i will provide some outputs tonight
2014-05-07 8:12 GMT+02:00 Isak Lyberth i...@lyberth.dk:
i will make some dumps tonight
2014-05-06 23:56 GMT+02:00 Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com:
On 06/05/14 8:31 AM, Isak Lyberth wrote:
They are not discovered by OpenBSD when i put them in my computer
Why does BSD tar complain about long file names, and GNU does not?
I'm running amd64.
Thanks
Thank you for reply.
I have been trying some trial and error tests, and I came to similar
conclusion, but I would like to understand the design idea behind match
rule.
Who wins, the first or the last matching rule? Or do they all stick
together? What if they are conflicting, like in this case?
On 05/07/2014 12:17 PM, Marko Cupać wrote:
Thank you for reply.
I have been trying some trial and error tests, and I came to similar
conclusion, but I would like to understand the design idea behind match
rule.
Who wins, the first or the last matching rule? Or do they all stick
together?
On Wed, 07 May 2014 12:23:12 +0200
Blaise Hizded bla...@ovh.fr wrote:
As Henning Brauer said, the rewrite are applied immediately. So the
first match rule will rewrite IP from the packet and the second match
will be evaluated on the new IP rewritten.
There is no win, the packet is passed thru
On 05/07/2014 12:41 PM, Marko Cupać wrote:
On Wed, 07 May 2014 12:23:12 +0200
Blaise Hizded bla...@ovh.fr wrote:
As Henning Brauer said, the rewrite are applied immediately. So the
first match rule will rewrite IP from the packet and the second match
will be evaluated on the new IP
Hello list, first post here \o/
The question is about drivers for Intel HD Graphics 3000 rev 0x09
(not a hybrid with some nVIDIA nonsense).
When I run X, I get the following result (from Xorg.0.log):
```
[ 42880.697] (II) LoadModule: intel
[ 42880.698] (II) Loading
Could be that the standard for tar specifies a max length and that gnu tar
either uses some extension for longer names, or it just doesn't care.
2014-05-07 11:05 GMT+02:00 Robert Connolly rob...@secondfloor.ca:
Why does BSD tar complain about long file names, and GNU does not?
I'm running
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello list, first post here \o/
The question is about drivers for Intel HD Graphics 3000 rev 0x09
(not a hybrid with some nVIDIA nonsense).
When I run X, I get the following result (from Xorg.0.log):
```
[
I'm so sorry!
http://f.nn.lv/n5/7c/ii/dmesg.full
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Tomas Bodzar tomas.bod...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Manuel Pages
amarr.industr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello list, first post here \o/
The question is about drivers for Intel HD Graphics
The exact error message is always helpfull.
Nevertheless, see man 1 pax and search for ustar
GNU tar uses a extended tar format to store longer pathnames.
Ben
On 05/07/14 11:05, Robert Connolly wrote:
Why does BSD tar complain about long file names, and GNU does not?
Em 07-05-2014 08:36, Janne Johansson escreveu:
Could be that the standard for tar specifies a max length and that gnu tar
either uses some extension for longer names, or it just doesn't care.
2014-05-07 11:05 GMT+02:00 Robert Connolly rob...@secondfloor.ca:
Why does BSD tar complain about
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm so sorry!
http://f.nn.lv/n5/7c/ii/dmesg.full
Thx
First of all I will be focusing on why you can't see more then 1 core out
of your CPU. 5 BIOS updates are missing on your computer. Maybe OpenBSD
will not be ok
Wow, I didn't catch it. It's kinda shocking.
Is there any data bank regarding Thinkpads, it's BIOS and OpenBSD?
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.comwrote:
Wow, I didn't catch it. It's kinda shocking.
Is there any data bank regarding Thinkpads, it's BIOS and OpenBSD?
Yes, in my head and on Internet :-)
1) Checked your dmesg
2) Saw issue with cpu
3) Checked BIOS in
Hi,
Is there a way to force the disabling of flow control on em(4)?
Henning said (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=123003276308084w=2):
flow control is enabled on openbsd whenever the peer supports it; done
in the autonegotiation phase. there is no button to turn it off. why
should there?
