At 2011-04-11 15:36:37, Jan Stary wrote:
>On Apr 11 23:35:05, richo wrote:
>> I installed 4.9-current last night on my G5 iMac 8,1
>>
>> Years ago I had 4.4 running on it, and it was a simple case of a kernel
>> rebuild with an extra module included to get the fans working (And
> governed)
>> such
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:53:29PM -0700, Matt S wrote:
> Thank you for all of the help. I am effectively giving up on doing it this
> way. OpenVPN seems to have facilities to make it easier to achieve what I
> want
> to do. I appreciate all of the time and effort spent.
>
>
There should b
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este newsletter haga click AQUI
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
*Los precio estan expresados en dslares estadounidades e incluyen IVA.**Las
configuraciones son a modo
Heya
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Matt S wrote:
>
> You might consider a creative solution with Dead Peer Detection. Per
> ipsec.conf(4), you enable Dead Peer Detection by using an ike dynamic
> statement.
>
>
>
One thing that came to mind for manual config
Try to do ifconfig ix1 up (up in /etc/hostname.ix1)
I've seen vlans not coming up until I do this on parent interface,
although they appear active in ifconfig.
Giannis
On 14/04/11 02:43, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
hello eveyone,
problem is that when i enable vlan on ix interface i can't ping ot
Hi,
I'm trying to use mg as my mail editor. However, I need some 8-bit
characters for portuguese.
In the man page, I saw I need to disable meta-key-mode. I did, but after
each 8-bit character, I get an extra space. Is this an expected
behavior?
Thank you.
hello eveyone,
problem is that when i enable vlan on ix interface i can't ping other
side. servers are identical and cross connected with twinax SFP+ cable.
tried thru switches with other ix interface but same result.
card is dual 10GbE intel SFP+ SR, but i'm not sure is it X520-D2 or
X520-SR2
Thank you for all of the help. I am effectively giving up on doing it this
way. OpenVPN seems to have facilities to make it easier to achieve what I want
to do. I appreciate all of the time and effort spent.
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 07:34 -0700, Matt S wrote:
> Hi Claudiu:
>
>
> Thank you for
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 07:34 -0700, Matt S wrote:
> Hi Claudiu:
>
>
> Thank you for your reply. I did try your suggestion to do a route add
> A.B.C.D.E and unfortunately it did not work so well. I
> lost connectivity to the branch altogether over the VPN. At least I
> have console access :) O
Hello,
I don't know if this will help you, but
"When passive is specified, isakmpd(8) will not
immediately start negotiation of this tunnel, but wait for an
incoming request from the remote peer."
You can write a program that initialize connection, transmit your data and
fi
You might consider a creative solution with Dead Peer Detection. Per
ipsec.conf(4), you enable Dead Peer Detection by using an ike dynamic statement.
Heya
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 04/13/11 09:38, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Edho P Arief wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> It looks cool to provide devs-like answer to users, but there is a big
>> difference - they know what they are talking about ;-)
>>
>
> sorry, I was bored tonight and figured that since
Heya
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 04/13/11 09:38, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
>> "Scott" == Scott McEachern writes:
>>>
>> Scott> It's called "port knocking". Google is your friend here.
>>
>> And if you recommend or use port knocking, you're an amateur
> "Scott" == Scott McEachern writes:
Scott> It's called "port knocking". Google is your friend here.
And if you recommend or use port knocking, you're an amateur at crypto.
If adding 8 sniffable bits to your effective key length makes you
significantly more secure, you've lost the game alre
d= e%=o<
h/7g9e;d;%d8 gh? g;f %g!.h.$d= h."ieTradeChannel.netgh5h./c
g!.h.$h."i
h %d;%d8
h? g;f fo< h/7e$
e6e
h44d8
d;%d8 h? g;e0f5h'e(o<
http://subscriber.ReasonableSpread.com/ConfirmOptIn.aspx?a=5351&b=33A313D
d8:d? i id8 d8
d<f6e0d8
e?h&gh5h./o< g!.h.$e.
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:07:09 -0600 Mark Leonard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently purchased a 16-port PCI-e serial card with Oxford UARTs.
> OpenBSD 4.8 detects the Oxford chips, but doesn't seem to be able to
> use the 'unknown product 0xc308'. This thread
> http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd
Christiano:
Thanks for your help. So, if I am understanding correctly, I need to create
the
following routes on the branch office router (OpenBSD):
route change -net 0.0.0.0/0 172.16.254.2 #I tried using 10.40.60.1 as the
gateway and I got a network unreachable error
route add -host 172.16.2
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
> It looks cool to provide devs-like answer to users, but there is a big
> difference - they know what they are talking about ;-)
>
sorry, I was bored tonight and figured that since he asked in "ports
or packages", I tried to give him pointer w
Hello,
I've tried to use monit on my OpenBSD snapshot
Which is:
# uname -ap
OpenBSD openbsd.eject.name 4.9 GENERIC.MP#814 i386 Intel(R) Atom(TM)
CPU D425 @ 1.80GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)
# pkg_info -v monit
Information for inst:monit-4.10.1p1
I tried to run it with "out of package config"
On 12 April 2011 23:53, Matt S wrote:
> Hello @misc:
>
> I am up against a stumper. I have a Site-to-Site IPSEC VPN working
beautifully.
> However, I would like the remote site to route all of its traffic through
the
> VPN. After googling, I seemed to come up with a suggestion to do a route
cha
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Edho P Arief wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, pavel pocheptsov
> wrote:
>> does openbsd have l2tpd-daemon in packages or ports?
