On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, TS Lura wrote:
> Dear OpenBSD community,
>
>
> I have been tasked with figuring out which supplier of networking equipment
> we should buy for our networking edge. I am working on my own report. But
> it would be nice to hear about your experiences , since I think
2012/3/22 f5b :
> 1. www.openbsd.org is UTC
> http://www.openbsd.org/51.html
> $OpenBSD: 51.html,v 1.17 2012/03/23 02:04:39 henning Exp $
man rcs
Read the description of $Id$ (which is what $OpenBSD$ is a version of).
1. www.openbsd.org is UTC
http://www.openbsd.org/51.html
$OpenBSD: 51.html,v 1.17 2012/03/23 02:04:39 henning Exp $
2. ftp.openbsd.org is MDT
3. mail list is MDT
Changes by: henn...@cvs.openbsd.org 2012/03/22 20:04:39
MDT (C Mountain Daylight Time
Time zone offset: UTC - 6 hours
Hi,
Not sure, never tried it myself but I think you need to set advskew to the
same for all carp nodes. you have it on 100 and 0.
greets
marco
On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:09 PM, Joao Ronaldo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I followed the instructions in the carp man page example to setup a pair
> of firewalls in ac
Hi,
I've the same problem for over 2 years now, never figured it out. Did not
invest much time though :-)
I tried it with multicast and unicast, currently its like that:
host 1
/usr/sbin/dhcpd -y 172.16.106.252 -Y 172.16.106.253 vlan703
host 2
/usr/sbin/dhcpd -y 172.16.106.253 -Y 172.16.106.252
* Paketix [2012-03-22 08:51]:
> i am using multiple rtables to separate traffic from different zones on my
> openbsd 5.0 firewall
> is there a way to limit pf states *per zone / rtable* so that a single zone
> cannot eat up all states?
> if a zone is able to fill up the state table this will be ki
01.jpg
02.jpg
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
f1bcc747f2b6c22596744ec0bf232a66]
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of
2670a24133454660e454c527b00f41c6]
Hi again,
The strange thing is that spamd is getting the sync messages from
the master firewall and updating the spamd tables and log files.
But, although the dhcpd sync messages seem to go through the
em0 iface, the dhcpd in the backup firewall is not displaying
sync updates in the log file
Dear OpenBSD community,
I have been tasked with figuring out which supplier of networking equipment
we should buy for our networking edge. I am working on my own report. But
it would be nice to hear about your experiences , since I think there are
many in here which are experienced in networking.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:18:43AM +0100, Peter Hessler wrote:
> from what I can tell, the problems blocking this diff from going in have
> been fixed, and it looks good to me.
(Putting misc@ on Cc so that everyone interested gets this information.)
There is more to this than the wcwidth() bug (w
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your hint.
Now, I can see (what I guess should be) the sync packets
going through the em0 iface:
07:54:32.877138 00:22:64:89:64:79 01:00:5e:00:01:f0 0800
142: 10.1.1.2.8067 > 224.0.1.240.8067: udp 100 [ttl 1]
(id 20862, len 128)
07:54:32.877187 00:22:64:89:67:6a 01:00:
i am using multiple rtables to separate traffic from different zones on my
openbsd 5.0 firewall
is there a way to limit pf states *per zone / rtable* so that a single zone
cannot eat up all states?
if a zone is able to fill up the state table this will be kind of a DOS
other zones are no longer a
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:14:51PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if there any plans on adding multibyte support for ls(1)?
> > Or maybe there's a reason why it's not a great idea (which I am not
> > aware of)?
> > Anyway, here's a patch I have. It's based on DragonFlyB
yeah.
I upgraded it from 5.0 to snapshot, but just found there is no
"thunar" package in snapshot. so I'm running everything else in snapshot
with thunar still in 5.0. That's very likely the cause of library
connflicts.
I'm compiling thunar from updated ports now ...
thanks.
On Thu, Mar 22, 201
14 matches
Mail list logo
