Re: ksh not loading .profile

Thanks Todd, same problem with me, solved now.

Re: cwm menu parsing

On 2015-08-05, Erling Westenvik wrote: I've noticed this too for the last snapshots I've been trying, and was planning to check out the sources to see what changes has been commited causing what to me seems to be that the menu now gets alfabetically sorted. I've also noticed this pop up within

mediatomb , limits folda to be seen

Hi all . i installed mediatomb and sqlite with pkg_add . it works well . but all folds is seen by filesystem of mediatomb. i want than /MOVIES only is seen by filesystem of mediatomb . what should i do ? --- tuyosi

Re: SNMP on 5.7/5.8

On 2015/08/05 21:33, Steven Surdock wrote: > Thanks Stuart. It is also my understanding that the base snmpd suffers the > same issue. > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=143143933919367&w=2 > > I will try the debug shortly. snmpd in base is a totally different codebase sharing nothing in

Re: new (nasty) spam pattern

On 05/08/2015 16:40, Seth wrote: (PS: went after one of the main spammers - nice house in New Jersey. We have a rep in the USA... non-violent suggestions for retribution? Jalapeño bean dip under the car door handle always works. There's a thing: I'm currently growing two kinds of chilli: Ja

Re: SNMP on 5.7/5.8

Thanks Stuart. It is also my understanding that the base snmpd suffers the same issue. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=143143933919367&w=2 I will try the debug shortly. -Steve S. > -Original Message- > From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of > St

VRF function in OpenBGPD

claudio@, After reading your inspiring paper Demystifying MPLS: The MPLS framework in OpenBSD, I want to set up a similar network, in which CE and PE exchange prefixes dynamically with eBGP. Essentially I need a VRF function on PE which converts

Re: new (nasty) spam pattern

> Yep, already running greylisting. (I did say I was running spamd.) > > Thanks, Are you using the valid rcpt to check in greyscanner, when tied with disposable addresses, it is very effective atleast with informed users. I have a perl script or two that reads my smtpd configuration files and wor

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

Thanks to everyone for the testing. The patch is now committed.

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

Hi Laurent Thanks, that's it!! I'm not running current-release... I'll guess I have to wait for 5.8 then... Regards, Lysemose On Aug 5, 2015 18:45, "Laurent Salle" wrote: > On 05/08/15 11:58, Heine Lysemose wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm trying to get my autoinstall to autopartition my disk. >> >> My

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

On 05/08/15 11:58, Heine Lysemose wrote: Hi I'm trying to get my autoinstall to autopartition my disk. My system is a VirtualBox server and client with OpenBSD 5.7 Are you running 5.7 current ? I've been bitten myself. Autopartitionning is not available in 5.7 release or stable. You need to

Re: new (nasty) spam pattern

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:07:24 -0700, Steve Fairhead wrote: Meanwhile, my database of sinners really should be "out there" to ... But where? I update it several times a day... You could start your own block list I suppose, but methinks you'd be reinventing the wheel to some extent. (PS: we

Re: cwm menu parsing

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:07:03PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello, > > I am using a recent amd64 snapshot with cwm. I reuse the .cwmrc on > each installation, but for this one things are different. > > I modified the command term section in the past, and the menu entry > [term] was replaced

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:14:35 -0700, Heine Lysemose wrote: Are there any order the questions/answers should appear in, in the file install.conf? I don't know if the email system mangled your install.conf contents, but is the autopartition URL on the same line as the question? As far as I

cwm menu parsing

Hello, I am using a recent amd64 snapshot with cwm. I reuse the .cwmrc on each installation, but for this one things are different. I modified the command term section in the past, and the menu entry [term] was replaced by term and [lock] was not there. For this version, no matter what, [term] a

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

Maybe this is useful? The answer is in the second message of the thread. Code example is included also. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=143402045705775&w=2