On Tue, 6 May 2014 13:09:25 -0600
Daniel Melameth dan...@melameth.com wrote:
I believe this has been resolved in
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/systat/pftop.c.diff?r1=1.24;r2=1.25,
but I have not yet confirmed.
I have also noticed that output of 'systat queues' shows much
Dear Tomaš,
thank you so much for your support, thanks to you I felt encouraged to
finally
update my BIOS. It solved the driver problem (and by the looks of it,
improved
fan performance, but it's handwaving); however as far as I can tell from
dmesg
and system performance, only one core is used
On 7 May 2014 04:11, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-05-02, Thorsten Bonck thors...@bonck.net wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
maybe you could try to put pppoe0 on
On sze, máj 07, 2014 at 02:21:38 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
What arch is this Daniel? I've done multiple 5.4-5.5 upgrades
with OpenLDAP/bdb without need for additional steps, but they were
all on amd64.
[...]
Oh, this was i386.
Daniel
--
LÉVAI Dániel
PGP key ID = 0x83B63A8F
Key
I see you compile the kernel by yourself, GENERIC.MP is what you want.
- Ben
On 05/07/14 15:40, Manuel Pages wrote:
Dear Tomaš,
thank you so much for your support, thanks to you I felt encouraged to
finally
update my BIOS. It solved the driver problem (and by the looks of it,
improved
fan
Rebuilding kernel helped.
Now I run -current MP kernel and everything works like a charm.
Much love and gratefulness to you, Tomash.
(still did not receive the 5.5 cd btw)
I built a bsd.rd with a bigger ramdisk, MINIROOT is 35840 (0x8C00).
i do make bsd.rd and everythings build fine, but the kernel does not boot
i have just time to see the first number of loading [x]
and instant reboot, i have no COM output on this
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.comwrote:
Rebuilding kernel helped.
Now I run -current MP kernel and everything works like a charm.
Much love and gratefulness to you, Tomash.
Happy to help. Welcome in OpenBSD where 99% of time everything works and
fault is
Dear list,
Using manuals I have figured out how to follow
-current by means of buliding kernel and rebuilding
userspace. Also I can see that with a known amount
of caution it's possiblle to use snapshots with -current
and update userspace with pkg_add -u.
What escapes my mind though is how do sets
Errata: ``snapshot pigs'' should read
``snapshot pkgs''.
Please blame automatic completion.
On May 7, 2014 6:51 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
Using manuals I have figured out how to follow
-current by means of buliding kernel and rebuilding
userspace. Also I
I just upgraded a friend's somewhat geriatric i386 box from 5.4-release
to 5.5-release. On 5.5 the console is getting spammed with acpitz0:
_AL0[0] _PR0 failed. This didn't happen with 5.4, or for that matter,
any previous version of OpenBSD that's been on it that I can remember.
dmesg follows:
On 2014-05-07 11:52, Manuel Pages wrote:
Errata: ``snapshot pigs'' should read
``snapshot pkgs''.
Please blame automatic completion.
On May 7, 2014 6:51 PM, Manuel Pages amarr.industr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear list,
Using manuals I have figured out how to follow
-current by means of buliding
Hi Manuel,
Manuel Pages wrote on Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:51:00PM +0300:
Using manuals I have figured out how to follow
-current by means of buliding kernel and rebuilding
userspace.
There is usually no need to do that, unless you want to do
bleeding edge base system development and the
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 18:51, Manuel Pages wrote:
Dear list,
Using manuals I have figured out how to follow
-current by means of buliding kernel and rebuilding
userspace. Also I can see that with a known amount
of caution it's possiblle to use snapshots with -current
and update userspace
Donovan Watteau [tso...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to force the disabling of flow control on em(4)?
Henning said (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=123003276308084w=2):
flow control is enabled on openbsd whenever the peer supports it; done
in the autonegotiation phase. there
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 02:11:09AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-05-02, Thorsten Bonck thors...@bonck.net wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:14:40PM +, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:14:16PM +0200, thors...@bonck.net wrote:
maybe you could try to put pppoe0
2014-05-07 18:28 GMT+02:00 Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net:
Donovan Watteau [tso...@gmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to force the disabling of flow control on em(4)?
