Hi misc@!
I run OpenBSD-{amd64,i386}-current for several years now on 3 machines,
having reinstalled everything late this summer because s.th. related to
either adsuck, ftp, cvs, pf or the netstack in general feels broken.
I have complained before in the last weeks but unfortunatelly the
usually
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff, 25 Oct 2014 22:21:
FWIW I use mbsync (from mail/isync) to sync Gmail to local maildir, and
have my mutt set up to work in maildir only. I set up cron to call
mbsync on schedule, and I from then I totally forgot about the
crappiness of Gmail's IMAP interface.
thanks for
memtest did not reveal errors.
unfortunately i got another panic,
during some routine file operations.
(after the 2 previous panics, fsck
required manual running, and even
multiple runs, so maybe this one
is choking on fsck's best efforts,
i dont know.)
savecore: reboot after panic:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 11:23:38PM -0400 or thereabouts, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
MY auction raised $1145.
There is no way that BoPF3 can POSSIBLY raise more than that!
Consider the gauntlet thrown.
Nice one Michael! :-)
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial applications.
thanks.
2014-10-26 20:02 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
Current hardware supports only 2^48...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Physical_address_space_details
Best
Martin
Hello,
I have a usecase for full disk encryption using softraid where the
keydisk is placed on the same harddrive as the encrypted partition. This
is not for protecting data on the drive in case it gets stolen, but
rather to allow for a quick way of making the data unrecoverable (by
destroying
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:27 AM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
memtest did not reveal errors.
unfortunately i got another panic,
during some routine file operations.
(after the 2 previous panics, fsck
required manual running, and even
multiple runs, so maybe this one
is choking
Hey List,
I am planning a new router / firewall / Wifi AP based on the Supermicro
SYS-5015A-EHF-D525
(http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816101364) and was
hoping that I could get some feedback on PCIe wifi cards.
After going over the wireless FAQ and then doing some
2014-10-26 22:31 GMT+01:00 Gordon Turner tur...@ftn.net:
Rosewill RNX-G300LX
(http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833166021)
- Up to 54Mbps
- Chipset RaLink RT2561/RT61
- Supported by ral
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man4/ral.4?query=ralsec=4
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 15:47:12 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail
From guent...@gmail.com Sun Oct 26 17:01:26 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
64-bit supposedly supports upto 16 exabytes of memory ('ram').
would such large capacities actually be possible to ue with
openbsd for amd64 architecture?
use-case: working with large in-memory storage for financial
Jim Rowan [j...@computing.com] wrote:
That's really odd... I cut/paste that line directly from the serial
console.. I don't know how it got to be showing 0x8096 instead of 0x8086.
Sorry for the false alarm! (I'll still have to track down what's wrong
with flashrd... as I want to use it.)
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us wrote:
...
thanks for the details, but, since i am nowhere close to being a
systems programmer, would like to know if there's any chance such
support might be added in, in the near future?
You're asking whether in the near
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:06:49 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass
2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
X-Original-To: mayur...@devio.us
Delivered-To: mayur...@devio.us
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at devio.us
Authentication-Results: wolfman.devio.us (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail
2014-10-27 3:37 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
From owner-misc+m143...@openbsd.org Sun Oct 26 22:22:57 2014
Fix your mail client, please.
256TB (2^48) should be good enough till 2020.
it is for a lot of records (data-sets) to held in memory instead
of
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014, at 10:21 PM, Martin Schröder wrote:
2014-10-27 1:56 GMT+01:00 Mayuresh Kathe mayur...@devio.us:
if the intended application actually requires larger memory to be
accessible, would it be better to go for a non-x86-64 64-bit hardware?
256TB (2^48) should be good enough
i am using mailx under openbsd, and instead of using the said
combination of tilde + p, i used tilde + m while attempting
to include original messages in my replies.
i apologize for the screw-up.
hello, i have been trying to fix the problem of mailx including the entire
header-set when issuing a tilde + m in a reply to include only the previous
emails body text (content).
one of the docs suggested using tilde + p, but dang, it didn't work for me
during tests executed just now.
if anyone
23 matches
Mail list logo
