Re: Quick APU2 review

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Eric Furman wrote: > These requests for 'Real World' numbers are almost always > stupid, because the people asking are almost certain to never > need the max amount of bandwidth even a modest machine > can supply. Really? Are you actually

Re: Quick APU2 review

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 08:26 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016-04-15, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > >> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck. > >> > >> You are off topic. > > > > Sorry Theo, > > > > He asked for > > > > "real world through put?" >

remove password advice in afterboot.8 and passwd.1

Stop giving password advice. Instead, make a general statement about password strength in passwd.1. Rob Index: afterboot.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/afterboot.8,v retrieving revision 1.153 diff -u -p -r1.153 afterboot.8

Re: man pages diff

> From: "Alexander Hall" > To: "Jason McIntyre" , "misc" > Cc: "Ingo Schwarze" > Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 4:15:10 AM > Subject: Re: man pages diff > On April 7, 2016 10:40:24 PM GMT+02:00, Jason McIntyre

Re: Quick APU2 review

On 2016-04-15, Daniel Ouellet wrote: >> That's nice. I don't have a ferrari, I have a rather basic truck. >> >> You are off topic. > > Sorry Theo, > > He asked for > > "real world through put?" > > I provided some to be helpful. >From a different machine though. Compared

Re: Quick APU2 review

On 2016-04-15, Heine Lysemose wrote: > Can you give some real world through put? How much can you push through it > from a NAT’et device? And what is the device stats when doing so? This depends on several things. IPsec or not (and how is it configured). pppoe or routing or

Re: Upgrade to 5.9 full disk encryption

 J o ‎l Sent from my Phone.   Original Message   From: Predrag Punosevap ‎ Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 09:11 To: erling.westen...@gmail.com Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade to 5.m. J9 full disk encryption Erling Westenvik wrote: Tn. I‎ > On Sat,

Re: jabber client with conference history saving

On 17 Apr 2016, Joseph Oficre wrote: > Can someone give me an advice about xmpp client on OpenBSD, Im using Psi > for now, but it doesnt save messages history properly (errors only). > So i want to try another one. > Doesnt matter if console or gui, just with chatroom/private chats history >

Re: jabber client with conference history saving

Le 2016-04-17 21:42, Joseph Oficre a écrit : Hello, @misc. Can someone give me an advice about xmpp client on OpenBSD, Im using Psi for now, but it doesnt save messages history properly (errors only). So i want to try another one. Doesnt matter if console or gui, just with chatroom/private

jabber client with conference history saving

Hello, @misc. Can someone give me an advice about xmpp client on OpenBSD, Im using Psi for now, but it doesnt save messages history properly (errors only). So i want to try another one. Doesnt matter if console or gui, just with chatroom/private chats history saving ability. OpenBSD-current.

Re: library-specs(7) erratum

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 01:44:27AM -0600, Bob NW8L wrote: > Hello, > > Now that architectures without shared libraries aren't supported [1], > shouldn't the reference to them should be removed from library-specs(7)? > fixed, thanks. jmc > Index: library-specs.7 >

Re: new

Hi, Tito Mari Francis Escano wrote on Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 11:28:29PM +0800: > 0 > C Philippines > P National Capital Region > T Taguig City > Z 1633 > O EDGEKIT Computer Systems > I Tito Mari Francis H. Escano > A Block 1 Lot 24 Zone 1 Central Bicutan > M titomarifran...@edgekit.com > U

Re: smtpd : reject with a message

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 06:14:36PM +, Peter Fraser wrote: > Is there any method of added extra information when rejecting an email with > smtpd > > I am looking for an equivalent effect to the .REDIRECT or error message in > sendmail's virtualusertable > > for example I had the following in

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

> hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: > a) SMP of network stack/pf. > b) a modern file system like ZFS or Hammer. Yay! I just won a bet (from a friend of mine) that this was going to turn into a troll. Thanks for the confirmation, dude! (My friend is not happy with you,

[patch] bgpctl more info in terse format

Hello, When monitoring my bgpd, I need to check the session duration and the number of prefixes. Here is a patch that add these informations to "bgpctl show sum terse" Before : # bgpctl show sum terse 10.20.30.254 65003 Established After : # bgpctl show sum terse 10.20.30.254 65003 Established

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

> So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ? You can write the code for SMP, test and compile it at home, then send it to the project for commit. The other way is sponsor someone to write it. > hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: > a) SMP of network

Re: amd5.9 mp softdep bufcachepercent

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:43:27AM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > I rm -rf /usr/ports on the newly upgraded laptop running generic 5.9 amd > MP kernel. /usr is mounted with the option softdep. It took ages for rm > to finish. Laptop has 4GB of RAM. The HDD is SSD with the capacity 931 > GB and

