besides take it back to the store, I mean.
I have it booted on a USB stick. The internal drive appears to be
unpartitioned when I do a disklabel -- only c partition reported. fdisk
does report it as EFI GPT.
I read something about support in the kernel. Is there any hope of say,
constructing a
thanks for the clarifictions.
I will read the FAQs more throroughly in future.
Alex.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:31:34PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote:
I believe FAQ 14.14 may clarify df(1) reporting. Here's a link for
convenience: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#NegSpace
On 20.5.2015. 10:30, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
On 19/05/15(Tue) 22:14, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
Hi all,
today i have update test box from cvs and it seems that netstat doubles
packet count on output. anyone else sees the same thing?
Yep, I introduced a regression during the if_output()
Well, here's my dmesg, in case it's useful:
OpenBSD 5.7 (GENERIC.MP) #881: Sun Mar 8 11:04:17 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 1835790336 (1750MB)
avail mem = 1783062528 (1700MB)
mpath0 at root
scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets
mainbus0
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:10:51PM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote:
Trying to install OpenBSD 5.7-RELEASE amd64 onto a Toshiba Portege M400,
with no success - the bootloader hangs right after printing out fd0 hd0+.
A (very) quick perusal of boot-related manpages doesn't suggest anything I
can do to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Joel Rees joel.r...@gmail.com wrote:
besides take it back to the store, I mean.
I have it booted on a USB stick. The internal drive appears to be
unpartitioned when I do a disklabel -- only c partition reported. fdisk
does report it as EFI GPT.
I read
On 19/05/15(Tue) 22:14, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
Hi all,
today i have update test box from cvs and it seems that netstat doubles
packet count on output. anyone else sees the same thing?
Yep, I introduced a regression during the if_output() conversion. Thanks
for the report, I just committed a
I don't think GNATS is used anymore, so don't mention it. The
entire paragraph is a bit repetitive and could probably be shortened
quite a bit more.
Index: faq/faq2.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq2.html,v
retrieving revision
On 19/05/15 16:29, Marek Czubenko wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for a fiber optic NIC - PCI Express, LX/LC supported by OpenBSD 4.8
or newer.
Could someone recommend me any?
Cheers,
Marek Czubenko
I would suggest any intel that is listed in em(4), ix(4)
G
Hello all,
I was just reviewing the femail-chroot-1.0p0 post-install README, which reads:
# cat /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/femail-chroot-1.0p0 | grep 'By
default' -A2
By default, femail will use `localhost' for smtphost. Make sure to
review FAQ Section 10.16 discussing name resolution
Hi,
it appears I have the same problem as stated here:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/iwm0-fatal-firmware-error-on-current-td267434.html
I am on 5.7 -stable, however, and am very reluctant to go -current.
Could I just patch if_iwm.c to the latest revision and rebuild the
kernel on
On 2015-05-20 10:09, Felipe Scarel wrote:
Hello all,
I was just reviewing the femail-chroot-1.0p0 post-install README, which
reads:
# cat /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/femail-chroot-1.0p0 | grep 'By
default' -A2
By default, femail will use `localhost' for smtphost. Make sure to
review
Felipe Scarel fbsca...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all,
I was just reviewing the femail-chroot-1.0p0 post-install README, which reads:
# cat /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/femail-chroot-1.0p0 | grep 'By
default' -A2
By default, femail will use `localhost' for smtphost. Make sure to
review
It was suggested that I post here to gain the benefit of the collective
brain trust, so here goes... hopefully someone here can lend some guidance.
Thanks in advance for reading this and also for the OpenBSD developers for
their solid product. Thank you for leading me away from the windows
On 05/20/2015 04:13 PM, Armin Tanzarian wrote:
I have a dilemma, I need to add another Intel NIC to my embedded firewall
on a micro atx board. However, I can't seem to find a solution to get
another one in there.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
Azarian!
Does it have to be a NIC or would
Does it have to be a NIC or would VLANs and a smart switch cover your
needs?
- Aner
After great debate, we have settled on adding another nic as the only
option.
So far the only option seems to be a pci express mini ribbon cable to pci
express full size adapter.
Connect the ribbon
Anyone write today on @misc and @tech about this, so I'll ask just to make
sure:
is OpenIKED and/or OpenSMTPD vulnerable to this new Logjam Attack?
This vulnerability allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade vulnerable
TLS
connections to 512-bit export-grade cryptography and [Since]
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Gleydson Soares gsoa...@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Scarel fbsca...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all,
I was just reviewing the femail-chroot-1.0p0 post-install README, which
reads:
# cat /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/femail-chroot-1.0p0 | grep 'By
default' -A2
I think you will find that hibernate doesn’t work with this setup if you try it.
I found this write-up explaining a little better:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20131112031806
Seems double-encrypted swap or dual swap partitions is the way to go if you
want hibernate
to work and
On Wed, 20 May 2015 18:28:10 +0200
Marko Cupać marko.cu...@mimar.rs wrote:
Hi,
it appears I have the same problem as stated here:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/iwm0-fatal-firmware-error-on-current-td267434.html
I am on 5.7 -stable, however, and am very reluctant to go
Oh, I apparently can't do FTP, but that's a recent thing so I'm not
sure. I'm using a cell phone data connection.
On 5/20/15, Alan Corey alan01...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't override it because I didn't know how. I've defined
FETCH_CMD in the environment before but I've never messed with
I didn't override it because I didn't know how. I've defined
FETCH_CMD in the environment before but I've never messed with
mk.conf. I put in literally what you said, but _PROGRESS and
FTP_KEEPALIVE seem to be undefined.
I'm experimenting now using wget but here's a run from trying to
install
On 21 maj 2015, at 00:01, Armin Tanzarian atanzari...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it have to be a NIC or would VLANs and a smart switch cover your
needs?
- Aner
After great debate, we have settled on adding another nic as the only
option.
So far the only option seems to be a
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 11:55:42PM +0200, L.R. D.S. wrote:
Anyone write today on @misc and @tech about this, so I'll ask just to make
sure:
is OpenIKED and/or OpenSMTPD vulnerable to this new Logjam Attack?
This vulnerability allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to downgrade
vulnerable TLS
Hi,
I'm on 2015-May-20 snapshot, running xfce on a laptop which does not
wake from zzz.
dmesg:
OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENERIC.MP) #994: Tue May 19 21:44:56 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real mem = 8246050816 (7864MB)
avail mem = 7992299520
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I appear to have a disk failure of some kind.
softraid0 at root
scsibus4 at softraid0: 256 targets
softraid0: not all chunks were provided; attempting to bring volume 0 online
softraid0: trying to bring up sd3 degraded
sd3 at scsibus4 targ 1 lun
Hello I'm trying to find out if the power consumption relating to the
intel_powerclamp driver (Package Level C-state Idle Injection for
Intel CPUs) was ever fixed. I'm current running 5.7 stable and I find
my cpu is still consuming 6W of power in any state. It was mentioned
in the emails from
27 matches
Mail list logo
