Hi Patrick,
My Gui problem is (was) quite similar. I was searching intensivly for a
correct,fast,non bloated desktop manager for years. I have checked at least
10 products ( non windows ) and in the end i felt depressed,like you.
So what saved my live ?
At work i had to build an environment for ja
Hi,
Over my wired network (not using authpf) I can connect to ftp sites
over ftp-proxy fine. Similarly when connecting to ftp sites over my
wifi without authpf. However, using authpf on my wifi gives me
errors when connecting to ftp sites over ftp-proxy.
In man authpf(8) the following configur
On 2013/05/26 12:52, Cesar Calvo wrote:
> Hi, thanks for sharing
>
> >http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=134643340822363
> >hostname.if:
> > !route add -llinfo -iface -net 10.255.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 -ifp nfe0
> > inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255
> > inet 1.2.4.3 255.255.255.255
> > ...
> >
> >
Hi,
On 05/26/13 05:21, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
I am still on Linux on my primary desktop. I loaded a few GNUstep apps
from the repos, your right, they don't look that bad and yes, I am
sure they can be tweaked even if they did.
Your sleek theme looks very promising.
:) good.
Yes plotting
The same seems to be the case for amd64. Anyway, spite error
warnings, X works.
Zoran
Hi Luiz,
I actually have seen that on a bridge setup I had, too.
Although the divert-to points to localhost, I see the packet trying to pass out
on the interface to the original destination, as your data shows, too.
No idea why that's happening though.
\Patrick
Am 23.05.2013 um 22:45 schrieb L
Hi, thanks for sharing
>http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=134643340822363
>hostname.if:
> !route add -llinfo -iface -net 10.255.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 -ifp nfe0
> inet 1.2.3.4 255.255.255.255
> inet 1.2.4.3 255.255.255.255
> ...
>
>mygate:
> 10.255.255.1
I change all inet values for sanbo
Hi,
be careful with the latest x sets on sparc64 from 2013-05-26. The shared
X libs which were updated recently are missing.
Regards,
Markus
On 2013-05-25, Cesar Calvo wrote:
> Hi people.
> I have a linux server a try to migrate to openbsd 5.3/amd64. I am totatly
> new in this amazing OS.
>
> In linux I have:
>
>- ip addr 200.124.200.125/32 dev net1
>- ip route add 190.64.x.x dev net1
>- ip route add default via 190.64.x.x
>> At the risk of sounding like an idiot, did you do anything particular in
>> the OpenBSD configuration to make Hyper-V's Legacy Network Adapter work?
>> I can't seem to make it do so--OpenBSD picks it up as de0, and I've
>> configured /etc/hostname.de0 appropriately. The same Hyper-V setup
>> wo
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Guillaume Filion writes:
>
>> I did some tests with OpenBSD 5.3 running as a Hyper-V 2012 virtual
>> machine and the performance is disappointing (see
>> http://guillaume.filion.org/blog/archives/2013/05/openbsd_networking_performance_hype
11 matches
Mail list logo