Re: assigning ipv6 addresses to interfaces

Stuart Henderson @ 2016-02-01T11:44:49 +0100: > On 2016-02-01, LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > Interesting. I even tried to specifically request a prefix with > > ia_pd 1/::/64 [...] > > ... but alas it didn't make any difference. > > > > Could it be that this is the error of

Re: diff for help.1

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 07:42:05PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:16:59PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote: > > Recent FAQ cleanup lost a reference to mg(1) (section 2.2). > > > > Text editors seem fundamental enough to include in help.1. > > > > While here, make consistent use of

Re: Upgrade to 5.9 full disk encryption

Erling Westenvik wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 11:02:36PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > > Bryan Everly wrote: > > > > > > Boot the installer. Exit to the shell. Then do: > > > > > > bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 > > > > > > > Unless I did something

Re: owncloud - external files directory

It sounds really nice, ill try, thank you a lot! 2016-04-17 15:07 GMT+03:00 Erling Westenvik : > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 02:20:23PM +0300, Joseph Oficre wrote: > > I want to store all my files centralized. I have some windows pc's at > home, > > some notebooks and my

Re: scanner HP scanjet4370 not working

On 2016-04-17 13:03, EdaSky wrote: I have scanner HP scanjet4370 tested on 5.8 RELEASE and 5.9 GENERIC.MP#1690 i386 with the same result scanner is detected $ dmesg OpenBSD 5.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1690: Thu Mar 31 09:41:46 MDT 2016

Re: owncloud - external files directory

On 04/17/16 13:20, Joseph Oficre wrote: > I want to store all my files centralized. I have some windows pc's at home, > some notebooks and my work laptop. So i want to be able to put and take the > files from any of this PC's. But /var/ partition only 100gb size, so i > think it's good idea to

Re: owncloud - external files directory

El Sun, 17 Apr 2016 14:20:23 +0300, Joseph Oficre escribió: > I want to store all my files centralized. I have some windows pc's at > home, > some notebooks and my work laptop. So i want to be able to put and take > the files from any of this PC's. But /var/ partition only 100gb size, so > i

Re: owncloud - external files directory

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 02:20:23PM +0300, Joseph Oficre wrote: > I want to store all my files centralized. I have some windows pc's at home, > some notebooks and my work laptop. So i want to be able to put and take the > files from any of this PC's. But /var/ partition only 100gb size, so i >

Re: Upgrade to 5.9 full disk encryption

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 11:02:36PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Bryan Everly wrote: > > > > Boot the installer. Exit to the shell. Then do: > > > > bioctl -c C -l /dev/sd0a softraid0 > > > > Unless I did something really stupid I would swear that I upgraded fully > encrypted laptop running

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: a) SMP of network stack/pf. b) a modern file system like ZFS or Hammer. -- View this message in context: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095p294143.html Sent from the openbsd user - misc

scanner HP scanjet4370 not working

I have scanner HP scanjet4370 tested on 5.8 RELEASE and 5.9 GENERIC.MP#1690 i386 with the same result scanner is detected $ dmesg OpenBSD 5.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1690: Thu Mar 31 09:41:46 MDT 2016 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Genuine Intel(R)

Re: owncloud - external files directory

I want to store all my files centralized. I have some windows pc's at home, some notebooks and my work laptop. So i want to be able to put and take the files from any of this PC's. But /var/ partition only 100gb size, so i think it's good idea to move datadir to /home/ partition(or even to

Re: owncloud - external files directory

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:40:59PM +0300, Joseph Oficre wrote: > Hello misc. > I've installed ownCloud with this guide > https://github.com/reyk/httpd/wiki/Running-ownCloud-with-httpd-on-OpenBSD > > Everything looks fine, but i want to store all my files not in > /var/www/owncloud/data but in

owncloud - external files directory

Hello misc. I've installed ownCloud with this guide https://github.com/reyk/httpd/wiki/Running-ownCloud-with-httpd-on-OpenBSD Everything looks fine, but i want to store all my files not in /var/www/owncloud/data but in /home/USER/owncloud/data/ Moving datadir to home and reconfiguring

Re: Odd (incorrect?) zsh output

On Sun, 17 Apr 2016, Geoff Wozniak wrote: > # zsh -c 'x=$(false); echo $?' > 0 Same thing here, same arch/release, different hardware: > $ uname -mr > 5.9 amd64 > $ sysctl hw.vendor hw.product > hw.vendor=Dell Inc. > hw.product=PowerEdge T20 > $ zsh -c 'x=$(false); echo

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:10 AM, bluesun08 wrote: > beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i > use pf. > I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher > than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of