>>
>>
>
> http://openports.se
Before start of pointing to some service it's useful to test if
there's something related to l2
On 2011-04-08, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:25:55PM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
>> I am trying to test squid 3.2.0.6 on OpenBSD 4.8 (amd64) in
>> transparent mode. I can browse internet. But, I get the below error.
>>
>
>> # chgrp _squid /dev/pf
>> # chmod g+rw /dev/pf
>
On 13 April 2011 14:11, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
> does openbsd have l2tpd-daemon in packages or ports?
>
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=l2tpd+openbsd
On 04/13/11 09:38, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Scott" == Scott McEachern writes:
Scott> It's called "port knocking". Google is your friend here.
And if you recommend or use port knocking, you're an amateur at crypto.
If adding 8 sniffable bits to your effective key length makes you
significan
Hi Claudiu:
Thank you for your reply. I did try your suggestion to do a route add
A.B.C.D.E
and unfortunately it did not work so well. I lost connectivity
to
the branch altogether over the VPN. At least I have console access :) Once I
removed the route, I regained connectivity over the v
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:11 PM, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
> does openbsd have l2tpd-daemon in packages or ports?
>
>
http://openports.se
On 2011-04-13, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 04/13/11 05:19, nemir nemirius wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> One of my clients is a major bank. We need to exchange data a few
>> times a day at different intervals, and they're insisting that we
>> initiate the VPN on demand with relevent traffic.
>>
>> It work
On 2011-04-13, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
> does openbsd have l2tpd-daemon in packages or ports?
see /usr/src/usr.sbin/npppd, it is NOT built by default yet.
it would probably be helpful to run -current (or at least refer to
HOWTO_PIPEX_NPPPD.txt from -current, the one in 4.8 is out of date
with re
Dear Sir / Madam
I have this agent that has booked a very interesting tailor-made b 10 Day
Wildest Africab tour. He already has 4 people on the tour and still
marketing to his other clients, as per the below dates, the closing date is 15
June 2011. I am looking to try and get a full group and hav
Hello all,
just curious on a strange behaviour of an active/active firewall
configuration:
when I do a "tcpdump -nei pfsync0" to watch what sort of state
updates are passed and do a "tail -f /var/log/messages" I see that in
the moment the command is issued the VHID CARP interfaces on t
does openbsd have l2tpd-daemon in packages or ports?
Hi,
This link may help:
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/OpenBsdPf
Thanks,
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:51 +0700, Muhammad Muntaza
wrote:
2011/4/8, Indunil Jayasooriya :
Hi list,
I am trying to test squid 3.2.0.6 on OpenBSD 4.8 (amd64) in
transparent mode. I can browse i
No puede ver la imagen correctamente? Si quiere ver una versiC3n online de
este anuncio haga clic en el siguiente link:
http://enviomasivodemails.net/mail/display.php?M=176106&C=3b8f013c96f99e5cd04
5b4d41ddadf85&S=4&L=1&N=1
Abril - 2011
Mantener SuscripciC3n Eliminar SuscripciC3n
Le ofrecemos
B
Docteur Doublier-Villette
Chemin du Relais St RochB B B B B B
26400
Vaunaveys-la-RochetteB B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B
04 75 25 11 88
ville...@lunivers.info ( "mailto:ville...@lunivers.info"; )
B
B
B
Lettre du
2011/4/8, Indunil Jayasooriya :
> Hi list,
>
> I am trying to test squid 3.2.0.6 on OpenBSD 4.8 (amd64) in
> transparent mode. I can browse internet. But, I get the below error.
>
>
>
> 2011/04/08 17:43:11 kid1| Intercept.cc(305) PfInterception: PF open
> failed: (13) Permission denied
> 2011/04/08
Hi list,
I am trying to configure different interval and timeout values in
relayd.conf.
But relayd ignores the table interval and timeout options.
Here is my relayd.conf
host1="10.0.0.1"
host2="10.0.0.2"
host_ext="192.168.0.1"
interval 5
timeout 3000
table { $host1 $host2 }
relay smtp_relay {
On 04/13/11 05:19, nemir nemirius wrote:
Hi,
One of my clients is a major bank. We need to exchange data a few
times a day at different intervals, and they're insisting that we
initiate the VPN on demand with relevent traffic.
It works from their end. Tunnel is down, they send a ping, firs
Hi,
One of my clients is a major bank. We need to exchange data a few
times a day at different intervals, and they're insisting that we
initiate the VPN on demand with relevent traffic.
It works from their end. Tunnel is down, they send a ping, first
packet is dropped as the tunnel is brough
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 09:24:30AM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have:
>>
>> $ ./wfica -version
>> Citrix Receiver for Linux
>> Version 11.100.158406
>> Copyright 1998-2010 Citrix Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> Copyright
[IMAGE]
Se non sei ancora iscritto alla Newsletter di NanniMagazine clicca QUI
< /TR>
Facebook: Facebook Diventa Fan RSS: d Sottoscrivi gli RSS
Newsletter Nr. 17 Aprile 2011
Le altre rubriche:
Costume
Tech life
Donne
Famiglia
[IMAGE]
NanniMagazine h un periodico di informazione gior
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 19:53 -0700, Matt S wrote:
> Hello @misc:
>
> I am up against a stumper. I have a Site-to-Site IPSEC VPN working
> beautifully.
> However, I would like the remote site to route all of its traffic through
> the
> VPN. After googling, I seemed to come up with a suggestio
41 matches
Mail list logo
