On 8/30/11 6:15 PM, Marcos Ariel Laufer wrote:
I didn't mean evangelizing, but you never know who might be a future
donator, after all OpenBSD needs donations
Donor, not donator.
Mehma
Hello
I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
Aug 29 10:11:03.520900 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
190.87.195.241.2732 192.168.5.2.21: S 2008995709:2008995709(0) win
65535 mss 1452,nop,nop,sackOK
Aug 29 10:15:52.825409 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
190.87.195.241.3190
2011/8/31 fqui nonez fquinon...@gmail.com:
Hello
I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
Aug 29 10:11:03.520900 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
190.87.195.241.2732 192.168.5.2.21: S 2008995709:2008995709(0) win
65535 mss 1452,nop,nop,sackOK
Aug 29 10:15:52.825409 rule
flags destination gateway lpref med aspath origin
AI*
10.0.1.0/24 172.29.1.200 100 0 i
current1#
What is
incorrect on this ?
Hi all,
Is not so hard at it seems: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html
Why is Apache included? It isn't needed by many people!
Because the developers want it.
Why isn't a newer version of Apache included?
The license on newer versions is unacceptable.
If you need/want another httpd, go to
Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org a C)crit :
Hi,
current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
AS 65001
network 10.0.1.0/24
current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
flags: * = Valid, = Selected, I = via IBGP, A = Announced
origin: i = IGP, e = EGP, ? = Incomplete
On 31/08/2011, at 7:16 PM, matteo filippetto wrote:
2011/8/31 fqui nonez fquinon...@gmail.com:
Hello
I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
Aug 29 10:11:03.520900 rule 3/(match) pass in on rl0:
190.87.195.241.2732 192.168.5.2.21: S 2008995709:2008995709(0) win
65535 mss
Hi,
You will find your solution here : http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/ftp.html
Best regards,
Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY
http://mouedine.net/ruleset49.aspx
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:38:41 -0700, fqui nonez fquinon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
I have a ftpd server box, OBSD-4.9, and pflog shows:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Patrick Lamaiziere
patf...@davenulle.orgwrote:
Le Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:19:15 +0200,
Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org a icrit :
Hi,
current1# cat /etc/bgpd.conf
AS 65001
network 10.0.1.0/24
current1# bgpctl show rib nei 172.29.1.52 out
flags: * =
Hi
Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the config...
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Andre Keller a...@list.ak.cx wrote:
Hi
Am 31.08.2011 10:23, schrieb Tony Sarendal:
Sender says next hop = 172.29.1.100, receiver says .51.
show rib out in this case shows incorrect nexthop.
Well thats kind of the point of having set nexthop self in the
Henrique Antsnio Evaristo skrev 2011-08-30 09:08:
Humm, nice ... I was interested in knowing the power consumption of that setup.
Do you have any possibility to provide that ?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Henrique
We're using 1U chassis:
http://mini-itx.com/store/?c=33#p3809
Around 45-50W under
Cannot configure internet with static IP address
hostname.fc0
inet IP mask
and nothing works. They gave me login and password, may be this is the
case?
--
igor denisov.
Hi
What is the best way to build a vpn between an OpenBSD 4.9 gateway
and a Win7 workstation ?
Thank you very much for your advices.
All the
best,
Wesley M.
Lot of thanks to all who tried to help denisovigor1...@rambler.ru. I
should read the FAQ first, problem is solved.
Si no puede ver este anuncio, haga click aqum
Especialmzate e insirtate en el mercado laboral con un click
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Cursos en Mixico
Para mayor informacisn, llene sus datos
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Wesley M. open...@e-solutions.re wrote:
What is the best way to build a vpn between an OpenBSD 4.9 gateway
and a Win7 workstation ?
I got this working here on our network, both for Win7 and Ubuntu
clients going to an OpenBSD gateway.
On the gateway, have
Ok, thank you a lot for your replay.
Have you ever try to use ikev2 ? using iked and so win7 have ikev2
support.
I tried to use it (iked) but no success... :(
If you can take a eye on it.
Cheers,
Wesley M.
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:07:49 +0800, Zak Elep
zak.e...@orangeandbronze.com wrote:
On Wed,
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes = 256 files = 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way making the surfing experience better too. BTW you can't
update things willy nilly, you have to do pretty much all of it at once.
On Tue, Aug
First, check the syntax refering to hostname.if(5) openbsd manual guide
Did you configure it during installation process or after installation process
was done?
What do you mean by giving you login and password?
Which user did you use to configure IP address? Did you login as root or as
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes = 256 files = 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way making the surfing experience better too. BTW you can't
update
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes = 256 files = 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way making the surfing experience
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes = 256 files = 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way making the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:23 PM, lancebaynes87 lancebayne...@zoho.com
wrote:
Are there any solutions?
B I can't SSH to it anymore, because it asks for password.
B Does anybody knows a solution for this
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 19:51, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
why would i _not_ use another free alternative with a spotless security
record, that has small, isolated processes communicating with each other
in chroot, outputting very nice logs, having human readable
configuration with
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:11:52AM -0400, swilly wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 19:51, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
why would i _not_ use another free alternative with a spotless security
record, that has small, isolated processes communicating with each other
in chroot,
Why are you using set nexthop self and then trying to change that
with the filter allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200.
