On Monday, July 30, 2012 03:38:58 pm you wrote:
> On 2012-07-30, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> > Given a machine with two interfaces to the internet, is there a way to
> > enforce symmectric routing (i.e. if1 and if2 with if1 as the default
> > route, can connections to if2 be somehow routed back out if2)
El Gerente de Ventas como Administrador, Vendedor y Líder
Panama 08 de Agosto, 2012
Los Gerentes de Ventas tienen en sus manos uno de los procesos más importantes
y fundamentales para el ÉXITO o FRACASO de las empresas, por lo que
constantemente se ven obligados y presionados ante las situaciones
On 2012-07-30, Jeff Simmons wrote:
> Given a machine with two interfaces to the internet, is there a way to
> enforce
> symmectric routing (i.e. if1 and if2 with if1 as the default route, can
> connections to if2 be somehow routed back out if2)?
>
> pf's reply-to and route-to perform this quite
On 2012-07-30, Bernd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is this proc.c privsep reorganization issue thing in relayd still a
> problem?
>
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=133293448804527
>
> Best,
>
> Bernd
>
>
Yes.
I can't speak for the rest of you, but I think this thing should be put to bed
now.
-eric
On Jul 30, 2012, at 11:35 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
> On 2012-07-27 15:41, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:36:38PM +1000, David Diggles wrote:
>>> The calomel pheno
Hello.
I'm pleased to announce that the registration for the EuroBSDcon 2012
conference in Warsaw, Poland is now officially open!
You can find all information about the conference at its official website:
http://2012.eurobsdcon.org/
More frequent updates will be posted to the conference
I've since been advised that a show of appreciation is better expressed
through donations. And they're coming - you have my word.
Tony
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Tony wrote:
> Dear Theo,
>
> This was not meant as a troll, sorry if it came off like that.
>
> It was more a show of apprecia
2012/7/30 Tony :
> This was not meant as a troll, sorry if it came off like that.
We'll believe that when Theo gets some of the money you saved.
Best
Martin
Dear Theo,
This was not meant as a troll, sorry if it came off like that.
It was more a show of appreciation for what you've achieved over the years
as well as a request for more topics to write about in my thesis.
Thank you for everything. Hope I get to meet you in real life some day -
drinks a
things clearer to myself as well as my coworkers - all of whom have been
using FreeBSD for the past 15 years. All of whom have recently converted to
OpenBSD due to the need for something simpler to base our million-dollar
webapps on.
Here are the outlines. I'd appreciate some feedback. I hope it
Indeed, Calomel has lots of reputation, that's why it ranks so high.
Reputation and popularity are 2 different things :)
google only count popularity
Everyone, please don't fall for the troll. If you must respond, talk
to
him privately.
If any of you want misc@ to be useful mailing list -- guess what -- it
starts by you making it useful.
true. sorry for not thinking that way at first.
Try this on your ssh session:
m a n space minus c space afterboot
With the "minus c" option, the "man" program doesn't use "more" and
shows the full man page. I guess that this behavior is better for your
screen reader because it only needs take into account the scroll of your
terminal.
On Sun,
Given a machine with two interfaces to the internet, is there a way to enforce
symmectric routing (i.e. if1 and if2 with if1 as the default route, can
connections to if2 be somehow routed back out if2)?
pf's reply-to and route-to perform this quite well for packets transversing a
router, but I
On 2012-07-27 15:41, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:36:38PM +1000, David Diggles wrote:
The calomel phenomenon is fascinating!
I was calomeled.
Those who have been calomeled have done the following:
1. lazily google: "openbsd tuning" (or similar)
2. click on:
> I'm about to write an article on OpenBSD's brilliant design, mainly to make
> things clearer to myself as well as my coworkers - all of whom have been
> using FreeBSD for the past 15 years. All of whom have recently converted to
> OpenBSD due to the need for something simpler to base our million-
Hello!
I'm about to write an article on OpenBSD's brilliant design, mainly to make
things clearer to myself as well as my coworkers - all of whom have been
using FreeBSD for the past 15 years. All of whom have recently converted to
OpenBSD due to the need for something simpler to base our million-
Have you looked here?
/usr/share/doc/html/httpd/
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 01:31:16PM -0400, sven falempin wrote:
> http://www.moko.ru/doc/apache/mod/mod_log_config.html#transferlog
>
> |followed by a command
>
> anything better ?
>
> thx to russia ...
>
> 2012/7/30 sven falempin
>
> > HEllo
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:27:47 -0400
sven falempin wrote:
> HEllo,
>
> I(and google) do not find the apache 1.3.29 documentation for editing conf
> file, neither information to syslog the apache logs.
>
> Pointer anyone ?
See /usr/share/doc/html/httpd/index.html and
/var/www/log/
But you may w
http://www.moko.ru/doc/apache/mod/mod_log_config.html#transferlog
|followed by a command
anything better ?
thx to russia ...
2012/7/30 sven falempin
> HEllo,
>
> I(and google) do not find the apache 1.3.29 documentation for editing conf
> file, neither information to syslog the apache logs.
>
Eric Oyen wrote:
they have. however, thermoform paper is actually more expensive than standard
paper stock.
Ah. Real-world economics scotches another clever techno solution :(
--
Jack Woehr # "We commonly say we have no time when,
Box 51, Golden CO 80402 # of course, we ha
HEllo,
I(and google) do not find the apache 1.3.29 documentation for editing conf
file, neither information to syslog the apache logs.
Pointer anyone ?
--
-
() ascii ribbon campai
* Bennett Samowich [120730 19:38]:
> The problem exists even if I use the system's "/usr/bin/false" and
> "/usr/bin/true" commands.
> The problem exists even when PF is disabled or the only rule is "pass in".
>
> That being said the script itself is a simple host lookup against the
> IP addresses
How do your interfaces get configured on boot? Is DHCP involved anywhere?
>From mygate(5):
"/etc/mygate is processed after all interfaces have been configured.
If any hostname.if(5) files contain ``dhcp'' directives, IPv4 entries
in /etc/mygate will be ignored."
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:40
On 07/30/2012 06:02 PM, Bennett Samowich wrote:
The problem exists even if I use the system's "/usr/bin/false" and
"/usr/bin/true" commands.
The problem exists even when PF is disabled or the only rule is "pass in".
That being said the script itself is a simple host lookup against the
IP address
The problem exists even if I use the system's "/usr/bin/false" and
"/usr/bin/true" commands.
The problem exists even when PF is disabled or the only rule is "pass in".
That being said the script itself is a simple host lookup against the
IP addresses to ensure the DNS server is actually resolving.
there is strange behaviour in 5.1.
before reboot:
# cat /etc/mygate
192.168.2.80
# ls -la /etc/mygate
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 13 Jul 30 13:15 /etc/mygate
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33196
...
em0: flags=28843 mtu 1500
..
status: active
inet 192.168.2.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.2.
I've uncovered a troubling performance symptom that I believe is
related to relayd's "check script" functionality.
The system is a Dell R710 with 12GB RAM and 10Gb interfaces. The
problem is that when relayd is running with redirects that uses the
check script functionality, performance of the in
28 matches
Mail list logo
