Re: What are xxxterm users using today?

2020-02-01 Thread Gonzalo Rodriguez
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports=148587723122194=2 — gonzalo > On 31. Jan 2020, at 18:46, Allan Streib wrote: > > I used to use xxxterm, then xombrero, and really liked the minimal > approach and keyboard driven navigation. > > Any other former users of this browser, what are you using

Re: Stuck on remote rsync with BackupPC and openrsync

2020-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-02-01, Fabian wrote: > Hi, > > I have been trying to get BackupPC 3.3.2 running on a Debian 10/Buster > server to back up my OpenBSD 6.6 router. It works fine with the GNU > rsync port on the OpenBSD box but when I try to use the native > openrsync instead, it just seems to not get

Re: updating calibre port

2020-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-02-01, aisha wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a request for updating the calibre port to the newer versions as > I am running a small calibre library server. > > Thanks a lot! > It's not likely to happen anytime soon. Updating to new calibre, including all the required dependencies (which

updating calibre port

2020-02-01 Thread aisha
Hi all, I had a request for updating the calibre port to the newer versions as I am running a small calibre library server. Thanks a lot! -- Aisha blog.aisha.cc

Stuck on remote rsync with BackupPC and openrsync

2020-02-01 Thread Fabian
Hi, I have been trying to get BackupPC 3.3.2 running on a Debian 10/Buster server to back up my OpenBSD 6.6 router. It works fine with the GNU rsync port on the OpenBSD box but when I try to use the native openrsync instead, it just seems to not get started properly and hangs. On the Debian

Re: Resource temporarily unavailable: have to recompile?

2020-02-01 Thread Strahil Nikolov
On February 1, 2020 12:27:40 AM GMT+02:00, "Luke A. Call" wrote: >Cancel the cancellation. >I am still seeing this problem, even after logging out/in and ulimit -u >shows 712. Running "ps -U myusername|less" yields about 180 lines and >the system becomes unable to start even another xterm, or

Re: Recovering corrupted encrypted partition

2020-02-01 Thread Strahil Nikolov
On February 1, 2020 2:20:12 AM GMT+02:00, Jan Stary wrote: >On Jan 31 18:25:45, int1...@airmail.cc wrote: >> Hello, >> Recently my 6.6-stable machine lost power while on, which aparently >> corrupted a softraid crypto partition (not a boot partition) that was >> mounted. Trying to decrypt it with

Re: How did it happen?

2020-02-01 Thread gilles
February 1, 2020 2:01 PM, "Uwe Werler" wrote: > Thank you very much Gilles for the insights. > > It's not really your fault because it's how our brain works. If we want to > get things working we > are concentrating to get them working - not how to break them. It's amazing > that the code

Re: How did it happen?

2020-02-01 Thread Uwe Werler
Am 31. Januar 2020 18:48:51 GMT+00:00 schrieb gil...@poolp.org: >January 30, 2020 4:44 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > >> It depends on your configuration, not all setups are vulnerable. >> >> I think I recall your name from the comments on my tutorial and this >is a >> setup that would not be

Re: .forward MDA fails, "mail.local: may only be run by the superuser"

2020-02-01 Thread Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 09:29:16AM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote: > February 1, 2020 9:11 AM, "Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri" > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line > > in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with > > > > Feb 1

Re: Support for ath10k QCA988x devices

2020-02-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 03:33:00PM -0800, Alexander Merritt wrote: > On 2017-04-12 Stefan Sperling wrote > > ath10k devices are not supported. They need a new driver because Atheros > > has changed the driver<->hardware interface with this generation of devices. > > Is there any update? A brief

Re: .forward MDA fails, "mail.local: may only be run by the superuser"

2020-02-01 Thread Stuart Henderson
misc@ is really not the right place for bug reports. Use bugs@, or opensmtpd has its own lists: https://opensmtpd.org/list.html On 2020-02-01, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote: > Hi, > > With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line > in one's ~/.forward makes delivery

Re: .forward MDA fails, "mail.local: may only be run by the superuser"

2020-02-01 Thread gilles
February 1, 2020 9:11 AM, "Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri" wrote: > Hi, > > With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line > in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with > > Feb 1 08:53:53 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13 smtp connected > address=local >

.forward MDA fails, "mail.local: may only be run by the superuser"

2020-02-01 Thread Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri
Hi, With the latest snapshot on amd64 (6.6 GENERIC.MP#627), using a "|"-line in one's ~/.forward makes delivery of mail fail with Feb 1 08:53:53 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13 smtp connected address=local host=pooh.prefix.duckdns.org Feb 1 08:53:54 pooh smtpd[72575]: d9abac6b3d904e13