On Apr 17 22:07:13, Rodrigo Mosconi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested on some benchmarks, specially with network/PF.
For example:
What's the maximum bandwidth that a soekris (or alix) can handle safely as a
firewall? (with and without ipsec, how long the rule set are)
Peter Hallin
Lanzamiento de la Estrategia Google... da click aqum
La Estrategia Google la forma mas sencilla y efectiva de aumentar tus
ventas usando Internet.
Hola
Recientemente iniciamos nuestra Estrategia Google.
Da click en la liga para ver la Lanzamiento, aprovecha estar oportunidad
para promoverte en
OCCIDENTAL HOTELES
SI NO PUEDE VISUALIZAR DE CLICK AQUI
OCCIDENTAL GRAND XCARET - LA JOYA DE LA RIVERA MAYA- ESPECTACULARES
PAQUETES DE LUJO DESDE - 2,999 - www.occidentalvcescapes.com
CODIGO DE PROMOCION PSERRANO
Hi list. I'm making a program that maps some ip address to a specified
dns. My problem is relative to CNAME record.
Supposing we have google ip, generated from a program, and we don't know
that this ip is pointing to www.google.it. This program try to get
hostname and give that the specified ip
This diff fixed the problem. Thanks!
Maybe this is a silly question but this diff its applied on the latest
snapshot iso?
I have IPSec with manual flow between two 4.8 box, and all is work great.
I can't in one moment setup two 4.9, and I want to ask: can I change one
side of IPSec
on 4.9?
2011/4/18 Richard Toohey richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz:
On 18/04/2011, at 1:07 PM, Rodrigo Mosconi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested on some benchmarks, specially with network/PF.
On the general performance:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/perf.html
For example:
What's the maximum
On 15.4.2011 12:49, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:37:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
01:20:38.556705 802.1Q vid 0 pri 0 802.1Q vid 123 pri 0 arp who-has
10.3.3.2 tell 10.3.3.1
your config is OK, something is broken there. I guess this will make
it function but it's not a
Hello list,
is it possible to make outgoing traffic load-balance in a way that
connections from the same internal IP to the same external IP always use
the same WAN-connection (at least until the
The example under
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/pools.html#outexample
circumvents it by
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:57:20AM -0600, Orestes LeaL R. wrote:
This diff fixed the problem. Thanks!
Maybe this is a silly question but this diff its applied on the
latest snapshot iso?
Any committed code will be present in any snapshot dated after the
commit. Allowing for any timezone
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:10:31PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi list. I'm making a program that maps some ip address to a specified
dns. My problem is relative to CNAME record.
:
Supposing that I have 209.85.148.104 ip, is possible (only knowing the
ip) go back to the CNAME record
Try this, let me know what happens.
Index: linux_exec.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_exec.c,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -p -r1.33 linux_exec.c
--- linux_exec.c5 Apr 2011 15:44:40 - 1.33
+++
Hi,
can do that tomorrow.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Paul Irofti p...@irofti.net wrote:
Try this, let me know what happens.
Index: linux_exec.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_exec.c,v
retrieving revision
Due to an circumstances beyond my control, I'm not longer able to host
/ maintain /work with OpenBSD-Wiki.org. I was in the process of
updating it when some personal issues came up.
I'm interested in passing this off to someone else who may be
interested. I'll help migrate it, get things back up
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 04:26:12PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:10:31PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi list. I'm making a program that maps some ip address to a specified
dns. My problem is relative to CNAME record.
:
Supposing that I have 209.85.148.104 ip,
Aviso a #t odoslosmexicanos
Este sitio fue creado para que todos los mexicanos se expresen sobre la
situaciC3n que vivimos respecto de las telecomunicaciones en MC)xico.
Expresiones en video o escritas. Este sitio se conecta al canal de Yo
utube todoslosmexicanos.org, a los comentarios de ustedes
A presente e-newsletter destina-se znica e exclusivamente a informar e nco
pode ser considerada SPAM. De acordo com a legislagco internacional que
regulamenta o correio electrsnico, o e-mail nco podera ser considerado SPAM
quando incluir uma forma do receptor ser removido da lista. Caso o seu nome
Hi all,
A number of you may have noticed the recent flurry of activity,
leading to stuff
like bigmem being turned on.. Some more good stuff is coming soon (my amd64
at my house is using 7 gigabyes of memory for buffer cache, and I'm doing builds
without touching disks..). Some really
I've done the following and at first I didn't mail in case it was a
weird vmware bug but it does exactly the same thing on real hardware.
