On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 07:02:11AM +, Michael Joy wrote:
I'd be more than willing to a Pinebook for testing. I wanted one anyway.
If I end up buying one, I'll buy one for you too :)
Hey,
I have an ESI MAYA44 USB+
(https://www.esi-audio.com/products/maya44usb+/) with 8 channels (2
stereo input + 2 stereo output) and a headphone jack:
uaudio0 at uhub0 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "ESI Audiotechnik GmbH
MAYA44 USB+" rev 1.00/3.01 addr 2
uaudio0: audio rev 1.00, 8 mixer c
On 2019-01-18, Frank Beuth wrote:
> (misc got dropped?)
Yes, your mail was off-list so I replied off-list.
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:28:05PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > I'll take a look at that. Why would you prefer the PINE64 over the RBP?
>>
>> Partly due to the improved storage/c
On 1/18/2019 11:10 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
It really depends on what you want/need.
If you would like to host your own DNS servers, then multi location is a
good idea:
Example: Master NS1 in LA and Slave NS2 in Miami.
I have no idea about GoDiddy but my US based domain hosting company
let'
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:38:12AM -0800, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I have had problems with setting up DNS for myself and I need it to be
> authoritative.
This means you need at least two servers for this, that will be running
nsd (as supplied in base) or another authoritative dns server. Pick one
It really depends on what you want/need.
If you would like to host your own DNS servers, then multi location is a
good idea:
Example: Master NS1 in LA and Slave NS2 in Miami.
I have no idea about GoDiddy but my US based domain hosting company
let's me specify my own ns servers, as their D
I have had problems with setting up DNS for myself and I need it to be
authoritative.
I have my domains registered with Godaddy and they do not support for
domains not hosted on their servers. I have been using their DNS without
big problems, except that I'm not getting proper results with regards
To be more precise:
I use net/ifstat for current bw testing.
If I push data by netcat over public IPs, it is up to 5MB/s.
If I push data by netcat through VPN, it is up to 400KB/s.
Endusers in LANs also complain about VPN bw.
> You should use curl + nginx (with tmpfs) or iperf for bw testing.
I d
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 8:58 AM Radek wrote:
> I have configured Site-to-Site ikev2 VPN between two routers (Soekris
> net5501-70).
> Over the internet my transfer speed between these machines is up to
> 5000KB/s (it is OK).
> Over the VPN it is up to 400KB/s only.
>
> Is there any way to squeeze
I have configured Site-to-Site ikev2 VPN between two routers (Soekris
net5501-70).
Over the internet my transfer speed between these machines is up to 5000KB/s
(it is OK).
Over the VPN it is up to 400KB/s only.
Is there any way to squeeze more performance out from these hardware and speed
up th
Sorry, I haven't tried it yet. I'll do it ASAP.
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:05:32 -0600
ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 01:39:13PM -0600, ed...@pettijohn-web.com wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 08:04:32PM +0100, Radek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would gladly play with
11 matches
Mail list logo
