On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Ignacio Ocampo wrote:
> I know that one of the goals of OpenBSD dev team is launch a new version
> every six months. I'm new here, and, I want to know, what is the best way
> to update OpenBSD? There is an automated way to do it?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Ignacio Ocampo
I know that one of the goals of OpenBSD dev team is launch a new version
every six months. I'm new here, and, I want to know, what is the best way
to update OpenBSD? There is an automated way to do it?
Thanks
--
Ignacio Ocampo Millán
We've been having a similar issue with keyboards on 5.1 with no X, and
when we upgraded to 5.5 recently we seem to still have it. All HP
hardware about 3 years old. You have to unplug the keyboard and plug
it into a different port, then return it back to the original to get
it back. Sometimes yo
On 17.12.2014. 6:34, Philip Guenther wrote:
Uh, ACPI *requires* that C1 exist. The halt instruction is defined as
entering C1, so not having C1 would mean your CPU lacks a basic
manadatory ia32 instruction. Hopefully the BIOS docs explain that
you're just disabling "deep" C-states or something
"Marko CupaÄ" hat am 18. Dezember 2014 um 16:41
geschrieben:
> What remains unanswered is why my 50⬠SSD gives worse throughput than
> 5⬠wifi adapter, but let's leave it for another thread.
The problem is not thruput but latency. Regarding thruput, a Mp3 file
anywhere
today is like a raindro
Hi Damo,
Damo Gets wrote on Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 01:08:57PM -0800:
> I've got a problem with a piece of non-BSD software that I'm running
> on my OpenBSD 5.4 system. I'm not looking to you guys for help with it
> at all; I'm working closely with the developers on it. However, it
> turns out t
> I've checked my ulimits, specifically 'ulimit -u' under the user that
> this is running as, and I'm only finding that it's 'unlimited'. As far
> as I know, that means that I _should_ be getting a core file
> somewhere. The process name is 'sbbs', and I've searched (as root) my
> entire filesy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've got a problem with a piece of non-BSD software that I'm running
on my OpenBSD 5.4 system. I'm not looking to you guys for help with it
at all; I'm working closely with the developers on it. However, it
turns out that it's not at a stage wher
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Using any OS on top of any virtual machine is like scratching your
> left year with your right leg as human. What is the noble purpose of
> doing that?
>
Gee whiz. How incredibly insightful.
Using any OS on top of any virtual machine is like scratching your
left year with your right leg as human. What is the noble purpose of
doing that?
I have update the graph about the sound system
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:38:49 +0100
Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> Yes this is right. Note that pograms can bypass sndiod seamlessly
> and use sio_xxx and mio_xxx functions to connect directly to the
> audio(4) and midi(4) layers. This is determined at
> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:41:56 +1000
> From: Jonathan Matthew
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:14:54PM +0100, Frederic Nowak wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > The diff for extracting memory ranges from ACPI was obviously not tested
> > with ACPI disabled...so we definitely have to check if the values in
>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:14:54PM +0100, Frederic Nowak wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The diff for extracting memory ranges from ACPI was obviously not tested
> with ACPI disabled...so we definitely have to check if the values in
> pcimem_range make some sense. The diff below now uses the old values in
> case
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 04:28:38AM +0100, Alfonso Sabato Siciliano wrote:
> hello, I am willing to know the sound system of OpenBSD,
> so I started to read the manpages.
> I summarized with a graph below, it is right?
>
Yes this is right. Note that pograms can bypass sndiod seamlessly
and use s
Alfonso Sabato Siciliano wrote:
> hello, I am willing to know the sound system of OpenBSD,
> so I started to read the manpages.
> I summarized with a graph below, it is right?
>
>
I'm not the expert but it seems about right to me.
I think you could draw two additional connections for raw devic
Hi Jason
being the author of GNUstep's batmon and being owner of several laptops
and having developed and tested on them, I have some un-authoritative
information.
Jason Adams wrote:
Upon, pulling the plug from the wall on my older Toshiba Satellite (which has a
new-ish battery)
both xfce4
On 18/12/14 22:38, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-12-17, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask if point-to-point support has been added in ospfd.
I've read this
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136580208222751&w=2
but I cant seem to find relevant entries in the source tree so pro
19 дек. 2014 г. 11:53 полÑзоваÑÐµÐ»Ñ "Jiri B"
напиÑал:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:57:19AM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > I have few 5.5/amd64 in production under CentOS 6.2, without either
direct
> > or indirect access to Internet. No problems so far, no adjustments on
> >
>From 5.5 and up it looks like bgpd macros are broken.
ton...@obc2.rad$ cat bgpd.conf
good="{ 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8 }"
AS 65001
deny from any prefix { $good }
ton...@obc2.rad$
On 5.4:
ton...@obc2.rad$ bgpd -f bgpd.conf
-n
configuration OK
ton...@obc2.rad$
On 5.5:
ton...@obc0.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2014 Dec 19 (Fri) at 08:01:00 + (+), C. L. Martinez wrote:
> :On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :> On 2014 Dec 19 (Fri) at 07:35:28 + (+), C. L. Martinez wrote:
> :> :b) OpenBSD/amd64: set up vio flag
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:57:19AM +0400, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> I have few 5.5/amd64 in production under CentOS 6.2, without either direct
> or indirect access to Internet. No problems so far, no adjustments on
> OpenBSD side.
Time to upgrade hosts? It's time of 6.6 now :)
j.
On 2014 Dec 19 (Fri) at 08:01:00 + (+), C. L. Martinez wrote:
:On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
:> On 2014 Dec 19 (Fri) at 07:35:28 + (+), C. L. Martinez wrote:
:> :b) OpenBSD/amd64: set up vio flags to 0x02
:>
:> The man page for vio(4) says:
:> Setting t
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On 2014 Dec 19 (Fri) at 07:35:28 + (+), C. L. Martinez wrote:
> :b) OpenBSD/amd64: set up vio flags to 0x02
>
> The man page for vio(4) says:
> Setting the bit 0x2 in the flags disables the RingEventIndex feature.
> This can
23 matches
Mail list logo