Henning said (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=123003276308084w=2):
flow control is enabled on openbsd whenever the
Donovan Watteau [tso...@gmail.com] wrote:
Yes, but I want to explicitly configure flow control, not speed or
duplex. AFAIK this can't be forced with mediaopt. And forcing
speed/duplex doesn't have any effect on the status of flow control.
Try it.
When I run X, I get the following result (from Xorg.0.log):
[...]
[ 42880.713] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphics: 2000-5000
[ 42880.713] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics: 5100
[ 42880.713] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics: 5200
[ 42880.713] (II)
maybe related?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=138183876907016w=2
I also stumbled over an old nawk short after, no clue if that could have
been invoked.
On 07.05.2014 04:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
What arch is this Daniel? I've done multiple 5.4-5.5 upgrades
with OpenLDAP/bdb without need
Alright, thanks for being ever-so-helpful.
I'll do my best to compile my understanding of the system
taking into account the response that is accumulated here.
As Mr. Grosse points out (and I was originally aware of it),
using snapshot userspace provides only an
approximation of current
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:27 AM, LEVAI Daniel l...@ecentrum.hu wrote:
I've recently upgraded one of my systems to 55 from 54 (btw, for me, the
most painful upgrade since ~3.9; I don't know what happened but
everything was against me), and one of the obstacles was the openldap
upgrade. I was
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
just22@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I google-ed a lot, but it seems that there is no trivial solution to
this point.
I extensively use console (and tmux), ending up with a lot of
simultaneously open shells; I normally
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:41:49PM +0300, Manuel Pages wrote:
As Mr. Grosse points out (and I was originally aware of it),
using snapshot userspace provides only an
approximation of current userspace without any
guarantees that snapshots
are up to date enough.
To be clear, I was speaking of
On 05/07/14 21:41, Manuel Pages wrote:
1. Know your mirror:
A person who wants to do that should find out the
policies of making snapshots for a particular mirror.
Depending on the architecture, mostly once a day. Which is enough!
I mean the OpenBSD userland. Package snapshots take a little
My advice is: stick to releases for now on important systems that
you mustn't break, but also setup on a spare machine or VM that you
don't mind breaking from time to time, use base os + package
snapshots, maybe play with compiling a few things yourself -
basically play around and find out what
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Daniel Melameth dan...@melameth.com wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
I have just upgraded (actually reinstalled from scratch) one of my
firewalls to 5.5 release, and I have noticed that 'systat queues' no
longer
My advice is: stick to releases for now on important systems that
you mustn't break, but also setup on a spare machine or VM that you
don't mind breaking from time to time, use base os + package
snapshots, maybe play with compiling a few things yourself -
basically play around and find out what
OpenBSDs userland is base qualified code such as nginx and extra
packages are kept separate in /usr/local.
For both snapshots and especially for building yourself follow
www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
For building from source; man release is brill.
Sync issues with packages built after
On 05/07/14 19:01, Stuart Henderson wrote:
My advice is: stick to releases for now on important systems that
you mustn't break, but also setup on a spare machine or VM that you
don't mind breaking from time to time, use base os + package
snapshots, maybe play with compiling a few things yourself
-Current is incredibly stable. Commits that break the tree are
fairly rare and get repaired quickly. Before using a -current
system in something important you want to test it, but you
want to test a stock -stable system before using it for your
applications, too. Most of my systems that I
Hi Tristan,
No, I'm trying to lock the wscons, not an X session...
Cheers
On 7 May 2014 22:42:35 CEST, Tristan PILAT tristan.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
just22@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I google-ed a lot, but it seems that there is
Hi Shawn,
This report needs more information.
First, could you upgrade to -current and see if the behaviour is
preserved?
Second, please share the acpidump on that machine, the apm performance
adjustment mode, the present fans and their status when this happens.
Thanks for the report,
Paul
49 matches
Mail list logo
