Hi,
I have a Sunfire V120 (Sparc) with mirrored disks running OpenBSD 6.0.
I attempted to update to OpenBSD 6.1 using the files first from:
http://mirrors.sonic.net/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/sparc64
Then from:
https://ftp3.usa.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.1/sparc64
First I tried to copy bsd.rd to / and
Thank you, the patch appears to work. I haven't fully tested
connecting/establishing connections, so I'll send another update.
Prior to the patch, iked also complained about lack of public keys for
PSK connections 1 and 2 (in /etc/iked/pubkeys/fqdn/)
It doesn't mind them being absent anymore
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:03:38PM -0400, Igor V. Gubenko wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> OpenIKED just doesn't seem to like me much.
>
> I managed to get it working around 5.8 but from upgrade to upgrade I
> encountered different issues.
>
> I have 3 tunnels using IKEv2. 2 are using a PSK, and 1
El 2017-04-20 14:40, Predrag Punosevac escribió:
Sorry for the noise. Did anybody try to use slappasswd after
upgrading
from 6.0 to 6.1 (amd64). I get
slappasswd:/usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.12.0:
/usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.12.0 : WARNING: symbol(icudt58_dat) size
mismatch, relink your program
Hello everyone,
OpenIKED just doesn't seem to like me much.
I managed to get it working around 5.8 but from upgrade to upgrade I
encountered different issues.
I have 3 tunnels using IKEv2. 2 are using a PSK, and 1 is using cert/RSA
auth.
They were working fine on 6.0. However the same
Thank you for the info. So you expect a lower time in future.
Am 20.04.17 um 21:31 schrieb Christian Weisgerber:
> The exact numbers are a bit odd, but generally speaking, yes, adding
> clang has substantially increased the build time. I see about a
> doubling on Xeon E3-12xx-based machines for
Please dont get me wrong. I dont want to start any compiler wars.
I only was worried about the compile time.
Am 20.04.17 um 20:50 schrieb Karel Gardas:
> IMHO very unfair comparison and you should really wait till OpenBSD
> system/core is build with Clang and GCC 4.2.1 is removed from the
>
Yah, I ran into that too, syntax for that sorta stuff changed, now its
like this:
bind -T copy-mode-vi v send -X begin-selection
On 04/20, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Not really a question but one thing I noticed after upgrading dozen or
so OpenBSD servers from 6.0 to 6.1 per official
On 2017-04-20, Heiko wrote:
> So I guess the main advantage is the license?
> Or is clang technically (binaries, debug) better?
OpenBSD does not live in a bubble. If it did, we could still be
using gcc 2.95. But it turns out people, including OpenBSD
Sorry for the noise. Did anybody try to use slappasswd after upgrading
from 6.0 to 6.1 (amd64). I get
slappasswd:/usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.12.0:
/usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.12.0 : WARNING: symbol(icudt58_dat) size
mismatch, relink your program
I tried reinstalling openldap-server-2.4.44p3
On 2017-04-19, Heiko wrote:
> I'm using current on amd64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz,
> 3411.91 MHz)
>
> I noticed that with clang it needs 109 minutes for "make build" and
> before with gcc 32 minutes.
Not sure what you mean by "performance" in the
Not really a question but one thing I noticed after upgrading dozen or
so OpenBSD servers from 6.0 to 6.1 per official documentation is that my
.tmux.conf file is now broken.
/root/.tmux.conf:16: invalid or unknown command: bind-key -t vi-copy 'v'
begin-selection
/root/.tmux.conf:17: invalid or
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Heiko wrote:
> Hello Misc,
>
> I'm using current on amd64 (Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz,
> 3411.91 MHz)
>
> I noticed that with clang it needs 109 minutes for "make build" and
> before with gcc 32 minutes.
>
> Is this a
The answer may be in an irrelevant section of pf.conf. why not post it's
entirety.
