On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 07:37:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 17:56, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> > On 07/13/2012 05:13 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 16:06, Andres Perera wrote:
> >>
> >>> you did! you explicitly said that it would be advantageous for
> >>>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 17:56, Geoff Steckel wrote:
> On 07/13/2012 05:13 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 16:06, Andres Perera wrote:
>>
>>> you did! you explicitly said that it would be advantageous for
>>> programs looking to perform analysis on captured packets. for those
>>> p
Hello,
does anybody know why does cvsync create empty 'cvsync' dir
inside the prefix for repositories?
The config is same style as on OpenBSD page with refuse file
excluding 'X11' and 'XF4'.
(here localhost is ftp5.eu.openbsd.org via http proxy)
# cvsync -c /etc/cvsync.conf
Connecting to loca
On Fri Jul 13 2012 23:58, frantisek holop wrote:
> hi there,
>
> how different is the code path between reboot(8), halt(8)
> and when i press the power button?
>
> the reason i ask is, that fairly often, reboot(8) and halt(8)
> "hangs" (X disappears, but there is only black screen,
> and the cons
On 07/13/2012 02:05 PM, Gonzalo L. R. wrote:
Conf file?
El 07/13/12 11:38, Limaunion escribió:
hi all! I'm running unbound as a caching resolver in an ALIX box running
OpenBSD 5.1.
For some reason I'm getting many of these kind of errors:
Jul 13 10:56:29 pfire unbound: [11449:0] notice: sendt
hi there,
how different is the code path between reboot(8), halt(8)
and when i press the power button?
the reason i ask is, that fairly often, reboot(8) and halt(8)
"hangs" (X disappears, but there is only black screen,
and the console never appears, no "syncing disks" message),
but pressing the
On 07/13/2012 05:13 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 16:06, Andres Perera wrote:
you did! you explicitly said that it would be advantageous for
programs looking to perform analysis on captured packets. for those
programs, it turns out the placement of the filter doesn't matter
Su
hmm, on Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:53:46AM +0300, Manolis Tzanidakis said that
> On Sun (01/07/12), frantisek holop wrote:
> > it seems that since a couple of snapshots back,
> > load never goes below 1.00 anymore on both of my
> > notebooks (i386 MP). what prompted me to write
> > this email is that
the comparison started against freebsd bpf's augmentations:
"
Zero-copy buffer mode
bpf devices may also operate in the BPF_BUFMODE_ZEROCOPY mode, in which
packet data is written directly into two user memory buffers by the ker-
nel, avoiding both system call and copying overhead.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 16:06, Andres Perera wrote:
> you did! you explicitly said that it would be advantageous for
> programs looking to perform analysis on captured packets. for those
> programs, it turns out the placement of the filter doesn't matter
Sure it matters. Simple example: count pa
¡Muy Importante!
Si no puede visualizar correctamente este correo, le pedimos que lo arrastre a
su Bandeja de Entrada
Apreciable Ejecutivo:
TIEM de México
Empresa Líder en Capacitación y Actualización de Capital Humano
Pone a su disposición este Excelente Curso denominado:
"La Estrategia del Océ
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 22:03, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Michael W. Lucas [2012-07-13 21:46]:
>> I'm playing with softraid on a test machine. I reuse disks. This makes
>> me trip over metadata:
>>
>> # bioctl -c 1 -l sd2n,sd3n softraid0
>> softraid0: volume level does not match metadata level
>>
>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
>> for clients (processes) that need to do trivial filtering, e.g.,
>> tcpdump 'ether multicast and not broadcast', it's an overhaul for
>> nothing
>>
>> the placement of the filtering stack in the k
Claudio Jeker [cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com] wrote:
>
> > Why go through layers and layers of kernel processing for applications
> > that simply don't need to? That's the goal here. Not replacing BPF.
>
> You think it is better to go through layers and layers of userland code?
> In the end you need
for clients (processes) that need to do trivial filtering, e.g.,
tcpdump 'ether multicast and not broadcast', it's an overhaul for
nothing
the placement of the filtering stack in the kernel is completely
irrelevant to "how simple" it will end up. if you come up with a
sbin/bpfd it will still have
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
>
> i don't expect *every* application to manage the rx/tx rings directly,
> reinject when they're done
>
Let's be more practical here. Luigi already gives you a stub pcap library that
does this for you. You can take an existing pcap application, link it
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
> for clients (processes) that need to do trivial filtering, e.g.,
> tcpdump 'ether multicast and not broadcast', it's an overhaul for
> nothing
>
> the placement of the filtering stack in the kernel is completely
> irrelevant to "how simple" it will end up
* Michael W. Lucas [2012-07-13 21:46]:
> I'm playing with softraid on a test machine. I reuse disks. This makes
> me trip over metadata:
>
> # bioctl -c 1 -l sd2n,sd3n softraid0
> softraid0: volume level does not match metadata level
>
> # bioctl -c 5 -l sd2p,sd3p,sd4p,sd5p,sd6p softraid0
> soft
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:43:42PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > > But having a generic mechanism to bring network data in/out userland for
> > > analysis or manipulation, abstracted in a s
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
>
> so i should move the whole filtering stack to userland... seems like a
> needless work for simple packet capture
And I completely disagree.
