On 2020-01-04 09:21, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-01-04, Nazar Zhuk wrote:
I get SCRIPT_FILENAME passed from httpd relative to httpd chroot
(/site1/htdocs/... ) and PHP being chrooted into /var/www/site1 needs
that to be relative to it's own chroot (/htdocs/...).
httpd is a bit inflexible
>I am running Fossil to synchronize my ports work on
>laptop and computer and I am amazed how easy it is,
>how I wish I had my own domain to share my work
>(both finished and WIP) to public...
wow, you don't even have your own domain. you sound poor.
that makes it easy to guess you don't know
On 2020/01/05 00:33, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> January 5, 2020 2:24 AM, "Roderick" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> >
> >> so I don't understand what's wrong with FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
> >
> > I do not see a problem in CVS.
>
> Sure, but I started this thread
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 12:33:58AM +, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> January 5, 2020 2:24 AM, "Roderick" wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> >
> >> so I don't understand what's wrong with FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
> >
> > I do not see a problem in CVS.
>
> Sure, but I
January 5, 2020 2:24 AM, "Roderick" wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, go...@disroot.org wrote:
>
>> so I don't understand what's wrong with FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
>
> I do not see a problem in CVS.
Sure, but I started this thread because of OpenBSD's plan
to migrate to Git.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, Philippe Meunier wrote:
> Roderick wrote:
> >I do use openssl for encrypting files in my laptop.
>
> So do I. I only encrypt the 0.001% of files that are really important and
> then those files are encrypted on my computer too, not just on the backup
> system [...]
I have
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> so I don't understand what's wrong with FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
I do not see a problem in CVS.
January 4, 2020 10:36 PM, "Roderick" wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
>> Fossil is superfine and I'd like it for various reasons too, but
>> unfortunately
>> it does not scale to the OpenBSD repo size well.
>>
>> As a test, you can try and clone fossil repo of NetBSD and I'm
On 1/4/2020 5:46 PM, Ben Lee wrote:
Hi,
I have an amd64 system that I am using as a router/firewall for my home
network running OpenBSD 6.6-stable with the latest syspatches. I have
been running it without problems in an IPv4-only configuration.
Recently, I decided I wanted to experiment
Hi,
I have an amd64 system that I am using as a router/firewall for my home
network running OpenBSD 6.6-stable with the latest syspatches. I have
been running it without problems in an IPv4-only configuration.
Recently, I decided I wanted to experiment with running a dual stack
IPv4 and IPv6
Hello,
today I'm proud to release portable cwm 6.6.
Portable cwm is a minor modification of the cwm version in OpenBSD CVS
with a portable Makefile and a few compatibility features. It has
been built successfully on OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, OS X 10.9 and Linux.
This port requires pkg-config,
On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Fossil is superfine and I'd like it for various reasons too, but unfortunately
> it does not scale to the OpenBSD repo size well.
>
> As a test, you can try and clone fossil repo of NetBSD and I'm sure you will
> find out quickly why people are working
Hi,
I have an amd64 system that I am using as a router/firewall for my home
network running OpenBSD 6.6-stable with the latest syspatches. I have
been running it without problems in an IPv4-only configuration.
Recently, I decided I wanted to experiment with running a dual stack
IPv4 and
Fossil is superfine and I'd like it for various reasons too, but
unfortunately it does not scale to the OpenBSD repo size well.
As a test, you can try and clone fossil repo of NetBSD and I'm sure you
will find out quickly why people are working on GoT and OpenGIT.
On 1/4/20 5:20 PM,
Hi,
I have an amd64 system that I am using as a router/firewall for my home
network running OpenBSD 6.6-stable with the latest syspatches. I have
been running it without problems in an IPv4-only configuration.
Recently, I decided I wanted to experiment with running a dual stack
IPv4 and IPv6
Namaste Philippe,
Merci beaucoup for your reply.
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2020 at 3:54 PM
> From: "Philippe Meunier"
> To: "Aham Brahmasmi"
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org, Roderick
> Subject: Re: Request for recommendation - encryption and signature for file
> backup
>
> >Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 04:59:40PM +, go...@disroot.org wrote:
> I never read
Please stop wasting our time then.
Thanks,
Florian
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
>Aham Brahmasmi wrote:
>> In my limited understanding, to securely backup and restore a file, the
>> steps are:
>>
>> To backup:
>> Step 1 - encrypt the file using a tool
>> Step 2 - sign the encrypted file using a tool
>> Step 3 - backup the signature and the encrypted file
>>
>> To restore:
>>
January 4, 2020 6:45 PM, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> go...@disroot.org writes:
>
>> Git is the most popular VCS (and most ugly), meanwhile
>> there are people who prefer to reimplement it because
>> they don't like its license... FreeBSD is working on OpenGit,
>> OpenBSD is working on Game of
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 1:34 PM Mischa wrote:
>
> On 20 Dec at 06:16, William Ahern wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:52:03PM +0100, Alexander Pluhar wrote:
> > >
> > > > Just upgraded my APU2 to the latest -current and it seems to hang on
> > > > the disk.
> > > > It was fine running on
go...@disroot.org writes:
> Git is the most popular VCS (and most ugly), meanwhile
> there are people who prefer to reimplement it because
> they don't like its license... FreeBSD is working on OpenGit,
> OpenBSD is working on Game of Trees, but why reimplement
> the wheel instead of using a
Git is the most popular VCS (and most ugly), meanwhile
there are people who prefer to reimplement it because
they don't like its license... FreeBSD is working on OpenGit,
OpenBSD is working on Game of Trees, but why reimplement
the wheel instead of using a better solution: Fossil?
I like CVS and
On 2020-01-04, Nazar Zhuk wrote:
> I get SCRIPT_FILENAME passed from httpd relative to httpd chroot
> (/site1/htdocs/... ) and PHP being chrooted into /var/www/site1 needs
> that to be relative to it's own chroot (/htdocs/...).
httpd is a bit inflexible (intentionally, I think). Can you work
I'm the original poster of this thread,
don't mean to whip a dead horse, but this
post is to confirm the state of this
issue.
The most recent -current release before
this post has fixed this issue for me.
OpenBSD 6.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #573: Sat Dec 28 19:13:57 MST 2019
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 02:07:26PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> This might be relevant:
>
> hw.setperf=0
>
hey, sorry for late reply
actually setting that one to 100 doesn't help
to solve the problem, CPU frequency is still
1100 MHz and everything was still lagging
> See also:
On 20 Dec at 06:16, William Ahern wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:52:03PM +0100, Alexander Pluhar wrote:
> >
> > > Just upgraded my APU2 to the latest -current and it seems to hang on the
> > > disk.
> > > It was fine running on -current #512.
> >
> > I encountered this problem on 6.6
Hello Aham,
Aham Brahmasmi wrote on Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 02:27:59PM +0100:
> I was under the (now incorrect) impression that the rsync{d}.5 links
> were related to configuration files for rsync{d}, hence my query. I now
> understand that they are rsync protocol descriptions.
No one provided an
27 matches
Mail list logo