Re: How to tune network on Qemu-system-i386

Does hardware accelerated Qemu work on OpenBSD now? It didn't at the end of 2014. Thanks, SteveT On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:38:48 +0500 "dmitry.sensei" wrote: > It works :) If i added ifconfig tap0 > However I have not yet understand how :) > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

Hi Gareth, Yes, I too understand the frustration with trolls who come on a software's mailing list unflatteringly comparing it to an alternative. That's just troll crap. But I'm not fond of the phrase "GNU/Linux douche bags". Does being a credible BSD guy require a litmus test of repudiating

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > Anyway, just some musings. Is there anyone else out there using > lpr/lpd/lprm from base? Maybe I'm the only one? I've been using the lp* tools for many years for personal printing, first using a

elite smtpd control

i caught this in a process listing, and did a double take. $ ps ax|grep control 31337 ?? I 0:00.09 smtpd: control (smtpd) $ ps auxw|grep control _smtpd 31337 0.0 0.0 1592 4 ?? I 21Jan160:00.09 smtpd: control (smtpd) i thought it was interesting enough to share given the

Re: How to tune network on Qemu-system-i386

It works :) If i added ifconfig tap0 However I have not yet understand how :) On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM, John Long wrote: > Dmitry, > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:06:34AM +0500, dmitry.sensei wrote: > >> Can you give generic guide to setting up a network in Qemu

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

Thus said Tobias Ulmer on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:51:28 +0100: > No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. But it does work (at least in some configurations). To enable my PostScript printers, all I have to do is add a single line to /etc/printcap... well, maybe 2 lines. printer:\

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 09:10 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote: > Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman > > Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lists to spread the gospel of OpenBSD! ^^

Re: startx vs xdm

If you call the file .Xdefaults it will be used in both scenarios described, with no need for the `xrdb` command. On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 at 08:47 Jiri B wrote: > XDM fires up /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, easy to read. One can even > customize XDM and all other things in

Re: current status of octeon support

Holger Glaess [gla...@glaessixs.de] wrote: > hi > > can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ? > > is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ? Yes although there may be more speed optimization possible

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

> Eric Furman wrote on Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:23:27PM -0500: > > > OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating system. > > VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their operating system. > > Hell, even Windows people don't come on this list and discuss their OS. > >

Re: Firefox W^X isn't a part of Pwn2Own contest

David Coppa gmail.com> writes: > Il 17/feb/2016 14:52, "Lampshade" poczta.fm> ha scritto: > > > > Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows > > have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't. > > Not until Firefox 46. It *is* already in Nightly builds (but too hard for big guys to cope

current status of octeon support

hi can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ? is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ? thanks holger

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote: > After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is > significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of > consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike > laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high

Re: client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 OpenBSD 5.1

Motty Cruz writes: > I see the following error in my firewall log: > client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 (this > IP is on the firewall interface facing the public) > proxy cannot connect to server xx.xxx.x.48: No route to host Looks like a log

Re: Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote: > > The only thing wrong with lpd is nobody tedu'ed it yet. > > No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. If you want to write a new > print job queueing system, sure, have fun. Maybe you can come up with a > 'cups' that doesn't suck?

Re: how to Bridging with a wireless NIC

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0900, Tuyosi Takesima wrote: >> wifi router >> 192.168.100.254 >> | >> |wireless >> | >> rum0:dhcpcd > > This kind of bridge between two wireless devices requires support for > the WDS

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

On 17 February 2016 at 04:23, Eric Furman wrote: > I'm totally confused as to why we constantly get GNU/Linux douche bags > on this list wanting to talk about GNU/Linux. > To get equal time to teach the controversy?

client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 OpenBSD 5.1

I see the following error in my firewall log: client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 (this IP is on the firewall interface facing the public) proxy cannot connect to server xx.xxx.x.48: No route to host Thanks, _Motty

Industrial use of line printers, does/would your company/organization use them with our lpd?

After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high reliability. Is anyone using these in a high volume output setting

Re: how to Bridging with a wireless NIC

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0900, Tuyosi Takesima wrote: > wifi router > 192.168.100.254 > | > |wireless > | > rum0:dhcpcd This kind of bridge between two wireless devices requires support for the WDS ("wireless distribution system") extension for both the wifi router and rum0.

Re: Firefox W^X isn't a part of Pwn2Own contest

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Lampshade wrote: > Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows > have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't. > I run browsers on the other user account in OpenBSD. Do you also sandbox the browser with some sort of remote desktop, or run under a

Re: Firefox W^X isn't a part of Pwn2Own contest

Il 17/feb/2016 14:52, "Lampshade" ha scritto: > > Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows > have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't. Not until Firefox 46.

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

I'm also a big GNU/Linux fan, but I can understand the frustration of people who constantly give credit to others for their work. The GNU project did not inspire BSD. On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500 > Eric

FAQ - Add a link

Hi, Can you add a link to "http://www.openbsd.org; on the OpenBSD logo (smalltitle.gif) located at http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ ? It will be better for browsing, to come back. Thank you very much. Regards, Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY www.openbsdjumpstart.org

Firefox W^X isn't a part of Pwn2Own contest

Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't. I run browsers on the other user account in OpenBSD.

Firefox W^X isn't a part of Pwn2Own contest

Made my day. http://www.eweek.com/security/pwn2own-hacking-contest-returns-as-joint-hpe- trend-micro-effort.html Quote: One change in the 2016 event is that the Mozilla Firefox Web browser is no longer part of the contest. "We wanted to focus on the browsers that have made serious security

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:09:01AM -0700, Jorge Luis wrote: > Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free > software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU > activists helped persuade them? No. BSD predates the GNU project. > If no, what is

Re: OpenBSD 5.8 ikev2 road warrior setup with various clients

On 16/02/2016 11:59 πμ, George Mamalakis wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to configure an ikev2 VPN gateway on my OpenBSD 5.8 box to allow remote access to my local network from various, road-warrior client "types" (MS Windows, Linux's, BSD's). My example local network is 10.0.0.0/24 and my public

Re: PPPoE / isakmpd race

On 2016/02/16 20:04, Christopher Snell wrote: > Yes, the Listen-on is static.  Unfortunately, changing the 0.0.0.0 in > hostname.pppoe0 breaks PPPoE. That will be ISP-dependent then, you can definitely hardcode it with some providers. > I think I could work around this in netstart by simply

Re: pf, bridge and vether: interface with no group

On 2016-02-16 16:34, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:05:51 +0100, > Clemens Goessnitzer a écrit : > > Ok I think : > > the pf.conf rule > ### rules for internal network ### > pass inet proto { tcp, udp } from internal:network to port

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

2016-02-17 7:43 GMT+01:00 Steve Litt : > > As a GNU/Linux douche bag, I'm wondering why the strong reaction? Has > somebody hit a nerve? I thought this discussion was just bumbling along > til you made it a big thing(tm). > GNU or Linux are no subject of discussion on

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

On 2016 Feb 17 (Wed) at 01:43:29 -0500 (-0500), Steve Litt wrote: :On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500 :Eric Furman wrote: : :> OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating :> system. VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their :> operating

Re: Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU activists helped persuade them?

On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500 Eric Furman wrote: > OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating > system. VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their > operating system. Hell, even Windows people don't come on this list > and discuss