You think what the kernel does now is simple ?
from their site:
netmap implements a special device, /dev/netmap, which is the gateway
to switch one or more network cards to netmap mode, where the card's
datapath is disconnected from the operating system.
open("/dev/netmap") returns a file descriptor that can be used with
ioctl(fd, NIOCREG, ...
Andres Perera [andre...@zoho.com] wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > But having a generic mechanism to bring network data in/out userland for
> > analysis or manipulation, abstracted in a secure way from the kernel across
> > multiple network card types, and "z
Hi,
I'm playing with softraid on a test machine. I reuse disks. This makes
me trip over metadata:
# bioctl -c 1 -l sd2n,sd3n softraid0
softraid0: volume level does not match metadata level
# bioctl -c 5 -l sd2p,sd3p,sd4p,sd5p,sd6p softraid0
softraid0: not all chunks are of the native metadata fo
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> But having a generic mechanism to bring network data in/out userland for
analysis or manipulation, abstracted in a secure way from the kernel across
multiple network card types, and "zero copy", could be very useful. The
typical response t
Conf file?
El 07/13/12 11:38, Limaunion escribió:
> hi all! I'm running unbound as a caching resolver in an ALIX box running
> OpenBSD 5.1.
>
> For some reason I'm getting many of these kind of errors:
>
> Jul 13 10:56:29 pfire unbound: [11449:0] notice: sendto failed: No
> buffer space availabl
I'm porting it for myself, although I stopped for a while because nobody else
showed much interest in it. I have the opposite view of Claudio, I'd love to
have this capability. It looks attractive for things like high-speed packet
capture and analysis. For re-implementing things that are already
OBSERVATORIO ASTRONOMICO
AMPIMPA
TUCUMAN - ARGENTINA
Declarado de Interés Educativo por el Ministerio de Educación de la
Nación
_
misc@openbsd.org
At.
Campamento Científico Internacional
- SolarMax 2012 -
La Ciencia en el Aula Nuevos enfoques didácticos
Organiza:
Observatorio Astronómic
hi all! I'm running unbound as a caching resolver in an ALIX box running
OpenBSD 5.1.
For some reason I'm getting many of these kind of errors:
Jul 13 10:56:29 pfire unbound: [11449:0] notice: sendto failed: No
buffer space available
Jul 13 10:56:29 pfire unbound: [11449:0] notice: remote addr
Cómo Optimizar el Control Interno para la Prevención de Fraudes
Panama 18 de julio, 2012
La auditorÃa periódica es una actividad básica para identificar fallas
de control y para la detección de fraudes, sin embargo... ¿Nuestro
personal tiene la experiencia necesaria para desarrollar las func
Si no podes visualizar este mail, ingresa a:
http://news1.bonuscupon.com.ar/r.html?uid=1.1y.29hh.y7.f19d9h9r09
On 13 July 2012 15:16, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>>> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
>>> rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
>>
>> I beli
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
>> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
>> rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
>
> I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only wit
On 13 July 2012 14:42, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
> rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
> Or is there any backport?
> Thanks
>
Can you give it a spin ? 5.1 uses uthreads still, this problem might
appear more often with rthreads,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
> rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
I believe the problem didn't exhibit with uthreads. It's only with
the switch to rthreads that it became a problem.
Philip Guen
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Paolo Aglialoro wrote:
> This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
> rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
> Or is there any backport?
Nope. 5.1 has 0.12.9/0.8.9
(and 5.2 will have the same, since I'm going to rollback from
0.13.2/0.9.2
Keyboard and touchpad only work after a cold boot. And by cold
boot I mean pull out AC and detach the battery.
OpenBSD 5.2-beta (GENERIC.MP) #347: Wed Jul 11 02:33:30 MDT 2012
t...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 4285202432 (4086MB)
avail mem = 414876467
This means that 5.1-release will still be affected by the bug so that
rtorrent won't run correctly, right?
Or is there any backport?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:31 PM, David Coppa wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Bolgheroni
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:21:06AM +
On 7/13/12, Bahador NazariFard wrote:
> Hi y'all.
> I have a question about netmap - a novel framework for fast packet I/O.
> Does OpenBSD have any plan to support Netmap framework?
> I also have a technical question about netmap and firewall relation.
> As I read and understand we can work with n
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:00:58AM +0430, Bahador NazariFard wrote:
> Hi y'all.
> I have a question about netmap - a novel framework for fast packet I/O.
> Does OpenBSD have any plan to support Netmap framework?
> I also have a technical question about netmap and firewall relation.
> As I read and
© 2012 Conference Corporativo S.C.
Incluye Temas Critícos Sobre:
Cierre de Gestión, Observaciones y Responsabilidades
LOS 45 MEJORES CURSOS SOBRE
ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA y GOBIERNO Cursos, Contenidos y
Metodologías Desarrollados en Alianza con las
Mejores Universidades Europeas con Calidad ISO 900
Well i would go with Test server where i would take a month to go
through OS and setting up running as my requirements..
at least.
Then i will make migration plan and make test migrate from FreeBSD to
OpenBSD ...then will make clean Server instal and do migrate my data.
Hope this helps .;)
As
Hi y'all.
I have a question about netmap - a novel framework for fast packet I/O.
OpenBSD packet I/O is already very fast from what i tested :)
43 matches
Mail list logo