Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:07:14 +1000
> Irony mode ACTIVATE.
Exactly: ignore this entire mediocre thread, search the archive instead.
Howard, find three followup Q:s below (3-5), thanks
On 2016-06-13 05:07, Howard Chu wrote:
Tinker wrote:
Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
Not sure what action you're expecting from us. Theo made it quite
clear that OpenBSD does not and will not have a unified buffer
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:25:17 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> ... until you meet the quality expectations.
Irony mode ACTIVATE.
> > Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > > Compiled for myself and the archives:
> >
> > For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> >
> > > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
> >
> > You're in for a LOT of disappointment
If you can't read the question properly, please remain silent.
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:21:48 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality
> threads.
...
> You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
> without dmesg and
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, wrote:
> Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> > Compiled for myself and the archives:
>
> For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
>
> > < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
>
>
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:48:33 +0200 ropers
> Compiled for myself and the archives:
For you only, the archives deserve much better: higher quality threads.
> < Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
You're in for a LOT of disappointment if you follow marketing material
Tinker wrote:
Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
Not sure what action you're expecting from us. Theo made it quite clear that
OpenBSD does not and will not have a unified buffer cache.
OpenBSD should deliver LMDB in the MDB_WRITEMAP mode.
Compiled for myself and the archives:
< Fanless OpenBSD-capable (probably) laptops >
Some of these specs/prices highly uncertain/unreliable/subject to change.
Interface abundance decreases from top to bottom.
Toughbooks don't seem to have built-in mics, which may be a plus for the
practical
I've been playing with the Lanner FW7525 - It's a Nice piece of Kit. Can
be had for just under 400$ Depends on what your purposes are - but for
Firewall appliance it's pretty hard to beat at the moment.
On 12 June 2016 at 14:25, wrote:
> There's some reports of
There's some reports of Minnowboard Max working with OpenBSD:
http://web.archive.org/web/20150705061723/http://countersiege.com/2015/02/22/minnowboard_max_openbsd.html
On 2016.06.12, Dan L??dtke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there an OpenBSD-compatible SBC (Singe Board Computer) that comes close to
> raspberryPi size-wise? I saw some x86-based SBCs on kickstarter a while ago,
> but lost track of the projects and their OpenBSD compatibility.
>
> I know so far:
> -
Hi,
is there an OpenBSD-compatible SBC (Singe Board Computer) that comes close to
raspberryPi size-wise? I saw some x86-based SBCs on kickstarter a while ago,
but lost track of the projects and their OpenBSD compatibility.
I know so far:
- soekris
- pcengines
More?
Bonus points for working
Hi Howard,
Any plan on making LMDB work on OpenBSD?
OpenBSD should deliver LMDB in the MDB_WRITEMAP mode.
(http://lmdb.tech/doc/group__mdb.html)
(At least some effort has been done e.g.
https://gitlab.com/mdb/sqlightning/issues/6 )
Thanks,
Tinker
> Wrant. Really appreciate it.
Just ignore it, you can't let an isolated response taint your view of the
mailing list! I wish I could help you, but I don't know an answer to your
question.
Thanks for all the private personal attacks and abusive messages such
as this one, Wrant. Really appreciate it.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 13:46:47 +0300
li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Shithead. Get lost. You're on auto-delete. You don't exist.
Took the same path - updated to the latest snapshot and could no longer
access hidden services, while clearnet routing worked just fine. I also
route all the traffic through tor transparently.
In my case though there was no time jitter but it turned out that
the 127/8 -> 127.0.0.1 route got
Allow me to explain that complex thought.
I didn't say that all machines are useless, nor did I say that any
machine is useless. One machine that is useful for Purpose #1 is
useless for Purpose #2; likewise, the machine that works well for
Purpose #2 is quite possibly useless for Purpose #1.
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 11:07:24 +1000
> On the other hand, those types of machines are useless for high-end
> video editing, which may be what a "desktop" is to you.
That's one very complex thought, hold it, keep still, don't move an inch.
No machine is useless, it's the
Okay, I understand. It was just that, from my point of view, they were not all
independent to each other, and sending one email for every single questions did
not seem appropriate to me.
I did search the mailing list archive. But it was not that clear for me. That's
why I thought I could
20 matches
Mail list logo