On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dorian B|ttner dorian.buett...@gmx.de
wrote:
Actually gotten fingers on a somewhat powerful machine and I thought why
not
test a snapshot on it.
Leading is bsd with ps and trace, followed by bsd.sp which boots ok.
Hope this is not a maloperation?
Looks like
On 2011-07-27, Christopher Zimmermann madro...@zakweb.de wrote:
Ok, solved this one. bge0 was in group local, which is matched by
set skip on lo
is this the desired behavior? It can catch you by surprise easily!
It's not desired behaviour, I think this should fix it but have
no time to test
On 2011-07-27, hvom .org hvom@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I very problem with packet-filter OpenBSD 4.9 !
I read in /etc/pf.conf :
scrub in all syntax error
scrub in syntax error
match in all scrub syntax error
scrub in all on $re0 syntax error
I become crazy, help
Good morning! This is Ivan from China. Recently, we launched some new LED
bulbs, so I'm in a hurry to share with you.The lumen is up to 90lm/w,
CRIgt;80Ra. If any designs apeal to you, don't forget to give me a feed
back!Meanwhile, I also work in this field over years, so I'm quite
familiar with
Web: http://www.smtgreen.com
Good morning! This is Ivan from China. Recently, we launched some new LED
bulbs, so I'm in a hurry to share with you.The lumen is up to 90lm/w,
CRIgt;80Ra. If any designs apeal to you, don't forget to give me a feed
back!Meanwhile, I also work in this field over
Am 22.07.2011 um 00:13 schrieb Mikeal Clark:
163350.058716 Default ike_phase_1_recv_ID: received remote ID other than
expected 1.2.3.4
I think, you need
srcid 1.2.3.4 dstid 5.6.7.8
on site A ike.
Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6 b +49 151 2300 9283 b computing @ chaos claudius
Hi all,
B
I have a machine with 4.8 OpenBSD, which I want to use as a gateway.
But I can not get any traffic on the 2nd nic.
Forwarding for inet and inet6 is set =1
It is not a problem of the nics. If I install nic2 first then it works and
nic1
doesn't work.
It is also not a problem of PF, which
On 07/27/11 16:42, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
I found out the datasheet for 0x4383
http://developer.amd.com/assets/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf
I've no knowledge of PCI to debug it though.
Try something like this in rc.local and see if it works.
# Setting Mother Board Audio Device as
Hi all,
I have a routing firewall, which is also a ipsec client like this:
ppp uplink (IPv4)
|
dc3|pppoe0
+++
|+|dc1
| enc0
Well, it would be nice to have some more info like dmesg, hostname.? and
other info to help you solve the problem.
// rancor
Den 28 jul 2011 12:51 skrev wp10596728-4 khaeberl...@cmq-kh.de:
Hi all,
B
I have a machine with 4.8 OpenBSD, which I want to use as a gateway.
But I can not get any
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:23:02 +0200
Axel Rau axel@chaos1.de wrote:
Hi all,
I have a routing firewall, which is also a ipsec client like this:
ppp uplink (IPv4)
|
dc3|pppoe0
+++
Am 28.07.2011 um 16:06 schrieb Gregory Edigarov:
let me guess
I think you just need to allow traffic on enc0
set skip on enc0
No, its not that easy. (-;
I block carp multicast messages on enc0 and just showed that.
A tcpdump on enc0 would have shown the same.
The problem is that those
On 28 July 2011 07:50, Greg Jones gjones5...@netscape.net wrote:
On 07/27/11 16:42, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
I found out the datasheet for 0x4383
http://developer.amd.com/assets/43009_sb7xx_rrg_pub_1.00.pdf
I've no knowledge of PCI to debug it though.
Try something like this in
Am 28.07.2011 08:01, schrieb Matthew Dempsky:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dorian B|ttnerdorian.buett...@gmx.de wrote:
Actually gotten fingers on a somewhat powerful machine and I thought why not
test a snapshot on it.
Leading is bsd with ps and trace, followed by bsd.sp which boots ok.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
this works fine:
match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
tcpdump while pinging:
92.203.101.134 74.125.39.147: icmp: echo request
74.125.39.147
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
this works fine:
match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
tcpdump while pinging:
Hello misc.
I would like to know if is possible do the following:
clients--OpenBSD_FWExternal_mail_server
when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and send a
copy of this to another email account, it must be transparently to user.
Please,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:00 PM, R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
Hello misc.
I would like to know if is possible do the following:
clients--OpenBSD_FWExternal_mail_server
when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and send a
copy of
Whatever this is (and I don't have the slightest clue what that
might be), I noticed it on a 4.9 box the other day, upgraded to
-current, still see it there.
$ sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 5.0-beta (GENERIC) #22: Tue Jul 26 06:24:05 MDT 2011
Mayorista de Remeras Gorras y Chombas publicitarias para su empresa u
organizacion
Maxima Calidad con el mejor precio del mercado. Contamos con gran stock
disponible. Atendemos pedidos urgentes
Nuestros productos no pierden color con los lavados, no se estiran ni se
despega el estampado - No se
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:00:03 -0300
R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
when clients send or receive an email, OpenBSD catch this mail and
send a copy of this to another email account, it must be
transparently to user.
bad juju!
sooo, you want to intercept email not destined for yourself.
Hello Robert,
I appreciated your email:
I would like explain:
Yes is corporate organization, all employees are aware that a copy of sended
and received email.
All employees sign a document which they are aware. Here, in Brazil, since
that exists a document, signed, it is valid, of course.
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:39:20 -0300
R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com wrote:
Yes is corporate organization, all employees are aware that a copy of
sended and received email.
All employees sign a document which they are aware. Here, in Brazil,
since that exists a document, signed, it is valid, of
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 08:51:41PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
Hi,
pppoe0 has 92.203.101.134.
this works fine:
match out log on egress inet from 192.168.23.0/24 nat-to pppoe0
tcpdump while pinging:
Again, thank you
I know that an user very determined can do some things, but he don't know
what I can do with PF
People should be educated like you :)
Best regards and Thank you !
2011/7/28 roberth rob...@openbsd.pap.st
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 19:39:20 -0300
R0me0 *** knight@gmail.com
25 matches
Mail list logo