If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
that.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Tony Sarendal t...@polarcap.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31,
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:23:18PM +0200, Gilles Chehade said that
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/11/10/4051954
a mail you will probably never forgive me :]
good luck with the project :]
-f
--
i know someone with the exact same name! really? who?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:32:14PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:23:18PM +0200, Gilles Chehade said that
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/11/10/4051954
a mail you will probably never forgive me :]
Not at all, I just recalled that rant
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Josh Hoppes josh.hop...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you using set nexthop self and then trying to change that
with the filter allow quick to 172.29.1.52 set nexthop 172.29.1.200.
If you don't want your nexthop to be yourself don't tell bgpd to do
that.
To show
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Henrique Antsnio Evaristo wrote:
Humm, nice ... I was interested in knowing the power consumption of that
setup.
Do you have any possibility to provide that ?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Henrique
Henrique,
I will be in a position to post on power consumption of my
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
Are you putting two boards in one case for redundancy / high
availability ? So that, when one fails the other can ... be taken
down too to fix the first one ?
Paul,
As far as I can tell. The two sides are fully independent of each other. As
On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:03 AM, Johan Linner wrote:
We're running OpenBSD 4.9 on:
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=47#jnc92-330
with Jetway 3x Gigabit LAN Motherboard Modules:
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=34#modules
Works great.
Johan,
Thanks for the info!
--Paul
[demime 1.01d
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2011-08-29, Paul Suh pl...@goodeast.com wrote:
I'm looking for a mini-ITX motherboard with at least 4 x Gig-E ports. I
would
like to fit two of them into a 1U, dual mini-ITX case to have a
CARP/SASYNC
pair with connections to external,
2011/8/31 Paul Suh pl...@goodeast.com:
a data center with multiple machines behind the routers I really want
something that can support ~500 Gbps so that we can use the full speed that we
500 _G_bps? Please tell us when you've found something that can handle that. :-)
Best
Martin
On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:34 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2011/8/30 Paul Suh pl...@goodeast.com:
I'm looking for a mini-ITX motherboard with at least 4 x Gig-E ports. I
would
Not a board, but full computers:
http://www.lannerinc.com/Embedded_Computing/All-Purpose_Box_Computers/LEC-212
6
Is the server far away from you? The only way to properly fixx this issue is to
boot in single mode!
--Original Message--
From: Marcos Ariel Laufer
Sender: owner-m...@openbsd.org
To: Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
Cc: Lars Hansson
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What should I do
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan said that
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but webkit likes = 256 files = 16384 stack. Adsuck can
go a long way
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:32:20PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:32:23AM -0500, Bryan said that
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:23, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
That sounds more like crappy DNS or filtered Internet. I can't speak
for chromium but
hmm, on Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:43:28AM -0500, Marco Peereboom said that
My Internet is ATT U-verse, so you may be right about the crappy DNS. I
will try changing it to OpenDNS or Google's DNS and see if that helps...
give pdnsd a try. one realises how slow dns can be without a nice
I was posting to advoc...@openbsd.org, but only SPAM seems to function on
that list?
http://youcanlinux.wordpress.com/my-thoughts-on-openbsd/
31 Aug 2011
I was driving home Sunday and there was a Lamborghini Diablo VT driving
nearby. I caught up to it and it made an unusual soundb. very
Why not ? Sure it's easier to control a group if it's small.
You can also delegate authority to experienced people
for different areas. This is currently done in openbsd.
The BSD community is very small compared to Linux. As an example,
in Mauritius, there are 2 BSD users (Mac OS X doesn't count
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:31:15PM +0200, ropers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
If other BSDs worked this way, they would have been
successful in attracting a larger userbase. They
have the means to do it with their larger developer
community.
On
Hi,
I've looked for a mailing list for OpenBGPD but come up empty. If there's
a better place to report this, please let me know.
I'm using OpenBGPD as a fairly large route collector. In total, about 75
neighbors announcing ~21 million prefixes. This is
openbgpd-4.9.20110612_1 running on
[IMAGE]
WSI, Pms de Mixico Adsmedia presentan:
Congreso Nacional Internet Marketing Evolution
Presentando las tematicas y tendencias mas innovadoras que le permitan
desarrollar una estrategia de MKT Digital apropiada a su necesidad.
Presentacisn Exclusiva: 30 de Septiembre Ciudad de Mixico
I have Areca 1210 and 1220 RAID Controllers in a number of OpenBSD
servers.
The arc man page says arc supports alarm control and monitoring of
volumes configured on the controllers via the bio(4) interface and the
bioctl(8) utility.
However, when I try to silence an alarm, I get the following:
Conozca el nuevo sitio de Achieva hablenos a nuestras oficinas en
Monterrey o visite la zona de contacto y pregunte todas sus dudas
Si no puedes ver las imagenes pulsa (mostrar imagenes)
47 matches
Mail list logo
