Traductrice professionnelle Anglais <> Frangais
Bonjour,
Je viens vers vous car dans le cadre de mon activiti: Traduction Anglais -
Frangais - Anglais,
j'aimerais collaborer avec vous et vous proposer mes services.
TRADUCTION
Sites Internet
CV norme
anglophone
Menus,
Plaquettes
com
Proceso de Seleccion de Personal [IMAGE]Proceso de Seleccion de Personal
15 Sslidos y Practicos Consejos para Mejorar su Proceso de Seleccisn de
Personal.
A travis de este completo programa, se le proporcionara ticnicas y
sugerencias actualizadas que incrementaran notablemente su habilidad para
t
Hi,
Did you two even read what problem I described?
Am 27.10.2011 20:44, schrieb David Newman:
On 10/25/11 6:20 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
I had some similar looking problems some releases back. Using a separate
carp if for ipv6 mostly fixed it. Didn't write down the exact problem,
though.
How
Tomas Bodzar [tomas.bod...@gmail.com] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, tx wrote:
> > Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between several 1GBE
> > links) with standard x86 CPU such as Xeon or Opteron and "accelerated" NICs
> > like Intel PRO1000/PT? All with latest stable
I haven't looked for years, but in the dim dark past many NIC drivers
made non-optimal hardware accesses which slowed them down quite a bit.
Profiling helped find some of them. Exactly how many cycles of stall
happen during a bus (PCI, PCIe, ISA, VME) reference depends on the CPU,
but a wild gu
OK. I'm about special network tweaks or something like this. For
example, for FreeBSD there is a sysctl tweaks that give zero CPU load on
100 Mbps traffic with PRO1000/PT NIC, and about 10% CPU load without
these tweaks on same hardware and in same conditions.
27.10.2011 22:54, Josh Hoppes P?P
[IMAGE]
Pms de Mixico prestigiada firma de Capacitacisn presenta:
Licitaciones Pzblicas para la CFE
15 de Noviembre, Ciudad de Mixico.
Promociones especiales por cierre de aqo.
Experto consultor Mtro. Alberto Ledesma G.
Obtenga las herramientas necesarias para alcanzar un sptimo desempeqo en
su fun
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:23 PM, tx wrote:
> Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between several 1GBE
> links) with standard x86 CPU such as Xeon or Opteron and "accelerated" NICs
> like Intel PRO1000/PT? All with latest stable OpenBSD, of course :) Any
> suggestions, tweaks, spe
The only limitation I've seen lately to OpenBSD pushing packets is how
many interrupts it can handle. I don't know if 5.0 has helped with
this but 4.9 still appeared to be limited to CPU0 for processing
interrupts.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> 5.0 may be able to do th
On 10/25/11 6:20 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> I had some similar looking problems some releases back. Using a separate
> carp if for ipv6 mostly fixed it. Didn't write down the exact problem,
> though.
>
Had a similar issue awhile back, with duplicate messages due to both pf
boxes thinking they wer
5.0 may be able to do this or close to it as long as you aren't load up lots of
pf rules (perhaps, leave pf off entirely)
the intel or broadcom gig nics should both be in the game here.
tx [zzw...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between
> several 1GB
Is it possible to make 1 Mpps router (BGP and routing between several
1GBE links) with standard x86 CPU such as Xeon or Opteron and
"accelerated" NICs like Intel PRO1000/PT? All with latest stable
OpenBSD, of course :) Any suggestions, tweaks, special techniques for
that case, any documentation
On 27/10/2011 17:44, Theo de Raadt wrote:
NETWORK SYNCHRONISATION
States can be synchronised between two or more firewalls using this
interface, by specifying a synchronisation interface using ifconfig(8).
Heading back to my reading lessons ;) Thanks for pointing it out.
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01:11AM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
> > pfsync has been using multicast by default for a long time, I think
> > possibly from the start. You have to explicitly define a "syncpeer" if
> > you want it unicast. The list probably ignored the question because
> > the answer wa
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:01:11AM -0500, Josh Hoppes wrote:
> pfsync has been using multicast by default for a long time, I think
> possibly from the start. You have to explicitly define a "syncpeer" if
> you want it unicast. The list probably ignored the question because
> the answer was clear in
pfsync has been using multicast by default for a long time, I think
possibly from the start. You have to explicitly define a "syncpeer" if
you want it unicast. The list probably ignored the question because
the answer was clear in the documentation.
Se tiver problemas para visualizar este e-mail, acesse aqui.
Nota Certa
Deixe o Nota Certa fazer todo o trabalho para vocj e pague ss R$ 9,90
mensais por 3 estados + Instbncias superiores
Sistema de administragco - Painel Private - Como em um Webmail - Em
qualquer lugar
O No
On 10/27/2011 03:16 PM, Laurent CARON wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:46:49PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently wondering what is the best way to run pfsync between 4 hosts.
If I'm not mistaken, pfsync only has one interface, aka pfsync0
If I use it in unicast mode, i'm then stu
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:46:49PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently wondering what is the best way to run pfsync between 4 hosts.
>
> If I'm not mistaken, pfsync only has one interface, aka pfsync0
>
> If I use it in unicast mode, i'm then stuck to 2 nodes.
>
> The option wou
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM, OpenBSD Europe wrote:
> We have started shipping OpenBSD 5.0 :-)
>
All orders have been shipped (only a couple remaining which will be
shipped tomorrow).
Hi,
I'm seeing these in the pflog off my firewall:
Oct 27 15:20:32.845671 rule def/(short) pass in on vlanxxx:
218.76.138.156.0 > x.x.x.63.0: udp 17035
Oct 27 15:21:12.924605 rule def/(short) pass in on vlanxxx:
218.76.138.156.0 > x.x.x.38.0: udp 17035
Oct 27 15:21:15.652141 rule def/(short) pa
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Maxim Bourmistrov
wrote:
>
> Well, it is idle so far as it is not able to take care of dhcp-clients -
dhcpd listens on CARP which is not available at the moment.
> This box is a slave to the named too, but updates of zone are not so
frequent due to the LAN-side.
>
Please stop feeding the troll, just ignore this thread and let it die.
Zantgo, respect the effort people in this list are doing to help
people like you and me by giving all necessary input.
READ this page before you send another email to the list:
http://www.openbsd.org/mail.html
Best regards Jo
Hello Stefan,
> 1.Do I need to configure symon.conf only? Do I need to
customize c_config.sh to
> meet my specific requirement because c_config.sh
file contains and collect
> interface and io information only?
It's not
important which file to use and where is the file. Start symon and symux
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 08:22:35PM -0300, Zantgo wrote:
> WTF? I use OpenBSD and hate the other operating systems
And we hate your retarted questions!
j.
25 matches
Mail list logo