Re: acer travelmate b115-m boot panic
another try with XHCI_DEBUG kernel (otherwise vanilla GENERIC.MP), booted from the usb stick. this gets through the problematic point, the ports are not disabled. i am attaching furter info as well: pcidump -v: Domain /dev/pci0: 0:0:0: Intel Bay Trail Host 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f00 0x0004: Command: 0007 Status: 0x0008: Class: 06 Subclass: 00 Interface: 00 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00 0x0010: BAR empty () 0x0014: BAR empty () 0x0018: BAR empty () 0x001c: BAR empty () 0x0020: BAR empty () 0x0024: BAR empty () 0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1025 Product ID: 0860 0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 0x0038: 0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 00 Line: 00 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00 0:2:0: Intel Bay Trail Video 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f31 0x0004: Command: 0007 Status: 0010 0x0008: Class: 03 Subclass: 00 Interface: 00 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00 0x0010: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0x9000/0x0040 0x0014: BAR empty () 0x0018: BAR mem prefetchable 32bit addr: 0x8000/0x1000 0x001c: BAR empty () 0x0020: BAR io addr: 0x2050/0x0008 0x0024: BAR empty () 0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1025 Product ID: 0860 0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 0x0038: 0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 07 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00 0x00d0: Capability 0x01: Power Management 0x0090: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI) 0x00b0: Capability 0x09: Vendor Specific 0:19:0: Intel Bay Trail AHCI 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f23 0x0004: Command: 0007 Status: 02b0 0x0008: Class: 01 Subclass: 06 Interface: 01 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00 0x0010: BAR io addr: 0x2048/0x0008 0x0014: BAR io addr: 0x205c/0x0004 0x0018: BAR io addr: 0x2040/0x0008 0x001c: BAR io addr: 0x2058/0x0004 0x0020: BAR io addr: 0x2020/0x0020 0x0024: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0x9091d000/0x0800 0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1025 Product ID: 0860 0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 0x0038: 0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 0a Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00 0x0080: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI) 0x0070: Capability 0x01: Power Management 0x00a8: Capability 0x12: SATA 0:20:0: Intel Bay Trail xHCI 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f35 0x0004: Command: 0006 Status: 0290 0x0008: Class: 0c Subclass: 03 Interface: 30 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00 0x0010: BAR mem 64bit addr: 0x9090/0x0001 0x0018: BAR empty () 0x001c: BAR empty () 0x0020: BAR empty () 0x0024: BAR empty () 0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1025 Product ID: 0860 0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 0x0038: 0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 0b Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00 0x0070: Capability 0x01: Power Management 0x0080: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI) 0:26:0: Intel Bay Trail TXE 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f18 0x0004: Command: 0106 Status: 0010 0x0008: Class: 10 Subclass: 80 Interface: 00 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 10 0x0010: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0x9080/0x0010 0x0014: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0x9070/0x0010 0x0018: BAR empty () 0x001c: BAR empty () 0x0020: BAR empty () 0x0024: BAR empty () 0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1025 Product ID: 0860 0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 0x0038: 0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 07 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00 0x0080: Capability 0x01: Power Management 0x00a0: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI) 0:27:0: Intel Bay Trail HD Audio 0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 0f04 0x0004: Command: 0006 Status: 0010 0x0008: Class: 04 Subclass: 03 Interface: 00 Revision: 0e 0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 10 0x0010: BAR mem 64bit addr: 0x9091/0x4000 0x0018: BAR empty ()
Re: Intel i217-LM Ethernet not working in -current
i217-LM Any fix for this in the works?
EHCI/XHCI and USB sound on Thinkpads
Hi misc@ I'm seeing inconsistent USB behaviour between USB2 and USB3 on different Thinkpads running -current with Cambridge Audio DACMagic XS USB audio card (class 2 audio device). This card otherwise works perfectly fine over USB3 on a Mac laptop. - When plugged into a USB2 port on Thinkpad X220 the card is recognised properly: uaudio0 at uhub4 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 CA CA DacMagicXS 1.0 rev 1.00/6.04 addr 3 uaudio: audio rev 1.00 1 mixer controls audio1 at uaudio0 - But when plugged into a USB3 port on X220 (via a usb3 express-card): uhub1: device problem, disabling port 4 - Same error as above on any of the USB3 port on Thinkpad X1 Carbon. There are no other errors that I can see. Any idea where to start debugging this? I'd really like to be able to use this on my X1 Carbon (assumming this is supported?) For reference, dmesg for both laptops: - USB on Thinkpad x220 (builtin usb2, expresscard usb3): ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 6 Series USB rev 0x04: apic 2 int 16 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ... [snip] ... xhci0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 ASMedia ASM1042 xHCI rev 0.00: msi usb1 at xhci0: USB revision 3.0 uhub1 at usb1 ASMedia xHCI root hub rev 3.00/1.00 addr 1 - USB on Thinkpad X1 Carbon (Haswell): xhci0 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 Intel 8 Series xHCI rev 0x04: msi usb0 at xhci0: USB revision 3.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel xHCI root hub rev 3.00/1.00 addr 1 Thanks Bojan
Re: tls with relayd (on 5.7) and key without password
Does not work for me.
