Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Alexander Hall
On April 11, 2017 5:54:31 AM GMT+02:00, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote on Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:30:35AM >+1000: > >> Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited >> indexing. > >That isn't true on OpenBSD. It still is true on most

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Ingo Schwarze
bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote on Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:30:35AM +1000: > Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited > indexing. That isn't true on OpenBSD. It still is true on most Linux distributions, and even on FreeBSD by default, but at least FreeBSD has an

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Another issue with the man pages is that there is extremely limited > indexing. They are manual pages, not manual books. You are welcome to spend your time building an entire new subsystem and proving the value of your work. Go knock yourself out.

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread bytevolcano
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:10:55 -0500 Adam Thompson wrote: > You've asked almost the same question as "why does anyone need > tutorials? just read the man pages!" just at the next level up. The > answer is because the man pages aren't adequate to cover every > scenario,

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Jason Tubnor
On 8 April 2017 at 07:41, Mihai Popescu wrote: > I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is > this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts? > > If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it > and post. Do you need the Con? >

Re: Topics for revised PF and networking tutorial

2017-04-10 Thread Adam Thompson
On 2017-04-07 16:41, Mihai Popescu wrote: I don;t want to offend you folks, but I'm curious and I will ask: is this BSDCon so useful? Does it pay the efforts? If someone has time and knowledge to do a PF tutorial he/she can do it and post. Do you need the Con? I'm asking this having in my mind

Re: framebuffer console video settings

2017-04-10 Thread Allan Streib
Allan Streib writes: > I have a Radeon video card. I recently got a pair of new Dell 25" > monitors. When I boot the system, initially I see the VGA console and > then it switches to framebuffer mode and the display goes blank, > replaced by a message from the monitor

IPv6 and netstat -r: larger columns, please?

2017-04-10 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi folks, would it be possible to adjust the column size for the IPv6 output of "netstat -r", similar to "netstat -nr"? Its pretty much useless, if the interface identifier is cut off. The usual workaround "netstat -r | cat" doesn't work, either.

Re: Unable to install OpenBSD 6.0 to HP Probook 4540s in UEFi mode

2017-04-10 Thread dmitry.sensei
? Max resolution ? [dmitriy.o@orlov-nb-centos ~]$ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 1366 x 768, maximum 32767 x 32767 LVDS1 connected primary 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 309mm x 174mm 1366x768 59.99*+ 39.94 1280x720 60.00 1024x768 60.00

Fwd: It is possible to start xenodm on Radeon HD 8730M (or Intel HD Graphics 4000) ?

2017-04-10 Thread dmitry.sensei
:) -- Forwarded message -- From: dmitry.sensei Date: Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 11:03 PM Subject: Re: It is possible to start xenodm on Radeon HD 8730M (or Intel HD Graphics 4000) ? To: Steven McDonald Thanks. Works without