Re: Laptop Recommendations?

I'm not sure if anything new is a good choice, particularly because of a lack of current GPU / WiFi drivers. I usually pick up something about a year or two old on refurb \ second hand market. Dell's business line (latitude / precision) have treated me well in the past. Just stick with Intel or

Re: usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

> On Nov 9, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Jan Kalkus wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? >> >> I'm running -current (7th november snapshot) 64bit, sample pf >> configurations follow with two different configuration attempts. >> Both print the

Laptop Recommendations?

Greetings Fair BSD Wizards, I am new to the lists. I am currently shopping for a new Xmas present for myself and am looking for a laptop that's portable and lightweight. Preferably fast, cheap (close to free), light, and secure. If you have any recommendations before the stormy winter hits the

Re: usage of pf overload table option inside anchors

> Hi, > > How does one use the overload state option inside an anchor? > > I'm running -current (7th november snapshot) 64bit, sample pf > configurations follow with two different configuration attempts. > Both print the following warning: > > pfctl: warning: namespace collision with global

Re: Dell R930 server

>What about my questions ? the work can be done by someone with technical skills who has the hardware and the need to do it.

Re: Dell R930 server

the only question I see is the question about the questions. -l On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Friedrich Locke wrote: > What about my questions ? > > Thanks.

Dell R930 server

What about my questions ? Thanks.

using httpd's pattern support?

Hi, I'm writing a book on OpenBSD's web stack. If you're using httpd's Lua pattern support ('location match' or 'server match'), I'd be interested in hearing what you're using it for. I'm collecting use cases. If you can share snippets of httpd.conf, that would be VERY helpful. Please reply

Re: Dell R930 server

"Nobody in their right mind would use OpenBSD for that." That's how literally all of the projects I've used OpenBSD for have started. On Nov 9, 2016 2:39 AM, "Martin Schröder" wrote: > 2016-11-09 9:06 GMT+01:00 ludovic coues : > > I would say big data. > >

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:13:47PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Taking in care /etc/rc.d/dkimproxy_out flags: > > daemon_flags="--conf_file=/etc/dkimproxy_out.conf --user=_dkimproxy > --group=_dkimproxy" > > These files should be owned by _dkimproxy user and group. > It worked!

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 11:57:18AM -0500, trondd wrote: > Should also be in the maillog. Hey, I think I found the problem: Nov 9 10:37:12 server dkimproxy.out[38514]: signing error: Error: cannot read /var/dkimproxy/default.private: Permission denied The permissions are: # ls -l

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

trondd, Your response was also useful to me in another more important way. I took a look to the headers of your message and I observe gmail says your dkim is correct: Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kagu-tsuchi.com; However, I had to rescue your message from

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

On Wed, November 9, 2016 11:39 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0500, trondd wrote: >> On Wed, November 9, 2016 9:14 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > >> > First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress? >> > >> > If it's not, then

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 09:27:58AM -0500, trondd wrote: > On Wed, November 9, 2016 9:14 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress? > > > > If it's not, then the long one. I've tried something similar to > > the example in

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

On 2016-11-09, "Comète" wrote: > I've made some bandwidth tests (on 6.0 stable - amd64) between two APU2C > boxes connected with an Ethernet cable and an IPSEC VPN using IKEDv2. I get a > maximum bandwidth of 66 Avg Mbps when IPSEC is enable which is, I think, very > low for

Re: low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

On 2016-11-09, =?utf-8?B?Q29tw6h0ZQ==?= wrote: > Hi, > > I've made some bandwidth tests (on 6.0 stable - amd64) between two APU2C > boxes connected with an Ethernet cable and an IPSEC VPN using IKEDv2. I get a > maximum bandwidth of 66 Avg Mbps when IPSEC is enable which is, I

Re: dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

On Wed, November 9, 2016 9:14 am, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Hi everyone, > > First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress? > > If it's not, then the long one. I've tried something similar to > the example in smtpd.conf(5). Outgoing messages don't get signed. > > > # dkim-genkey -s

dkimproxy_out doesn't sign my outgoing messages

Hi everyone, First of all, is dkimproxy a work in progress? If it's not, then the long one. I've tried something similar to the example in smtpd.conf(5). Outgoing messages don't get signed. # dkim-genkey -s default -d mydomain.com -r -D /var/dkimproxy /etc/dkimproxy_out.conf

Re: Wrong Guest OS type in VMware ESXi 5.5.0.3568722

On 11/09/16 03:24, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:57:29PM +0300, Alexei Malinin wrote: >>> Synopsis: Wrong Guest OS type in VMware ESXi 5.5.0.3568722 >>> Description: >> OpenBSD kernel reports wrong Guest OS type to VMware ESXi. >>> Fix: >> Maybe somewhere in

low bandwidth results with IPSEC enabled between two PC Engines APU2C2

Hi, I've made some bandwidth tests (on 6.0 stable - amd64) between two APU2C boxes connected with an Ethernet cable and an IPSEC VPN using IKEDv2. I get a maximum bandwidth of 66 Avg Mbps when IPSEC is enable which is, I think, very low for an AES-NI enabled processor. And about 30 seconds after

Re: Dell R930 server

2016-11-09 9:06 GMT+01:00 ludovic coues : > I would say big data. > > Stackexchange have a pair of SQL Server, with 384Go of memory for > stackoverflow and 768 for everything else, a Redis server with 256, a > server for elasticsearch with 192 and same quantity for an HAProxy >

Re: Dell R930 server

I would say big data. Stackexchange have a pair of SQL Server, with 384Go of memory for stackoverflow and 768 for everything else, a Redis server with 256, a server for elasticsearch with 192 and same quantity for an HAProxy server. And that's just a successful website. They aren't a search