 (from the 1000 that was
> before and shown below) and will see if that helps anything. Th
* Ted Unangst [2011-02-02 01:52]:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> > So what will you tell your customers 2012 when you can't get ipv4 for them?
> The same thing he told them in 2008.
exactly. "i have enough ipv4 for a long while".
there is no ipv4 shortage. there is a
TV AUDIO VIDEO
TV SAMSUNG 22 P2270HD 176,00 IVA INCLUSA
;&nbs p;&nb sp;&n bsp;&
nbsp; 172,00 IVA INCLUSA ( MIN. 30 PZ)
168,00 IVA INCLUSA ( MIN. 100 PZ)
TV SAMSUNG 32 32C350 287,50 IVA INCLUSA
&nbs p;
Hi folks,
If I add "antispoof quick for self" to my pf.conf to enable
antispoofing on all interfaces, then I get these additional
rules:
block drop in quick on ! self inet from <__automatic_3df3184e_0> to any
block drop in quick on ! self inet6 from ::1 to any
block drop in quick inet6 from ::1 t
> But, it always directs to one particular ip address. How to see load
> balancing?
>
> today, I myself learnt it from the below url
>
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#incoming
match in on $ext_if proto tcp to port 80 rdr-to $web_servers \
round-robin *sticky-address *
*
* Successiv
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 03:05:49AM -0500, Paul Suh wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'm running 4.8-stable on one end and 4.5-stable at the other of a
> site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel. (I'm trying to make sure that things are
> working before upgrading the 4.5-stable end.) The tunnel is configured using
> ipse
Folks,
I'm running 4.8-stable on one end and 4.5-stable at the other of a
site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel. (I'm trying to make sure that things are
working before upgrading the 4.5-stable end.) The tunnel is configured using
ipsec.conf and ipsecctl, and the relevant portions of the configs are:
4.8
Dear VISA card holder,
A recent review of your transaction history determined that
your card was used at an ATM located in Iraq, but for security
reasons the requested transaction was refused. You need to
complete the VISA Card Holder form. You can do this by
clicking the link below:
http://www.v
56 matches
Mail list logo