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

Correct. On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:08:19PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2015/08/05 10:08, Mark Patruck wrote: > > But i still have a small problem with > > > > em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel I218-V" rev 0x00: msi, address f0:.. > > Thanks for testing. > > "Still" -> just to check

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

Thanks for the input... I checked the log file and I don't see any request for the particular file. I have tried to fest the file manually from the url provided which works as expected. Are there any order the questions/answers should appear in, in the file install.conf? Regards, Lysemose On W

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

On 2015/08/05 10:08, Mark Patruck wrote: > But i still have a small problem with > > em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel I218-V" rev 0x00: msi, address f0:.. Thanks for testing. "Still" -> just to check I understand correctly, this diff doesn't help with your nic, but doesn't make things worse?

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

The em0 is the only ethernet nic on the laptop, this is on a Thinkpad x250 laptop. On 2015 Aug 05 (Wed) at 13:23:13 +0200 (+0200), Mark Patruck wrote: :Hmm..weird. Is the I218-LM the only nic in your system? Because if :i add an additional PCIe Intel 85247L, my onboard I218-V comes up :with 1000b

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

Hmm..weird. Is the I218-LM the only nic in your system? Because if i add an additional PCIe Intel 85247L, my onboard I218-V comes up with 1000baseT as well. em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82574L" rev 0x00: msi, address 00:.. em1 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel I218-V" rev 0x00: msi, address

Re: Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 11:58:55AM +0200, Heine Lysemose wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get my autoinstall to autopartition my disk. > > My system is a VirtualBox server and client with OpenBSD 5.7 > > So far I can boot from PXE it runs through the autoinstall just fine but > fails to do the auto

Re: Patch for CVE-2015-5477 available?

Gah. Sorry guys. Ignore. Patch is available at the end of below link. On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Dennis Kramer (DT) wrote: Hi folks! Does anyone know if there's a patch available for CVE-2015-5477 (https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272) for OpenBSD 5.6 (BIND 9.4.2-P2) ? Thanks in advance. Grt,

Re: Patch for CVE-2015-5477 available?

http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/net/isc-bind/Makefile On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 12:41:24PM +0200, Dennis Kramer (DT) wrote: > Hi folks! > > Does anyone know if there's a patch available for CVE-2015-5477 > (https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272) for OpenBSD 5.6 (BIND 9.4.2-P2) ? > > T

Patch for CVE-2015-5477 available?

Hi folks! Does anyone know if there's a patch available for CVE-2015-5477 (https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01272) for OpenBSD 5.6 (BIND 9.4.2-P2) ? Thanks in advance. Grt,

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

On 2015 Aug 05 (Wed) at 10:08:05 +0200 (+0200), Mark Patruck wrote: :No issues on systems running : :em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:.. :em1 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:.. : :Also working on : :em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "In

Autopartitioning with PXE and autoinstall

Hi I'm trying to get my autoinstall to autopartition my disk. My system is a VirtualBox server and client with OpenBSD 5.7 So far I can boot from PXE it runs through the autoinstall just fine but fails to do the autopartitioning and therefore creates a default layout of the disk. Here my files

Re: SNMP on 5.7/5.8

On 2015-08-04, Steven Surdock wrote: > The broken SNMP on i386/5.7 is preventing me from upgrading. I tried > i386/5.8 but I'm still seeing net-snmpd crash with the following error. > >NET-SNMP version 5.7.3 >Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4 >Error ex

Re: Possible fix for i217 problem

No issues on systems running em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:.. em1 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03: msi, address 0c:.. Also working on em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82576" rev 0x01: msi, address 90:.. em1 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "Intel

Re: snmp HC on i386

Steven Surdock engineered-net.com> writes: > > Just noticed that I'm having the same issue on 5.7/i386 > > NET-SNMP version 5.7.3 > Error expanding HCInReceives to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4 > Error expanding HCInDelivers to 64bits in ipSystemStatsTable.ipv4 > Error expanding HCOutReques