On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:37:30AM BST, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > The FAQ gets updated when the new release is out. Not before.
> >
> > Following that chain of thought, shouldn't manual pages, or any official
> > documents referenced in the FAQ for that matter, default to '-release'
> > (or '-sta
> > The FAQ gets updated when the new release is out. Not before.
>
> Following that chain of thought, shouldn't manual pages, or any official
> documents referenced in the FAQ for that matter, default to '-release'
> (or '-stable') rather than '-current'?
They should reference -release or -stabl
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:14:11AM BST, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> The FAQ gets updated when the new release is out. Not before.
Following that chain of thought, shouldn't manual pages, or any official
documents referenced in the FAQ for that matter, default to '-release'
(or '-stable') rather than '
On April 2, 2014 8:14:11 AM CEST, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On April 2, 2014 6:41:01 AM CEST, Raf Czlonka
> wrote:
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >As I go through the FAQ I've noticed a httpd(8) online manual page
>> >missing[0]. The link in question comes from 4.8 section[1] of the
>FAQ:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >/v
> On April 2, 2014 6:41:01 AM CEST, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >As I go through the FAQ I've noticed a httpd(8) online manual page
> >missing[0]. The link in question comes from 4.8 section[1] of the FAQ:
> >
> >[...]
> >/var/www: OpenBSD's web server lives here.
> >[...]
> >
> >[0] http:
On April 2, 2014 6:41:01 AM CEST, Raf Czlonka wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>As I go through the FAQ I've noticed a httpd(8) online manual page
>missing[0]. The link in question comes from 4.8 section[1] of the FAQ:
>
>[...]
>/var/www: OpenBSD's web server lives here.
>[...]
>
>[0] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-
Hi all,
As I go through the FAQ I've noticed a httpd(8) online manual page
missing[0]. The link in question comes from 4.8 section[1] of the FAQ:
[...]
/var/www: OpenBSD's web server lives here.
[...]
[0] http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=httpd&sektion=8
[1] http://www.openbsd.org/faq
My emails do not often get to the list for some reason so that is why you get
this reply to you own address as well.
Anyway, why don't you try using ports, which should be better than trying to
adapt information valid for a three-year old, unsupported version? There is an
effort ongoing to try
I am trying to get Gnome to work, and its giving me fits. I tryed to follow
this link:
Tutorial: Install Gnome Desktop and Gnome Display Manager on
OpenBSD 4.8 - GabSoftware
for the most part, but now instead of boot to gdm
or xdm it boots to the console and when I startx. itÂ
says file
/root/.se
Jim Rowan wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to resurrect some neoware ca22 thinclient boxes, and seeing
strange behavior I don't know how to interpret.
What can I do next?
I have used quite a few Neoware thin clients for OpenBSD (and FreeBSD)
systems. I boot from an USB floppy or CD on those that supp
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:25 PM, sven falempin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A few days ago i was asking about pids and learn something.
>
> I am monitoring closely some interfaces and expect to move this into
> ifstated as a configuration.
> I am trying to keep it simple and i do a proto in perl.
>
> There
Hello,
A few days ago i was asking about pids and learn something.
I am monitoring closely some interfaces and expect to move this into
ifstated as a configuration.
I am trying to keep it simple and i do a proto in perl.
There is multiple default routes, and i want to test if the underlying
netw
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:06:44AM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Emilio Perea [epe...@walkereng.com] wrote:
> > When using the latest snapshot, some ssh clients are unable to connect.
> > I don't know whether this is due to a problem with the client or the
> > server, but hope someone can point m
After updating my primary firewall to current, the pfsync initial sync
does not end.
Primary firewall is
OpenBSD 5.5-current (GENERIC.MP) #0: Tue Apr 1 19:26:27 EEST 2014
with latest 5.5 errata applied,
secondary firewall is a bit older but I'm afraid to update cause this
might be the only w
On 01/04/14 18:32, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I had the following rule in pf which served me well so far. After
updating today to current (from 5.4 Jan)
icmp replied from firewall stopped working.
# pfctl -sr | head -2
pass in log quick on vlan101 inet from 192.168.1.1 to (vlan101) flags
Emilio Perea [epe...@walkereng.com] wrote:
> When using the latest snapshot, some ssh clients are unable to connect.
> I don't know whether this is due to a problem with the client or the
> server, but hope someone can point me in the right direction. If it is a
> server problem, I will of course s
When using the latest snapshot, some ssh clients are unable to connect.
I don't know whether this is due to a problem with the client or the
server, but hope someone can point me in the right direction. If it is a
server problem, I will of course send a proper bug report.
I first noticed the probl
Hi,
I had the following rule in pf which served me well so far. After
updating today to current (from 5.4 Jan)
icmp replied from firewall stopped working.
# pfctl -sr | head -2
pass in log quick on vlan101 inet from 192.168.1.1 to (vlan101) flags
S/SA keep state (no-sync) reply-to 10.1.101.1
Jim Rowan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to resurrect some neoware ca22 thinclient boxes, and seeing
> strange behavior I don't know how to interpret.
>
> I have a bootable 5.4 usb stick. If I put that in the box, right
> after the initial bios boot screen (after it says "via c7 1.0Ghz"),
Hi Stuart,
I have tried with a carp netmask equal to the physical interface (/24
for example in my lab) and a /32 (like when you have many CARP IP
addresses).
From investigation the problem seems to occur because when a box is the
carp master, their will be a /32 route in the routing table f
On 2014-04-01, Andy wrote:
> Specifically to accommodate CARP interfaces, to allow setting the
> nexthop on an announced route to a CARP IP address?
>
> This currently doesn't work as OpenBGPD considers the CARP interface as
> being a different network to the physical interface, even though they
On Tue 01 Apr 2014 10:27:03 BST, Andy wrote:
On Tue 01 Apr 2014 10:10:02 BST, Andy wrote:
Hi Claudio and Stuart, thanks for your replies.
On Mon 31 Mar 2014 22:29:47 BST, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:59:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/03/31 09:31, Andy wrote:
H
On Tue 01 Apr 2014 10:10:02 BST, Andy wrote:
Hi Claudio and Stuart, thanks for your replies.
On Mon 31 Mar 2014 22:29:47 BST, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:59:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/03/31 09:31, Andy wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Does Henning, Claudio or any of the
Definitely agree Theo. Our topology is less than ideal just to ensure
we have OSPF's fast convergence changing the nexthops of our intra-AS
routers for what are otherwise BGP routes.
Whilst people say bird 1.4 supports BFD, BIRD is generally used on
Linux route servers (not forwarding traffic)
Hi Claudio and Stuart, thanks for your replies.
On Mon 31 Mar 2014 22:29:47 BST, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 07:59:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014/03/31 09:31, Andy wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Does Henning, Claudio or any of the other developers have any plan to
implement B
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 01:08:12PM +0200, Thorleif Wiik [BCIX] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > were running OpenBGPd since a long a time as route servers.
>
> I guess those are configured as route-reflectors. Correct?
>
As a route server d
Hello
Since around the snapshot of 28 March rss2email has been delivering
its feeds with no "from" header field containing the feed name, so
everything appears as if from the default sender
(b...@dev.null.invalid). I don't think there have been any changes
related to rss2email, so does this imply
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 13:16 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Imre Oolberg wrote:
> ...
> > But i wonder how i could ask the system how much are the so to say
> > ulimits of the running unbound process, e.g. number of open files?
>
> There's currently no way to do
28 matches
Mail list logo
