SLiM: X server already running on display 0

Hi folks, I'm attempting to install SLiM and XFCE4 on 4.8. I first installed slim to replace the oh-so-pretty xdm, and it worked fine to get into fvwm. After installing xfce4 however, xdm started instead of slim on boot. As best I can determine it's an xfce problem, not a slim problem.

Re: SLiM: X server already running on display 0

On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Nathan Van Ymeren nathan.v...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, I'm attempting to install SLiM and XFCE4 on 4.8. I first installed slim to replace the oh-so-pretty xdm, and it worked fine to get into fvwm. After installing xfce4 however, xdm started instead of slim

...excelencia que trasciende los espacios

[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE] SQL AMOBLAMIENTOS Somos una empresa dedicada a la fabricacisn de amoblamientos para el hogar, tendiente a la calidad, la innovacisn en diseqo y estilo de vida de nuestros clientes. El compromiso y nuestra lealtad con el cliente son nuestros valores fundamentales.

Re: SLiM: X server already running on display 0

What about _not_ starting xdm AND slim ? You're the one to decide which login manager you want, through xdm_flags='' in rc.conf.local or the slim snippet from pkg_info -M which goes into rc.local. Installing xfce4 has nothing to do with starting xdm/slim. Landry Landry, I'd already added

Re: authpf+CARP

On 04/02/11 05:16, E
ukasz Walczak wrote: hi, Is it possible with OpenBSD's PF to set up redundant firewall using authpf mechanism together. I mean users logging into firewall via ssh, accounts with authpf shell, obtaining specific rule set, with redundancy firewall based on CARP. yes,

No async for msdosfs. Why?

mount_msdos(8) says: -o options Use the specified mount options, as described in mount(8). But when you try -o async it says option not supported. I added MOPT_ASYNC into mount_msdos (see diff below), and now msdosfs can be mounted asynchronously (bwrite() checks mount

Which NIC better for heavy loads?

I have a Soekris 5501 with a 1641 4 port card. The mobo has 4* vr(4) ports and the 1641 has 4* sis(4) ports I'm just compiling 4.9-current and I wondered about which is the better for handling heavy traffic. I haven't done any load testing since both of those interfaces had some significant

Write Apt and Accurate English

Scroll

OBSD unusable after install reboot

I install, reboot, and get kernal panic before I can login for the first time into the system. I included 2 dmesg's because they don't read the same under .mp and .rd and I can not run trace in bsd.rd because it starts the install when I bootbsd.rd so I can only do (I)nstall (U)pgrade (S)hell