#/etc/relayd.conf
relayd_addr=127.0.0.1
relayd_port=8080
prefork 10
http protocol httpfilter {
# Return HTTP/HTML error pages to the client
return error
# Block disallowed sites
match request label URL filtered!
block request quick url www.example.com/ value *
}
http protocol http_tls {
tls tlsv1
tls ca key /etc/ssl/private/ca.key password secret
tls ca cert /etc/ssl/ca.crt
}
relay httpproxy {
# Listen on localhost, accept diverted connections from pf(4)
listen on $relayd_addr port $relayd_port
protocol httpfilter
# Forward to the original target host
forward to destination
}
relay sslproxy {
listen on 127.0.0.1 port 8443 tls
protocol http_tls
transparent forward with tls to destination
}
#EOF
#Error messages
# relayd -d -vv -f /etc/relayd.conf
startup
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca certificate /etc/ssl/ca.crt
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca key /etc/ssl/private/ca.key
/etc/relayd.conf:40: cannot load certificates for relay sslproxy
ca exiting, pid 1218
ca exiting, pid 23391
ca exiting, pid 2336
ca exiting, pid 19464
ca exiting, pid 11404
ca exiting, pid 17412
hce exiting, pid 27069
ca exiting, pid 21514
ca exiting, pid 1904
ca exiting, pid 17808
ca exiting, pid 28847
pfe exiting, pid 818
relay exiting, pid 19581
relay exiting, pid 424
relay exiting, pid 29429
relay exiting, pid 13760
relay exiting, pid 4374
relay exiting, pid 3337
relay exiting, pid 11683
relay exiting, pid 5846
relay exiting, pid 22453
relay exiting, pid 2398
#EOF
2015-05-03 18:51 GMT-03:00 Comète com...@daknet.org:
That works ! Thanks a lot !
3 mai 2015 20:50 mxb a écrit:
Try to
create symlink in /etc/ssl/private.
ln -s mydomain.org
(http://mydomain.org).key 1.2.3.4.key, where “1.2.3.4” is your address in
$ext_addr.
//mxb
On 3 maj 2015, at 13:04, Comète wrote:
Hi,
my
tls key has no password and i already use it for other stuff, so i try to
enable TLS with relayd like this:
http protocol http_tls {
tls tlsv1
tls ca key /etc/ssl/private/mydomain.org.key password
tls ca
cert /etc/ssl/mydomain.org.crt
}
relay transptls {
listen on
$ext_addr port 443 tls
protocol http_tls
transparent forward
with tls to 127.0.0.1 port http
}
but i get this error:
startup
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca certificate /etc/ssl/mydomain.org.crt
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca key /etc/ssl/private/mydomain.org.key
/etc/relayd.conf:24: cannot load certificates for relay transptls
no actions,
nothing to do
ca exiting, pid 29173
pfe exiting, pid 19946
ca exiting, pid
3806
ca exiting, pid 24689
hce exiting, pid 32289
relay exiting, pid 22936
relay exiting, pid 25790
So, is it possible to use a tls key without password
with relayd ?
Thank you
Morgan
--
Antonio Feitosa (http://twitter.com/teebsd)
#Security Consultant, #OpenBSD addicted, #ARM hobbyst and #Blues
#Musician. #P2P is the real #cloudcomputing.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ·
Github: https://github.com/TeeBSD
Blog: http://teebsd.github.io/
wscons, variants and X11
Hi, It seems that there is no X11 configuration needed for a US keyboard layout with Dvorak variant (us.dvorak) if wscons is already set for this layout. Adding a second variant (in this case swapctrlcaps) to config causes X11 to revert to a US layout, though wscons is configured for us.swapctrlcaps.dvorak. Is this to be expected an in such a scenario recommended to revert to setting things up in xorg.conf? Sevan / Venture37
Re: tls with relayd (on 5.7) and key without password
Someone else with that issue?
