On 11/06/18 21:28, Marko Cupać wrote:
> I don't understand neither browser's code. However, current propaganda
> that reaches me goes along the lines "Firefox is made by non-profit
> organization with users' freedom in mind, while Chromium is made by
> for-profit organization for the purpose of
Hello list
I have a problem with spamd. It just don't seem to grey list or block,
or do anything else either. I can receive and send mail as usual.
First I had spamlogd_flags="" in my rc.conf local, but then it immediatly
whitelisted every conection on port 25, even the spammer I try to tarpit,
> Answered it in the long, the short version is: Chrome/Iridium is safer
code.
Chrome is also way more comfortable to develop y'all web/mobile apps in.
Win-win!
All the best,
Murk
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > In that case, are the Chromium updates in current
Hi all,
I've been doing some light reading on the topic of new(er) networking
protocols, and I've come across Locator/Identifier Seperation Protocol (LISP)
(RFC6830 and onwards) and Identifier/Locator Network Protocol (ILNP) (RFC6740
and onwards).
There appear to be implementations of LISP
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:05:02PM +0200, Pau wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to compile a very old piece of software, supermongo, on -current.
>
> The first complain I get from gmake is that
>
> get1char.c:26:14: fatal error: 'sgtty.h' file not found
> #include
> ^
>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 05:05:02PM +0200, Pau wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I am trying to compile a very old piece of software, supermongo, on -current.
>
> The first complain I get from gmake is that
>
> get1char.c:26:14: fatal error: 'sgtty.h' file not found
> #include
> ^
>
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 17:05:02 +0200, Pau wrote:
> I am trying to compile a very old piece of software, supermongo, on -current.
>
> The first complain I get from gmake is that
>
> get1char.c:26:14: fatal error: 'sgtty.h' file not found
> #include
> ^
> 1 error generated.
Hello:
I am trying to compile a very old piece of software, supermongo, on -current.
The first complain I get from gmake is that
get1char.c:26:14: fatal error: 'sgtty.h' file not found
#include
^
1 error generated.
*** Error 1 in devices (Makefile:5 'get1char.o')
My
> In that case, are the Chromium updates in current worth attempting to
> backport to stable?
the team does not do significant backports like that.
> Or are the stable builds safer than the backported Firefox builds
> throughout the six months or so that they remain frozen?
Answered it in the
In that case, are the Chromium updates in current worth attempting to backport
to stable? Or are the stable builds safer than the backported Firefox builds
throughout the six months or so that they remain frozen?
--
Patrick Harper
paia...@fastmail.com
On Mon, 11 Jun 2018, at 06:56, Theo
Marc Espie wrote:
> Chrome is a relative newcomer to browser land, and it was designed from
> the start from a security point of view, so it got a headstart there.
In a browser, there are 2 main security components you want: The main
security advantage is privsep. The other is W^X jit. Other
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 01:28:04PM +0200, Marko Cupa�? wrote:
> Hi,
>
> over last few years, I got an impression that OpenBSD project seem to
> favour Chromium over Firefox. For example, in:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/papers/BeckPledgeUnveilBSDCan2018.pdf
>
> "We know it's right when we can do
Hi,
over last few years, I got an impression that OpenBSD project seem to
favour Chromium over Firefox. For example, in:
https://www.openbsd.org/papers/BeckPledgeUnveilBSDCan2018.pdf
"We know it's right when we can do chrome."
"[...]chrome - the stuff we use frequently"
I don't understand
Le samedi 09 juin 2018 à 19:23 +0200, Denis Fondras a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 04:02:34PM +0200, Bastien Durel wrote:
> > shouldn't it check the rtm_priority to be RTP_LOCAL or
> > RTP_CONNECTED ??
> > it make no sense to start advertising prefix on an interface if the
> > prefix is over
14 matches
Mail list logo