Someone mentioned fairly recently in 'equivalent of Linux mount -o
bind' which should interest a recent poster a little, that you could
use /dev/wd* directly
Oops forgot, it occured on vmware and a physical box but was 4.8 stable
on both. Shall I grab a snapshot, as I say I've worked it a different
way and maybe this was the wrong way of using vnconfig anyway.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:39:19 -0600, Bob Beck b...@obtuse.com wrote:
Hi all,
So, short answer? go buy a CD. pre-orders are a little slow this
release, and we need
to see some more activity in that area.
Then maybe I'll stop worrying about it and commit that thing that
will make your
amd64
Date was wrong resent for those that sort by date and not receipt order,
sorry for duplicates.
I've done the following and at first I didn't mail in case it was a
weird vmware bug but it does exactly the same thing on real hardware.
Someone mentioned fairly recently in 'equivalent of Linux mount
Rodrigo Mosconi [open...@mosconi.mat.br] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm interested on some benchmarks, specially with network/PF.
How about this...With GENERIC -current amd64 kernel, I'm getting almost 800Mbps
on a single FTP transfer between two 1Gbit-connected boxes with em controllers
and mfi RAID
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Bob Beck wrote:
Hi all,
A number of you may have noticed the recent flurry of activity,
leading to stuff like bigmem being turned on.. Some more good stuff is
coming soon (my amd64 at my house is using 7 gigabyes of memory for
buffer cache, and I'm doing builds
Hi,
the FAQ says:
When serious bugs or security flaws are discovered in third party software,
they are fixed in the *-stable* branch of the ports tree. Remember that the
lifecycle is 1 release: only the current and last release are updated
Does it mean:
1) 4.8-stable and -current have security
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:45:10 +0200
enclair wifiencl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
the FAQ says:
When serious bugs or security flaws are discovered in third party
software, they are fixed in the *-stable* branch of the ports tree.
Remember that the lifecycle is 1 release: only the current and
Chris, don't forget to mention that they are simplifying the buffer cache (and
bigmem!) so that when the attempted switch to rthreads comes, there will be far
less hassles
compared to FreeBSD or NetBSD, which literally took 2-5 years to perfect. Read
Matt Dillon's interview linked from
Amit Kulkarni [amitk...@gmail.com] wrote:
Chris, don't forget to mention that they are simplifying the buffer cache
(and bigmem!) so that when the attempted switch to rthreads comes, there will
be far less hassles
compared to FreeBSD or NetBSD, which literally took 2-5 years to perfect.
Sunblade1000 for a desktop. I run OpenBSD on it at times. Mach64 card
1024x768. if you have a better card then the graphics should be better.
You can do a lot more with it than just run emacs.
--- On Fri, 4/15/11, Christiano F. Haesbaert haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
From: Christiano F.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:56:45AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I've done the following and at first I didn't mail in case it was a
weird vmware bug but it does exactly the same thing on real hardware.
Someone mentioned fairly recently in 'equivalent of Linux mount -o
bind' which should
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:22, Alexander Schrijver
alexander.schrij...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a great way to keep someone out of their own system.
Huh? Wouldn't securely backing up the RSA keys prevent this? If you
are mindful enough to use keys in the first place and don't back up
such critical
A number of you may have noticed the recent flurry of activity,
leading to stuff like bigmem being turned on.. Some more good stuff is
coming soon (my amd64 at my house is using 7 gigabyes of memory for
buffer cache, and I'm doing builds without touching disks..). Some
really cool stuff
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:56:45AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I've done the following and at first I didn't mail in case it was a
weird vmware bug but it does exactly the same thing on real hardware.
Someone mentioned fairly recently in 'equivalent of Linux mount -o
bind' which
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Theo de Raadt wrote:
A number of you may have noticed the recent flurry of activity,
leading to stuff like bigmem being turned on.. Some more good stuff is
coming soon (my amd64 at my house is using 7 gigabyes of memory for
buffer cache, and I'm doing builds without
34 matches
Mail list logo
