Chris Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:29:38PM +, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> >
> > I'm curious why you have to be root to set up networking, but the operator
> > group can shut the machine off.
> >
>
> Well, there are probably additional reasons too, but my father
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 04:29:38PM +, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
>
> I'm curious why you have to be root to set up networking, but the operator
> group can shut the machine off.
>
Well, there are probably additional reasons too, but my father happily
runs OpenBSD. Of course, he needs
On Wed, August 22, 2018 1:23 pm, Parikh, Samir wrote:
> flipchan wrote on 22/08/18 01:19:
>> Try removing all keys in the ssl directory aswell as
>> /etc/acme/letsencrypt-privkey.pem
>
> Thank you for your suggestion! I tried that and still received a similar
> error:
>
> # acme-client -vAD
flipchan wrote on 22/08/18 01:19:
> Try removing all keys in the ssl directory aswell as
> /etc/acme/letsencrypt-privkey.pem
Thank you for your suggestion! I tried that and still received a similar
error:
# acme-client -vAD git.example.com
acme-client: /etc/ssl/private/git.example.com.key:
Anthony J. Bentley wrote on 22/08/18 01:37:
> Do you see anything in /var/www/logs/access.log? Here's what I see:
>
> example.com 66.133.109.36 - - [21/Aug/2018:23:03:35 -0600] "GET
> /.well-known/acme-challenge/YXRuZWJ1c2FvdGV1Ym5hc290ZGFvZXNudGh1YW9lc25
> HTTP/1.1" 200 87
Thanks for your reply!
On Aug 22, 2018 9:10 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
>
> > Can't properly reply to the thread. I need to fix my subscription, but why
> > not just update the following to work on OpenBSD?
> >
> > https://github.com/ghostbsd/networkmgr
> >
> > Seems like a better use
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:49:57AM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 18:07 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote:
[...]
> > They're even slower and uglier if you have to run the m4 stuff to
> > *generate* them before you can even run them, and may not work as
> > intended if they're run through a version of
It's python.
On Aug 22, 2018 9:07 AM, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
>
> Can't properly reply to the thread. I need to fix my subscription, but why
> not just update the following to work on OpenBSD?
>
> https://github.com/ghostbsd/networkmgr
>
> Seems like a better use of resources than reinventing
Hi all,
in today's snapshot i see some strange dmesg cpu output. it feels like
cosmetic stuff only but i'm not sure ...
cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6134 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 3192.49 MHz
cpu1:
Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Can't properly reply to the thread. I need to fix my subscription, but why
> not just update the following to work on OpenBSD?
>
> https://github.com/ghostbsd/networkmgr
>
> Seems like a better use of resources than reinventing the wheel. Unless
> there is
Can't properly reply to the thread. I need to fix my subscription, but why
not just update the following to work on OpenBSD?
https://github.com/ghostbsd/networkmgr
Seems like a better use of resources than reinventing the wheel. Unless
there is something fundamental I am missing in the new
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:16:30AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi Jiri
>
> Protected domains are like protected ports on a switch
> two ports that are in the bridge with the same protected domain
> will not be able to communicate with each other,
>
> Protected domains are implemented on the Bridge
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:50:46AM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 00:22 Wed 22 Aug, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > > If you create a release
> > > (https://help.github.com/articles/creating-releases/) then all
> > > associated generated tarballs are immutable, as far as I know.
> >
> > They're not
On 00:22 Wed 22 Aug, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Consus writes:
> > On 18:07 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2018-08-21, Consus wrote:
> > > > On 15:05 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > >> > Also what's wrong with gitlab/github?
> > > >>
> > > >> They encourage devs to be
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 08:49:57AM +0300, Consus wrote:
> If you create a release
> (https://help.github.com/articles/creating-releases/) then all
> associated generated tarballs are immutable, as far as I know.
Please stop spreading this myth. It is 100% wrong.
These artifacts are not stable. If
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:29:59PM +0100, Michael Joy wrote:
> Has anyone found a way to get this working on OpenBSD?
Not working yet. There is some driver code related to this chip
in athn(4) but it's incomplete and doesn't work.
"Lic. Cardozo" wrote:
> Hello y'all.
>
> A totally newbie and non english speaker here.
>
> My case is simple. Today I receive my new computer, a DELL Inspiron 7000
> 2-in-1, with AMD Ryzen 7, etc.
> It came with Windows 10, and there everything worked fine. But I want to
> start the *nix
Hi Jiri
Protected domains are like protected ports on a switch
two ports that are in the bridge with the same protected domain
will not be able to communicate with each other,
Protected domains are implemented on the Bridge but not on
Switch in OpenBSD
Bridge Protected domain does work from
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 06:40:39AM +, Lic. Cardozo wrote:
> Hello y'all.
>
> A totally newbie and non english speaker here.
>
> My case is simple. Today I receive my new computer, a DELL Inspiron 7000
> 2-in-1, with AMD Ryzen 7, etc.
> It came with Windows 10, and there everything worked
Hello y'all.
A totally newbie and non english speaker here.
My case is simple. Today I receive my new computer, a DELL Inspiron 7000
2-in-1, with AMD Ryzen 7, etc.
It came with Windows 10, and there everything worked fine. But I want to start
the *nix experience,
so I installed openBSD 6.3
Consus writes:
> On 18:07 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018-08-21, Consus wrote:
> > > On 15:05 Tue 21 Aug, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> > Also what's wrong with gitlab/github?
> > >>
> > >> They encourage devs to be lazy and not produce proper stable release ass
> ets.
> > >>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 06:39:22PM +0200, jirib wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was checking bridge's protected domains and I'm curious
> how to add VMM VM's tap into a VMM switch/bridge protected domain.
>
> It seems it's not implemented yet.
>
> I wanted to achieve this:
>
> - multiple VMM VMs in same
22 matches
Mail list logo