2015-05-30 17:28 GMT-03:00 Antonio Feitosa antonio@gmail.com:
Does not work for me.
#/etc/relayd.conf
relayd_addr=127.0.0.1
relayd_port=8080
prefork 10
http protocol httpfilter {
# Return HTTP/HTML error pages to the client
return error
# Block disallowed sites
match request label URL filtered!
block request quick url www.example.com/ value *
}
http protocol http_tls {
tls tlsv1
tls ca key /etc/ssl/private/ca.key password secret
tls ca cert /etc/ssl/ca.crt
}
relay httpproxy {
# Listen on localhost, accept diverted connections from pf(4)
listen on $relayd_addr port $relayd_port
protocol httpfilter
# Forward to the original target host
forward to destination
}
relay sslproxy {
listen on 127.0.0.1 port 8443 tls
protocol http_tls
transparent forward with tls to destination
}
#EOF
#Error messages
# relayd -d -vv -f /etc/relayd.conf
startup
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca certificate /etc/ssl/ca.crt
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca key /etc/ssl/private/ca.key
/etc/relayd.conf:40: cannot load certificates for relay sslproxy
ca exiting, pid 1218
ca exiting, pid 23391
ca exiting, pid 2336
ca exiting, pid 19464
ca exiting, pid 11404
ca exiting, pid 17412
hce exiting, pid 27069
ca exiting, pid 21514
ca exiting, pid 1904
ca exiting, pid 17808
ca exiting, pid 28847
pfe exiting, pid 818
relay exiting, pid 19581
relay exiting, pid 424
relay exiting, pid 29429
relay exiting, pid 13760
relay exiting, pid 4374
relay exiting, pid 3337
relay exiting, pid 11683
relay exiting, pid 5846
relay exiting, pid 22453
relay exiting, pid 2398
#EOF
2015-05-03 18:51 GMT-03:00 Comète com...@daknet.org:
That works ! Thanks a lot !
3 mai 2015 20:50 mxb a écrit:
Try to
create symlink in /etc/ssl/private.
ln -s mydomain.org
(http://mydomain.org).key 1.2.3.4.key, where “1.2.3.4” is your address in
$ext_addr.
//mxb
On 3 maj 2015, at 13:04, Comète wrote:
Hi,
my
tls key has no password and i already use it for other stuff, so i try to
enable TLS with relayd like this:
http protocol http_tls {
tls tlsv1
tls ca key /etc/ssl/private/mydomain.org.key password
tls ca
cert /etc/ssl/mydomain.org.crt
}
relay transptls {
listen on
$ext_addr port 443 tls
protocol http_tls
transparent forward
with tls to 127.0.0.1 port http
}
but i get this error:
startup
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca certificate /etc/ssl/mydomain.org.crt
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
socket_rlimit: max open files 1024
relay_load_certfiles: using ca key /etc/ssl/private/mydomain.org.key
/etc/relayd.conf:24: cannot load certificates for relay transptls
no actions,
nothing to do
ca exiting, pid 29173
pfe exiting, pid 19946
ca exiting, pid
3806
ca exiting, pid 24689
hce exiting, pid 32289
relay exiting, pid 22936
relay exiting, pid 25790
So, is it possible to use a tls key without password
with relayd ?
Thank you
Morgan
--
Antonio Feitosa (http://twitter.com/teebsd)
#Security Consultant, #OpenBSD addicted, #ARM hobbyst and #Blues
#Musician. #P2P is the real #cloudcomputing.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ·
Github: https://github.com/TeeBSD
Blog: http://teebsd.github.io/
--
Antonio Feitosa (http://twitter.com/teebsd)
#Security Consultant, #OpenBSD addicted, #ARM hobbyst and #Blues
#Musician. #P2P is the real #cloudcomputing.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ·
Github: https://github.com/TeeBSD
Blog: http://teebsd.github.io/
Re: IBM ThinkPad X60s 1704-5LG flashed with coreboot SeaBIOS
On 29 May 2015 at 11:33, Paul Pereira pjspere...@gmail.com wrote: This is fantastic. Is there a high pitched-noise from the board? I find that with Trisquel, I really needed a tool like powertop to tweak settings in order to make the machine quiet. No, but I have a X61s with a modified BIOS to enable SATA-II with a SSD installed and that emits a high pitched noise when booting. X60s with HDD and coreboot no such noise. Sevan / Venture37
multi-path routing, ifstated, nat issue
Hi all
I'm hoping someone will help me understand and resolve an issue I'm
experiencing while trying to do outbound load-balancing.
