Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date

[Antonino Sidoti]

Hi,

No issue in finding the contact details. It is on the site.
Public Directory 



> On 8 Mar 2019, at 10:51 am, Stuart Henderson  wrote:
> 
> On 2019-03-07, Christer Solskogen  wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 13:19 Geir Svalland  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello all.
>>> 
>>> Any chance to get the http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/opensmtpd.html
>>> updated ?
>>> 
>> 
>> Probably. But why not rather ask the person behind the site instead of this
>> mailing list?
>> 
> 
> No contact details on the site.
> 
> If people are going to put up content like this, PLEASE:
> 
> - mention the date and relevant OpenBSD version number up front
> and clearly visible so people aren't tricked into thinking something
> 4 years old is still valid. (the iked page on this site is better in
> this regard).
> 
> - provide contact details
> 
> - keeping it up to date would be nice too. getting it into shape
> for www/faq/ would be even nicer, there's some useful information
> there which would likely make a good addition.
> 
> 

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date

[Zach Nedwich]

http://tomd.tel

It appears the author has contact details on their personal site (which 
references puffysecurity). Might be worth getting in touch with them via the 
email listed.



On 8 March 2019 9:51:02 am AEST, Stuart Henderson  wrote:
>On 2019-03-07, Christer Solskogen  wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 13:19 Geir Svalland 
>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all.
>>>
>>> Any chance to get the http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/opensmtpd.html
>>> updated ?
>>>
>>
>> Probably. But why not rather ask the person behind the site instead
>of this
>> mailing list?
>>
>
>No contact details on the site.
>
>If people are going to put up content like this, PLEASE:
>
>- mention the date and relevant OpenBSD version number up front
>and clearly visible so people aren't tricked into thinking something
>4 years old is still valid. (the iked page on this site is better in
>this regard).
>
>- provide contact details
>
>- keeping it up to date would be nice too. getting it into shape
>for www/faq/ would be even nicer, there's some useful information
>there which would likely make a good addition.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date

[Stuart Henderson]

On 2019-03-07, Christer Solskogen  wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 13:19 Geir Svalland  wrote:
>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> Any chance to get the http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/opensmtpd.html
>> updated ?
>>
>
> Probably. But why not rather ask the person behind the site instead of this
> mailing list?
>

No contact details on the site.

If people are going to put up content like this, PLEASE:

- mention the date and relevant OpenBSD version number up front
and clearly visible so people aren't tricked into thinking something
4 years old is still valid. (the iked page on this site is better in
this regard).

- provide contact details

- keeping it up to date would be nice too. getting it into shape
for www/faq/ would be even nicer, there's some useful information
there which would likely make a good addition.

Re: Puffy Security smtpd out of date

[Christer Solskogen]

On Thu, Mar 7, 2019, 13:19 Geir Svalland  wrote:

> Hello all.
>
> Any chance to get the http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/opensmtpd.html
> updated ?
>

Probably. But why not rather ask the person behind the site instead of this
mailing list?

Re: Support for Nvidia chipsets, never running X

[Nick Holland]

On 3/7/19 7:19 AM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> I've avoided anything with Nvidia like the plague.
> But it just occurred to me to ask, ignoring X completely and never
> running it, are the rest of the Nvidia parts supported or is Nvidia
> anything a total no-go?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris Bennett
> 
> 

it..varies.
A few couple years ago, I retired an nvidia chipped system I used as a
firewall for a few years.  Disk I/O was slow, USB support seemed slow (I
was booting from a USB flash drive).  NICs were some em(4) and dc(4)
add-in cards.  However, it pumped packets around just fine, but the rest
of the machine was "eh".

So...  If you end up with an nvidia powered machine in your pile, give
it a try and see how it works for *your application*.  If you are
buying, no, I'd just avoid it, the alternatives work better.

Nick.

Support for Nvidia chipsets, never running X

[Chris Bennett]

I've avoided anything with Nvidia like the plague.
But it just occurred to me to ask, ignoring X completely and never
running it, are the rest of the Nvidia parts supported or is Nvidia
anything a total no-go?

Thanks,
Chris Bennett

Puffy Security smtpd out of date

[Geir Svalland]

Hello all.

Any chance to get the http://puffysecurity.com/wiki/opensmtpd.html updated ?

Actual description are out of date. Don't work anymore.

/Hasse