Re: 802.11n MIMO support in -current

wow, that's awesome! I've been rocking a athn lately but I'll swap back to iwm to help test On 12/10, Stefan Sperling wrote: The net80211 stack and iwm(4) driver now support MIMO in -current. In my own testing, things work just fine. But I have gotten used to breaking other people's wifi

Re: Bizarre arp entry corruption

On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote: seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface: Hello, This looks like some stupid TV game, where contesters are given some clues from time to time and they have to guess what is the real shit. Do post your FULL dmesg and

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Am 12/10/16 um 22:57 schrieb Peter Hessler: > On 2016 Dec 10 (Sat) at 22:56:05 +0100 (+0100), Christian Schulte wrote: > :$ uname -a > :OpenBSD t60.schulte.it 6.0 1KHZ.MP#7 amd64 > > You broke it. Please use a GENERIC kernel, and it will work as normal. > This is what I did using a recent

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Am 12/10/16 um 22:57 schrieb Peter Hessler: > On 2016 Dec 10 (Sat) at 22:56:05 +0100 (+0100), Christian Schulte wrote: > :$ uname -a > :OpenBSD t60.schulte.it 6.0 1KHZ.MP#7 amd64 > > You broke it. Please use a GENERIC kernel, and it will work as normal. > This is the configuration in use. Do

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Am 12/10/16 um 23:28 schrieb Karel Gardas: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Christian Schulte wrote: >> It's >> >> Operation timed out. Connections are very slow. Too slow so that they > > Not sure about the issue, but I've seen that last

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Christian Schulte wrote: > It's > > Operation timed out. Connections are very slow. Too slow so that they Not sure about the issue, but I've seen that last night too. Generally speaking there were too high number

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

On 2016 Dec 10 (Sat) at 22:56:05 +0100 (+0100), Christian Schulte wrote: :$ uname -a :OpenBSD t60.schulte.it 6.0 1KHZ.MP#7 amd64 You broke it. Please use a GENERIC kernel, and it will work as normal.

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Am 12/10/16 um 21:43 schrieb Kai: > Am 10. Dezember 2016 21:35:04 MEZ, schrieb Christian Schulte > : >> Hello, >> >> I am facing an issue accessing an SSL/TLS webserver from OpenBSD. I >> have >> another box not running OpenBSD connected to the same router and that >> box can

Re: em(4) watchdog timeotu on current/amd64

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 10:11:44AM -0700, johnwixard wrote: > I am having the same problem, did you solve it? > > /john > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/em-4-watchdog-timeotu-on-current-amd64-tp305845p309482.html > Sent from the openbsd

Re: SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Am 10. Dezember 2016 21:35:04 MEZ, schrieb Christian Schulte : >Hello, > >I am facing an issue accessing an SSL/TLS webserver from OpenBSD. I >have >another box not running OpenBSD connected to the same router and that >box can connect to that server flawlessly. I already tried to

SSL/TLS troubleshooting

Hello, I am facing an issue accessing an SSL/TLS webserver from OpenBSD. I have another box not running OpenBSD connected to the same router and that box can connect to that server flawlessly. I already tried to troubleshoot things with the administrator of that system without success. Is there

Re: IP Forwarding is not working?

On Fri, December 9, 2016 2:24 pm, é*·è*´å¼º wrote: > Hi, I donâ**t really think ip forwarding is broken either as I can still > access the Internet. > > # ifconfig > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 32768 >index 6 priority 0 llprio 3 >groups: lo >inet6 ::1

802.11n MIMO support in -current

The net80211 stack and iwm(4) driver now support MIMO in -current. In my own testing, things work just fine. But I have gotten used to breaking other people's wifi without being aware of it. So please test -current and let me know about any regressions. Because iwm(4) devices have 2 antennas MCS

Re: IP Forwarding is not working?

Hello, It turns out this only happens when I assign IPs to em1, em2 and em3 directly. After I bridged them with different virtual ethernets, everything works fine. Can anybody tell me why? Thanks! > On 10 Dec 2016, at 2:21 PM, 雷致强 wrote: > > en0 en2 and en3 are on my

Re: Is using dkim really worth?

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 01:11:30PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > >

Re: PC-Engines Wireless - PPPOE timeouts.

Tom Specific to your question the apu1d4 is configured to act as DSL bridge/PPPOE gateway on one ethernet interface. In addition a PCIe Atheros AR9281 is configured as a host-based access point for wireless clients & a second ethernet interface is configured to supply DHCP to la clients via a

Re: Is using dkim really worth?

Hi Walter, On Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:51:34 +0100 Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > So, in general and based on your experience, do you think using dkim > (that implies daemon, port redirections, etc.) is really worth? In terms of delivery to popular free mail providers, it sees to me that reverse

Re: Is using dkim really worth?

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. > > I'm

Re: Is using dkim really worth?

On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, at 11:51 AM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. > > I'm noticing

Re: PC-Engines Wireless - PPPOE timeouts.

Hello Patrick, your mail sounds a bit confusing. I assume you have a following setup: - your board is configured as router. - your internal interface is the wireless athn0 - your external interface is pppoe0 on a wired interface (like re0), but you do not tell us. >> Specifically if wireless

Re: Ruby on Rails and httpd

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016, at 04:57 PM, Murk Fletcher wrote: > Hi, > > Has anybody managed to come up with a working configuration of this? > > Thanks, > Murk > Hey, I tested/used the uWSGI tool as a proxy between httpd and rails in 5.7 with success. The uWSGI docs contain a section on both

Is using dkim really worth?

I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox. At the same time,

Re: Bizarre arp entry corruption

>> seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one specific interface: Hello, This looks like some stupid TV game, where contesters are given some clues from time to time and they have to guess what is the real shit. Do post your FULL dmesg and configurations for network if you really want