Here is the set up:
I have 3 WAN connections:
-em0 (192.168.10.1) is LAN interface.
-em1 (192.168.130.10) (gateway: 192.168.130.1) is satellite interface.
-em2 (192.168.140.10) (gateway: 192.168.140.1) is wifi interface.
-em3 (192.168.120.10) (gateway: 192.168.120.1) is cellular interface.
I've got multi-path routing working on the gateway.
I can start a ping on the gateway and drop any connection and it will just
switch to another one that's up. It's great.
I need to be able to do the same thing for a PC behind the gateway, but I
cannot seem to make that happen.
I'm following http://openbsd.das.ufsc.br/faq/pf/pools.html, the bottom
guide for setting up load balancing outgoing traffic.
My test is pretty simple:
Start ifstated in debug mode with *only* em0 and em3 online.
--
$ sudo ifstated -d
initial state: auto
changing state to auto
running /usr/local/bin/unmetered /dev/null
changing state to cellular-only
running pfctl -a optimal_route -F rules
rules cleared
running echo pass in on em0 from (em0:network) route-to (em3
192.168.120.1) | pfctl -a optimal_route -f -
started
Start pinging from the lan PC behind the gateway and monitor the external
gateway machines for icmp packets with tcpdump.
The em3 logs show these:
21:24:23.547251 192.168.140.10 resolver2.opendns.com: icmp: echo request
21:24:23.564112 resolver2.opendns.com 192.168.140.10: icmp: echo reply
And we are good.
--
Then turn on em2.
ifstated logs:
changing state to auto
running /usr/local/bin/unmetered /dev/null
changing state to cellular-and-wifi
running pfctl -a optimal_route -F rules
rules cleared
running echo pass in on em0 from (em0:network) route-to { (em2
192.168.140.1), (em3 192.168.120.1) } round-robin | pfctl -a optimal_route
-f -
Now both em2 and em3 are available. Traffic is still pinging through the
em3 interface, which is fine - I would expect that.
--
Then turn OFF em3.
ifstated logs:
changing state to auto
running /usr/local/bin/unmetered /dev/null
changing state to wifi-only
running pfctl -a optimal_route -F rules
rules cleared
running echo pass in on em0 from em0:network route-to (em2 192.168.140.1)
| pfctl -a optimal_route -f -
Now here's where the problem comes.
When I turn off the em3 interface, pings do in fact start going through the
em2 interface.
Here is the tcpdump from the gateway on the em3 interface before it went
down:
21:37:17.958682 192.168.140.10 resolver2.opendns.com: icmp: echo request
21:37:17.978438 resolver2.opendns.com 192.168.140.10: icmp: echo reply
Here is the tcpdump from the gateway on the em2 interface after em3 went
down:
21:37:19.530809 192.168.140.10 resolver2.opendns.com: icmp: echo request
21:37:20.541179 192.168.140.10 resolver2.opendns.com: icmp: echo request
As you can see, it started routing traffic out em2, but for whatever reason
it's still trying to NAT the traffic to my em3 interface instead of the em2
interface - which makes the packets not reach the pc behind the gateway.
If I stop the ping session and start it again without making any changes,
it now goes through the em3 and things seem to be working fine.
I'm assuming that I'm doing something ignorant, but I'm not entirely sure
where to look.
Do you have any ideas?
---
/etc/pf.conf
---
lan_net= 192.168.10.0/24
int_if=em0
sat_if=em1
wif_if=em2
cel_if=em3
sat_gw=192.168.130.1
wif_gw=192.168.140.1
cel_gw=192.168.120.1
tcp_services={ 22, 113 }
icmp_types=echoreq
#Options
set block-policy return
#set loginterface egress
set skip on lo
#Block everything by default
block
#FTP Proxy
anchor ftp-proxy/*
pass in quick on $int_if inet proto tcp to any port ftp \
divert-to 127.0.0.1 port 8021
#NATs
match out on $wif_if from $lan_net nat-to ($wif_if)
match out on $sat_if from $lan_net nat-to ($sat_if)
match out on $cel_if from $lan_net nat-to ($cel_if)
#Allow all lan traffic
pass out on $int_if to $lan_net
#Allow from lan to gateway
pass in quick on $int_if from $lan_net to $int_if
#Dynamically load the rules that dictate which route we take.
