Hi,
i'm not replying to the trolls (or their off-topic rants) in this
thread, and i'm not spamming other project's lists. Instead, i'd
merely like to clarify a point that is actually on topic on this
list, to avoid that users get confused by FUD.
One of the trolls wrote:
> A gratuitous
zeur here.
I now[0] see that a whole bunch of lists were Cc'd, and while I'm not
sorry for not preserving the Ccs, I realize that you might not have been
addressing us, misc@OpenBSD.org.
I still think my point holds, though. This should be a matter of great
concern for OpenBSD, like it is to
zeur here.
> This whole discussion is best served elsewhere.
Yeah, comfortably away from an affected project, for sure! Remember what
happened w/ ipf(4)? Now imagine peope getting angry at theo (not an
uncommon thing, given his behaviour), and retaliating by revoking their
license to crucial
zeur here.
> NOTHING to hold them to a promise THEY NEVER MADE.
This is what I've suspected for a long time -- the only solution appears
to be the public domain. For jurisdictions were the public domain is not
legally recognized (I've been told they exist), a workaround /may/ be to
not attach
What is going on here? It seems to me, that I have to stop using my lovely,
my the best and my other such the words FreeBSD.
Why should I stop? Because of theese stupid, totally political, totally
bullshits! Does the FreeBSD dying under those "modern” tolerancy? It was
the best system, I really
Waiting quietly for two months for Eben Moglen's preliminary write-up
(which I was to be sent to "correct") got me no-where. Every seems to
have concluded that the issue is settled since there was no more public
discussion.
All the "other side" said was "nuh-uh" and "you're not a lawyer"
This whole discussion is best served elsewhere.
On Thursday, December 27, 2018, wrote:
> Why is no one discussing this anymore.
>
> It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
> programmers.
>
> Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT KNOW THE LAW simply by virtue
>
Are you aware we are in the end of year holidays? I recommend you to
not call others as an idiot, as the only idiot here are you ;)
On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 9:31 PM wrote:
>
> Why is no one discussing this anymore.
>
> It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
>
Why is no one discussing this anymore.
It's like you just accepted the "NU UH U WRONG" proclamation from
programmers.
Are you idiots aware that programmers DO NOT KNOW THE LAW simply by
virtue of being "smarts"?
Are you idiots aware that I am a lawyer, I have studied the law, and I
do
(2) ... (I am not going to go over the legal mistakes you've made,
because of (1))...
I have not made legal mistakes, pompous programmer asshole*.
A gratuitous license, absent an attached interest, is revocable at will.
This goes for GPLv2 as used by linux, just as it goes for the BSD
I'm using OpenBSD 6.4 on a pcengines apu2 box as a router/firewall for a
CenturyLink DSL (pppoe) connection.
Today I set up rd6 for ipv6 for the first time, similar to what is
described here:
https://gist.github.com/afresh1/791343380b4410687d51fdd94f20bd42
Things are working well but one minor
> >> i have openbsd 6.4 release installed
> >> how do i fix this ?
Don't mix release with current ports.
Either install a current snapshot or ...
> doas cvs -d anon...@anoncvs1.ca.openbsd.org:/cvs -q up -Pd -A
>
rm -rf /usr/ports
And checkout a release ports tree.
See the FAQ for
On 12/27/18 3:48 AM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> shadrock uhuru writes:
>> hi everyone
>>
>> i have openbsd 6.4 release installed
>>
>> when i try to make install ports/devel/pygame i get an error stating
>>
>> create /usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/py-game-1.9.3.tgz
>> error: Libraries in
13 matches
Mail list logo
