2011/10/9 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 09:06:15PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
2011/10/8 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:35:19PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
Hi misc,
Recently I bought COM to PCMCIA adapter, full dmesg at
2011/10/9 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
How can I do that? Can you show me an example of the command I need?
yes, plug the card in and send me the full output of pcidump -v
run as root, without removing any parts of the
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:28:49PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
2011/10/9 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
How can I do that? Can you show me an example of the command I need?
yes, plug the card in and send me the
2011/10/9 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:28:49PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
2011/10/9 Jonathan Gray j...@goblin.cx
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 12:02:03PM +0300, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
How can I do that? Can you show me an example of the command I need?
Hello,
I tried to boot via `bsd -a' and then asked for root device
I wrote DUID of accessible disk but no success.
root device (default sd0a): fba123e4bd29707a.a
use one of: exit em0 iwn0 sd0[a-p] cd0[a-p] sd1[a-p] sd2[a-p]
I still do not understand meaning of this commit, sorry
I don't know C
You can mount with duid in fstab but I can't find a way to change root
device to a duid in the boot manual. You must use a device found in
/dev/
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bootsektion=8arch=i386apropos=0manpath=OpenBSD+Current
// Johan
2011/10/9 Jiri B ji...@wolfman.devio.us:
Everything I read about CARP, including my Book on PF 2nd edition,
says you're supposed to have two different ip-addresses set for each
carp device, for two hosts that is. And one third ip-address in the
same network on the psuedo carp0 interface you create.
Since I'm aiming to load balance on
2011/10/9 Stefan Midjich sweh...@gmail.com:
Everything I read about CARP, including my Book on PF 2nd edition,
says you're supposed to have two different ip-addresses set for each
carp device, for two hosts that is. And one third ip-address in the
same network on the psuedo carp0 interface you
I assume you mean balancing? I wanted to go for balancing ip but
that's only because I read about it in the carp(4) manual, now I think
I'll go with just vhid carpdev and pass set to see if I can get the
load balancing working with just one ip-address on the carp interface,
first and foremost.
2011/10/9 Stefan Midjich sweh...@gmail.com:
I assume you mean balancing? I wanted to go for balancing ip but
that's only because I read about it in the carp(4) manual, now I think
I'll go with just vhid carpdev and pass set to see if I can get the
load balancing working with just one
Hi Stefan,
i'm not doing load balance, just active/passive router/firewall
configuration, but we're using only one ip on carp, with no ip address on
the phisical interfaces. Our configuration is like this:
# cat /etc/hostname.fxp0
up
# cat /etc/hostname.carp0
inet 81.xx.xx.xx 255.255.255.252
It's for a gateway with one external address on the outside interface
and an internal network on the inside, with servers on the internal
network that need to receive load balanced traffic.
So the aim is to have a carp0 on the outside between two systems. One
carp1 on the inside between the same
Fellow OpenBSD users,
I've noticed a disturbing trend: Very few users are testing
patches that developers/contributors are posting.
In OpenBSD, -current is NOT volatile as other projects. So
you can grab a a snapshot and start using it right away.
Ariane posted a huge diff to drastically reduce
2011/10/9 Stefan Midjich sweh...@gmail.com:
It's for a gateway with one external address on the outside interface
and an internal network on the inside, with servers on the internal
network that need to receive load balanced traffic.
So the aim is to have a carp0 on the outside between two
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:59:16 +1000
Rod Whitworth wrote:
Stop trolling.
Not to mention comparing searches for exploit and OpenBSD to exploits
and Cisco or the same for available attack tools.
The only valid reason he could have here is that the hardware is well
tested and you don't have to
Loganaden Velvindron loganaden at gmail.com writes:
If we don't shake things up, things will not change ! Running -current and
testing diffs _helps_ OpenBSD development significantly.
The problem, IMO, how process is organized.
Mailing lists are not designed for commenting and reviewing
Si no puede ver este boletmn, haga clic aqui
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Si has recibido este email es porque te has registrado en Groupmyid.com o
has tenido una relacion comercial con MYID Espaqa. Te recordamos que
segun la
17 matches
Mail list logo
