On 2016-02-15 10:15, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
..
I think it got reverted by:
..
but I'm not an expert so would wait on confirmation by Bob Beck.
Yes, I think you are correct, and it was indeed reverted.
..
But it looks like the functions that were introduced in the above
commit are st
On 02/13/16 11:49, Tinker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1)
> http://www.openbsd.org/papers/asiabsdcon2010_softraid/softraid.pdf page
> 3 "2.2 RAID 1" says that it reads "on a round-robin basis from all
> active chunks", i.e. read operations are spread evenly across disks.
>
> Since then did anyone implement
On 14 February 2016 at 10:29, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>> There was this commit, I don't *think* it got reverted.
>>
>>
>>
>> CVSROOT:/cvs
>> Module name:src
>> Changes by: b...@cvs.openbsd.org2013/06/11 13:01:20
>>
>> M
On 2016-02-12, Daniel Boyd wrote:
> I am having this same issue. I also tried adding the -d switch
> to see if that would shed any light.
>
> $ sshfs -d -o idmap=user ...
> command-line line 0: Bad number.
> remote host has disconnected
>
> $ sshfs -d -o idmap=file,uidfile=myuidfile,gidfile=mygid
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.misc/202642 -- and a lot
of other references which google may throw on your head if you search
for stack/stacking of softraid openbsd.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Tinker wrote:
> Dear Karel,
>
> Are you saying that softraids not can be sandwhiched
On 2016-02-13, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 12/02/16 18:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2016-02-12, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a carped firewall which is using dhcrelay to forward dhcp
>>> requests to another carped dhcp server.
>>> After upgrade to Feb 4 snapshot I'm
Dear Karel,
Are you saying that softraids not can be sandwhiched as of today -
If they can't, about what kind of complexity needs to be solved?
Thanks,
Tinker
On 2016-01-31 19:06, Karel Gardas wrote:
[..]
If you are interested in softraid, then perhaps some funding of fixes
which would allow
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> There was this commit, I don't *think* it got reverted.
>
>
>
> CVSROOT:/cvs
> Module name:src
> Changes by: b...@cvs.openbsd.org2013/06/11 13:01:20
>
> Modified files:
> sys/kern : kern_sysctl.c spec_vnop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
last information I have about spamd with IPv6 support is WIP.
Is there any code I could try? Maybe I can help, at least in
running tests?
Please mail
Harri
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWwJVyAAoJEAqeKp5m04HLJxMH/jF6nBeBn0gYe5HQj73vDgWL
utLHaxkD1ODydZgQ
0
C Philippines
P National Capital Region
T Makati City
Z 1203
O OpenBSD Philippines
I Onofre L. Alvarado, Jr.
A 8400 Mayapis st., Bgy. San Antonio
M i...@openbsd.org.ph
U http://www.openbsd.org.ph/
B 63-2-7281903
X 63-2-7281903
N Over a decade and a half's experience in the use and deployment of O
On 2016-02-14 19:20, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:56:16AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> UFS.
>
> (Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhe
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 06:56:16AM -0500, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
>
> > Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> > UFS.
> >
> > (Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhere in there.
> >
> > The bufcache
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Tinker wrote:
> Did two tests, one with async and one with softdep, on amd64, 5.9-CURRENT,
> UFS.
>
> (Checked "dd"'s sources and there is no fsync() anywhere in there.
>
> The bufcache setting was 90, 3GB free RAM, pushed 2GB of data using "dd"
> to disk.
>
Base
13 matches
Mail list logo
