On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:13 AM Consus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> > I read the 16 partitions thread and think, "I marvel at their patience
> > with interlocutors who have not read the relevant source code and give
> > no indication that they
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:46 AM Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:46:06AM +0200, Moises Simon wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:38:58PM -0500, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
> wrote:
> > > I think increasing -b option in sndiod helps to prevent audio jumping,
> I
> > > hear
I've had a hell of a time getting Pg.so to load under base httpd.
env LD_DEBUG=1 chroot /var/www script.pl
gives errors about DynaLoader not being able to load due to a missing
library.
After looking at Postgresql libraries loaded using pg_config --libs
I moved just those libs under /var/www.
Hi all!
Years ago, I mean 10+, I was -- strangely -- quite actively using RCS for local
configuration file history management, and fell into the same pit myself.
I made this [1] off the cuff diff then, and reading this thread thought that I
need to see how badly it would apply for today's
Hello,
Great idea - thanks a bunch!
--Chad
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday 30. April 2020 kl. 19:07, Anthony J. Bentley
wrote:
> Chad Hoolie writes:
>
> > Why does "tls keypair" in relayd.conf look for the regular and not the
> > fullchain certificate?
>
> Certificate filenames
Chad Hoolie writes:
> Why does "tls keypair" in relayd.conf look for the regular and not the
> fullchain certificate?
Certificate filenames are defined by your acme-client.conf.
> Thus, forcing users who want an A+ certificate to spend hours
> searching the web for this hack?
>
> cd /etc/ssl
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 07:22:35AM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote:
> Some people read replies in misc and say, "wow, Theo and the OBSD devs
> are obnoxiously harsh.'
>
> I read the 16 partitions thread and think, "I marvel at their patience
> with interlocutors who have not read the relevant
Adam Thompson wrote:
> AFAICT, GNU RCS (v5.9.4, ca. 2015, examined) creates a temp file,
> unlinks the target file, then renames the temp file. I beleve this
> guarantees(-ish, modulo "special" filesystems including NFS and
> FreeBSD's directory-SUID behaviour) that resulting file ownership =
>
Being neither a C programmer nor a Texinfo fan, checking GNU RCS is a
bit painful, and my conclusions aren't guaranteed.
AFAICT, GNU RCS (v5.9.4, ca. 2015, examined) creates a temp file,
unlinks the target file, then renames the temp file. I beleve this
guarantees(-ish, modulo "special"
Thanks a lot for the help Martijn.
Fingers crossed it will appear soon. Our search engine rankings depend on it!
--Chad
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:16 PM, Martijn van Duren
wrote:
> If it's not in the manpage it's probably not there.
> I did gave a quick
On 2020-04-30 13:55, Chad Hoolie wrote:
> Any idea about relayd though? I don't see any mentioning of 1.3 in man
> relayd.conf:
I'm not a dev but tls1.3 dropped RSA and I think requires ecdsa key support that
relayd currently lacks.
Although httpd was originally based on relayd. I assume the
Any idea about relayd though? I don't see any mentioning of 1.3 in man
relayd.conf:
tls
no tlsv1.2
Disable the TLSv1.2 protocol. The default is to enable
TLSv1.2.
sslv3 Enable the SSLv3 protocol. The default is no sslv3.
tlsv1 Enable all TLSv1 protocols. This
If it's not in the manpage it's probably not there.
I did gave a quick look through the relayd source, but from what I saw
there's no TLS1.3 support there.
On 4/30/20 3:55 PM, Chad Hoolie wrote:
> Any idea about relayd though? I don't see any mentioning of 1.3 in man
> relayd.conf:
>
> tls
>
Some people read replies in misc and say, "wow, Theo and the OBSD devs
are obnoxiously harsh.'
I read the 16 partitions thread and think, "I marvel at their patience
with interlocutors who have not read the relevant source code and give
no indication that they would understand it if they did."
On 4/30/20 1:19 PM, Chad Hoolie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using httpd with acme-client and Let's Encrypt
> (https://www.romanzolotarev.com/openbsd/acme-client.html).
>
> This setup, however, only seems to support TLS 1.2, whereas TLS 1.3 is needed
> to achieve A+ ratings across the board.
>
>
On Apr 29 14:12:24, open...@2al.ch wrote:
> I have an Macmini2,1 from mid 2007 with similar specs [1] and presumably
> similar firmware. I tested a whole lot of combinations for booting it and
> came to the following conclusion:
>
> To boot OpenBSD you have to use the internal SATA or ATA
Hi,
Why does "tls keypair" in relayd.conf look for the regular and not the
fullchain certificate?
Thus, forcing users who want an A+ certificate to spend hours searching the web
for this hack?
cd /etc/ssl
doas mv foobar.com.crt foobar.com.crt.bak
doas ln -s foobar.com.fullchain.pem
Hello,
I'm using httpd with acme-client and Let's Encrypt
(https://www.romanzolotarev.com/openbsd/acme-client.html).
This setup, however, only seems to support TLS 1.2, whereas TLS 1.3 is needed
to achieve A+ ratings across the board.
Anybody know how to make the upgrade?
--Chad
G'day Adam/all,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:43:42 -0500 Adam Thompson wrote:
> When I use co(1) with "-l" to check out a file (and/or "ci -l") is
> there any way to preserve file ownership and *not* have it reset to
> the user running co(1) or ci(1)?
Attached is a script I've used for years to work
19 matches
Mail list logo
