In spamd.8, it shows:
BLACKLIST-ONLY MODE
[...]
table spamd persist
pass in on egress proto tcp from spamd to any port smtp \
divert-to 127.0.0.1 port spamd
However, it appears pf requires inet when diverting to a table[1]:
pass in on egress inet proto tcp from spamd to any port smtp \
I'm currently seeing 32M of memory used on my amd64 system. 20M of it
is the feed itself. CPU usage is minor. Disk use is only the trapped
list, which is currently at 1.1M on disk.
Hope this helps.
On 2015 Aug 10 (Mon) at 15:15:42 -0600 (-0600), Devin Reade wrote:
:In general terms, what
I'm trying to set up nonblocking writes to /dev/audio from within perl.
It won't let me:
$ cat ft.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use Fcntl;
my $fh_out;
my $outfile=/dev/audio;
my $flags;
open($fh_out, , $outfile) or die(open $outfile: $!);
$flags=fcntl($fh_out, F_GETFL, 0) or
Hi Claudio,
Thank you so much for the info. To run multiple bgdp instances, do I need to
use different listening port numbers?
Regards,
-yang
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of
Claudio Jeker
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:23:01AM +0200, Marko Cupa? wrote:
Hi,
I'm on 2015-May-20 snapshot, running xfce on a laptop which does not
wake from zzz.
Catching up on old emails -
Please try a new snapshot since things have changed a bit since May.
If this is still a problem, you'll need to
Assaf Gordon assafgordon at gmail.com writes:
Hello,
On OpenBSD-5.7/amd64 (under qemu/kvm), I'm getting incorrect results
when using ceill(3). For values between 0 and 1, the returned value
is 0, while I'd expected it to be 1. Using ceil(3) does return 1 as
expected. Is this my incorrect
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 10:07:31AM +0200, L?VAI D?niel wrote:
On sze, aug 05, 2015 at 06:49:42 +, David Dahlberg wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 05.08.2015, 00:31 +0100 schrieb Jason McIntyre:
if this were the case, i'd say we want:
[tls [verify]]
Hmm, I think I have heard this
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:15:42 -0700, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
(I don't see any dedicated mailing list on the bgp-spamd.net web page,
so hopefully this is an appropriate place to ask.)
There's a mailing list, but it think it's had about one message posted so
far.
8 matches
Mail list logo