#Influenced by ifstated
anchor optimal_route
#do our filtering inbound from the lan.
#allow all outbound
pass out on $sat_if
pass out on $wif_if
pass out on $cel_if
#If an IP is from neighbor router networks, send it back through that
interface.
#pass out on { $sat_if $cel_if } from $wif_if route-to ($wif_if $wif_gw)
#pass out on { $wif_if $cel_if } from $sat_if route-to ($sat_if $sat_gw)
#pass out on { $sat_if $wif_if } from $cel_if route-to ($cel_if $cel_gw)
pass out on { $sat_if $cel_if } from ($wif_if:network) route-to ($wif_if
$wif_gw)
pass out on
Re: Softraid question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 So now I'm in recovery mode and it is doing about 1% per hour (it's a 2Tb raid1). Is this normal and can it be speeded up from userland? Thanks, Dhu On Thu, 21 May 2015 04:24:22 -0400 Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote: bioctl sd3 ? j. # bioctl sd3 Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Degraded2000396018176 sd3 RAID1 0 Offline 0 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online 2000396018176 0:1.0 noencl sd1a So you got the answer, full dmesg would show you more... http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#softraid j. - -- https://babayaga.neotext.ca/PublicKeys/Duncan_Patton_a_Campbell_pubkey.txt Ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco. iF4EAREIAAYFAlVqbMsACgkQiY6AzzR1lzzE1gD+Kg3FR0TP0ltEAyFLeTSKfVIS 7K+32qduAWRs0gONcDcA/2CLh0Iq5AURbE1at8RSAfy+l1TV6C4GBj3aEj2r4z9R =rZXw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: spamd - whitelist sender email addresses
On 2015-05-29 Fri 00:09 AM |, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Craig Skinner wrote: RFC 5321, in section 4.5.4.1. Sending Strategy has: From memory, they honour the 4 day rule. I believe so with the possible exception of hotmail as I seem to remember thinking it was typical that microsoft were ignorant of the RFC's and stopped trying after hours. For the last few years, MS has been playing by the rules - for sending. They now honour MX record precedence, pass greylisting in under a day, typically less than an hour: May 26 18:27:55 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:28:06 teak spamd[9945]: new entry 157.55.0.213 from xx...@hotmail.co.uk to commit...@rscds-falkirk.org.uk, helo DUB004-OMC1S14.hotmail.com May 26 18:28:06 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:28:18 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:28:29 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:29:29 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:29:40 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:29:52 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:30:03 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:31:03 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:31:14 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:31:26 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:31:37 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:32:37 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:32:48 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:32:59 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:33:10 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:35:09 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:35:20 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:35:31 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:35:42 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:38:42 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:38:53 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:39:05 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:39:16 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:43:16 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:43:27 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:43:38 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:43:49 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:47:49 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:48:00 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:48:11 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:48:22 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:52:21 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:52:33 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 12 seconds. May 26 18:52:44 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:52:55 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:56:55 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: connected (1/0) May 26 18:57:06 teak spamd[7960]: 157.55.0.213: disconnected after 11 seconds. May 26 18:57:13 teak spamd[21275]: queueing add of 157.55.0.213 May 26 18:57:13 teak spamd[21275]: whitelisting 157.55.0.213 in /var/db/spamd May 26 19:01:18 teak postfix/smtpd[27535]: connect from dub004-omc1s14.hotmail.com[157.55.0.213] May 26 19:01:18 teak spamlogd[29350]: inbound 157.55.0.213 May 26 19:01:18 teak postfix/smtpd[27535]: 3lpvYV3nlNzM1: client=dub004-omc1s14.hotmail.com[157.55.0.213] May 26 19:01:20 teak postfix/smtpd[27535]: disconnect from dub004-omc1s14.hotmail.com[157.55.0.213] May 26 19:06:02 teak postfix/anvil[508]: statistics: max connection rate 1/60s for (smtp:157.55.0.213) at May 26 19:01:18 May 26 19:06:02 teak postfix/anvil[508]: statistics: max connection count 1 for (smtp:157.55.0.213) at May 26 19:01:18 May 26 19:06:02 teak postfix/anvil[508]: statistics: max message rate 1/60s for (smtp:157.55.0.213) at May 26 19:01:18 May 26 19:06:02 teak postfix/anvil[508]: statistics: max recipient rate 1/60s for (smtp:157.55.0.213) at May 26 19:01:18
