pppd abort during LCP address negotiation [SOLVED]

The process of writing this out thoroughly - and making sure I'd searched the misc@ archives properly - got me a solution. Sending in the hope that it may help someone else. In short, the ISP requires that pppd sets the remote IP address with ':' in peer config. hth, tom I'm trying

Re: Autocompletion with pass in ksh

On Fri, 25 May 2018 08:36:44 +0200 Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: > I got a reply on twitter from Roman Zolltarif who wrote a blog post > about it :) > https://www.romanzolotarev.com/pass.html#Completions%20in%20Korn%20shell This seems to be a custom pass implementation.

Re: acme-client new cert error

On May 27, 2018 2:21:13 PM AKDT, Stuart Henderson wrote: >certbot used to just be called "letsencrypt" and was some kind of joint >EFF/letsencrypt development, hence the close relationship. That's fine. If certbot may be used with other CAs, and if letsencrypt is willing

Re: acme-client new cert error

On 2018-05-27, Florian Obser wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: >> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't >> > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also

Re: acme-client new cert error

On 2018-05-26, justina colmena wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 09:14:35 -0700 > Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > >> On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't >> > fetch it, letsencrypt's

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

would the renice command be of any use ... to change the priority of the process ? On 27 May 2018 at 22:09, BergenBergen BergenBergen wrote: > I'd much rather prefer a generic tool that could limit any process, rather > than trying to come up with ways to strip down

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

On 05/27/2018 10:02 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even running bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of electricity in my book. Once I encountered a mining site. The mining itself got annoying pretty fast. The

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

I'd much rather prefer a generic tool that could limit any process, rather than trying to come up with ways to strip down ones browser. FreeBSD has a cpulimit (https://github.com/opsengine/cpulimit/) port, and it would be nice if OpenBSD could too. I'm not skilled enough to make one, but I'd

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

On 20:02 Sun 27 May, Kevin Chadwick wrote: > Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even > running bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of > electricity in my book. Hell, javascript itself is a theft of electricity.

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

Umatrix is a good javascript control extension. Some websites are even running bitcoin mining without asking your permission. Theft of electricity in my book.

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

ksh(1) has ulimit comand to limit process in certain way. just search for ulimit on the ksh man-page. On 27 May 2018 at 18:28, Luke A. Call wrote: > I had that problem but turning off javascript (as someone else said), > turning off images most of the time, and bookmarking

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

I had that problem but turning off javascript (as someone else said), turning off images most of the time, and bookmarking the tab group then closing as many tabs as I wasn't actually going to use soonest (especially any viewing PDF files), dropped it down to ~4%. On 05-27 12:07:16+0200,

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

Have a look at http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/Port-request-cpulimit-td267083.html and please let me know how it went! All the best, Murk On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Maximilian Pichler < maxim.pich...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

On May 27, 2018 2:10 AM, viq wrote: > > On 18-05-26 20:30:32, Amelia A Lewis wrote: > > On Sun, 27 May 2018 00:43:02 +0200, viq wrote: > > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples, > > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate

Re: Limit CPU usage of a process?

On May 27, 2018 2:07:16 AM AKDT, Maximilian Pichler wrote: >Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process to, say, 20%? > >I'd like to slow down the web browser since it is draining my laptop's >battery. With enough tabs open it's often consuming ~50% of CPU

Limit CPU usage of a process?

Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process to, say, 20%? I'd like to slow down the web browser since it is draining my laptop's battery. With enough tabs open it's often consuming ~50% of CPU but not doing anything productive. Apparently with RLIMIT_CPU in setrlimit(2) the total CPU

Re: acme-client new cert error

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 09:14:35AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote: > On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't > > fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to). > > > > Firewall issue? > > Oh, FFS. >

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

On 18-05-27 09:34:10, Mark Patruck wrote: > For me it works with %{user.username} as mail.lmtp(8) user. > > See "FORMAT SPECIFIERS" in smtpd.conf(5) for details. Shows how well I read the man page With this it works, thank you! > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 09:04:56AM +0200, viq wrote: > > On

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

For me it works with %{user.username} as mail.lmtp(8) user. See "FORMAT SPECIFIERS" in smtpd.conf(5) for details. On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 09:04:56AM +0200, viq wrote: > On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: > > > > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

On 18-05-27 09:04:56, viq wrote: > On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: > > > > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples, > > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via > > > dovecot > > > lmtp" > > > (to have sieve working)

Re: programs crash on Dell Latitude E7470

On 18-05-25 14:15:08, Marco van Hulten wrote: > Hello— > > I have a Dell Latitude E7470 with the latest OpenBSD snapshot. > > $ uname -a > OpenBSD ultron.hulten.org 6.3 GENERIC.MP#45 amd64 > > dmesg is attached. > > Applications crash. For instance for Claws Mail: > >

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

On 18-05-26 20:30:32, Amelia A Lewis wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 00:43:02 +0200, viq wrote: > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples, > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via dovecot > > lmtp" > > (to have sieve working) into the new

Re: smtpd.conf new grammar

On 18-05-26 19:18:56, Edgar Pettijohn III wrote: > > > Sorry, I've read the announcements, looked at man pages and examples, > > but still didn't manage to figure out how to translate "deliver via dovecot > > lmtp" > > (to have sieve working) into the new syntax. So far my config was: > > > >