Sent from BlueMail
On Apr 20, 2017, 10:15 AM, at 10:15 AM, "Sjöholm Per-Olov"
wrote:
>
>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 13:00, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2017, at
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 13:00, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 01:18, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 00:39, Fred wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/19/17 23:30, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
Anyone with a clue
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 03:08:30PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:59:10PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Just to be sure, when I get this message:
> >
> > maillog:Apr 20 13:53:03 server smtpd[99586]: smtp-out: Server certificate
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:59:10PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just to be sure, when I get this message:
>
> maillog:Apr 20 13:53:03 server smtpd[99586]: smtp-out: Server certificate
> verification failed on session 81c5fc1509d4c884
>
> Is it about my server
Hello everyone,
Just to be sure, when I get this message:
maillog:Apr 20 13:53:03 server smtpd[99586]: smtp-out: Server certificate
verification failed on session 81c5fc1509d4c884
Is it about my server cert or the remote one?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Florian,
On 04/20/17 12:45, Florian Ermisch wrote:
> Hi Harri,
>
> until someone in the know replies you could take a look at the DHCPv6 traffic
> to see if a lifetime is included in the replies (and maybe keep them handy
> for a dev to look
On Apr 16, 2017 7:23 AM, "Gregor Best" wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I have a laptop with a similar chipset. The issue is that the
inteldrm(4) driver does not support Skylake devices at the moment.
If you boot the machine EFI mode, efifb(4) should attach to the EFI
frame buffer. This
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 01:18, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 00:39, Fred wrote:
>>
>> On 04/19/17 23:30, Sjöholm Per-Olov wrote:
>>> Anyone with a clue would be _very_ much appreciated….
>>> I upgraded from 6.0 to 6.1 two days ago and
Hi,
I've come accross a strange parsing issue where if you have "modulate
state" set, then "set state-defaults pflow" does not set "(pflow)".
For example, the below dummy config :
set state-defaults pflow
table {192.0.2.0/24,198.51.100.0/24}
table {203.0.113.0/24}
pass in inet proto tcp from
Hi Harri,
until someone in the know replies you
could take a look at the DHCPv6 traffic
to see if a lifetime is included in the
replies (and maybe keep them handy for
a dev to look at). Maybe dhcpcd supports
this feature but there's an uncommon
combination of flags it doesn't know about
yet.
hi,
comments below
Am 19.04.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Remi Locherer:
here is the ipsec.conf on the openbsd machine
ike from {10.10.10.0/24} to 10.10.15.0/24 \
You need to add "peer AA.BB.CC.DD" here.
why, it's a passive setup the active site can have the peer part or did
this change
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:29:22PM -0500, Colton Lewis wrote:
> > > Can you show me a dmesg please, specifically the lines which are
> > > related to your wifi card?
>
> > athn0 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 "Atheros AR9281" rev 0x01:
Hi all,
In the following days, I want to replace some linux systems that acts as
IDS/IPS nodes with OpenBSD 6.1 (congratulations to all OpenBSD's team. IMO, the
best OpenBSD that I have used).
These OpenBSD nodes will be installed with Suricata, Bro and Snort components.
In the Linux and
Hello,
I have a problem with X and my "Mad Catz Mad Catz R.A.T.TE" usb mouse.
The problem happens when the mouse is plugged in and I try to do something with
the mouse in X.
I am using dwm 6.1 but I have also tried with TWM from base and the problem is
exactly the same.
The pointer is moving
Hello,
I have a table in my pf.conf that is declared and used as such:
table persist
block drop quick from
pass in on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from any to any port 22 keep state
(max-src-conn 5, max-src-conn-rate 5/3, overload flush global)
which gets flushed via roots crontab:
10
On 04/19/17 15:38, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
>
> You don't seem to have any autoconfigured addresses.
> Try ifconfig vether0 inet6 autoconf first.
>
Here is the output of ifconfig on my gateway:
# ifconfig re1
re1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr
29 matches
Mail list logo