> On 14 May 2020, at 4:22 pm, mabi wrote:
>
> Hi Iain,
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:55 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
>
>> More details are at:https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=156229058006706&w=2
>
> I actually already read that one after seeing the a
Hello guys.
Today, I've installed OpenBSD 6.7 on Windows 10 pro ( Hyper-V ) which I
already has 6.6 running very well.
So, the planning was:
Migrate my conf's, turn off my 6.6 and make use of 6.7.
1 - By default hyper-v add's one processor. In the end of my fresh install
it doesn't work ( trie
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 17:39, infoomatic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> just for info: Upgrading from 6.6 to 6.7 worked without flaws on my
> OpenBSD VMs on Linux/KVM and FreeBSD/bhyve hypervisors! 6.7 feels faster
> and snappier! Thanks to you all for your hard work!
You might want to share how you did it.
First of all, I'd like to thank everyone who replied to me!
Thank you for explaining things.
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:59 PM Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Andras Farkas wrote on Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:07:36PM -0400:
> > For example, I first learnt vi a few years ago, back
> > when I was first learning
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:36:56PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> congrats to the new release.
>
> Question about https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade67.html:
> Shouldn't it be
>
> net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
> net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
>
> Thats what I found in my sysctl.conf (be
Hi folks,
congrats to the new release.
Question about https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade67.html:
Shouldn't it be
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
Thats what I found in my sysctl.conf (before upgrade).
Regards
Harri
Levai, Daniel wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I noticed facette became broken in 6.7. Do you guys use any neat tool to
> graph collectd RRDs? Preferably in ports or at most something
> git-pullable but with no outside deps (relative to base or ports).
>
> Thanks for the input!
>
> Dani
Hi Dani,
Be
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 13:31, Marc Espie wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > Some of these documents have a proprietary licence attached to it and
> > I believe it's due to the 1994 AT&T settlement. There are third party
> > collections (like this: https:
> Proposed release poster design:
> Puffy with puffed out cheeks & paper sticking out of his mouth.
> Headline: "Man pages are all you need to live!"
> Alternate headlines:
> "We *can* live on man pages alone!"
I think it's better to clarify who this "we" is/are.
Not _all_ needed info for install
Hi,
just for info: Upgrading from 6.6 to 6.7 worked without flaws on my
OpenBSD VMs on Linux/KVM and FreeBSD/bhyve hypervisors! 6.7 feels faster
and snappier! Thanks to you all for your hard work!
Regards,
infoomatic
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:25:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > > FWIW, my soekris net5501 with 256MB of RAM and 5
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 10:25:14AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 2020-04-10 10:10, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 09:35:16AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
> > FWIW, my soekris net5501 with 256MB of RAM and 512MB swap does manage
> > to relink a kernel (on 6.6 + syspatches).
>
>
thanks, i got it.
so probably i should manually patch, recompile and install kernel again.
Then should i care about boot time kernel re-linking if i have such a
custom kernel?
Claudio, please, do not forget to advice with the question about
RT_TABLEID_MAX itself,
i hope i clarified you what im tal
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:43:19PM +0100, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> Some of these documents have a proprietary licence attached to it and
> I believe it's due to the 1994 AT&T settlement. There are third party
> collections (like this: https://github.com/sergev/4.4BSD-Lite2) but
> I'm not sure if one
On 2020-05-19 13:45, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-05-19, Mark Patruck wrote:
Hi,
sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
Problem tracked down, diff is on bugs@.
Thanks. Missed that one.
I saw lots of p
Bars Bars wrote:
> Thank you much.
>
> Do you mean i should not do syspatch if a modified kernel sources?
syspatches can deliver replacements for kernel .o files
So if you have changed a .h or .c file, the syspatches are not
going to work correctly.
Once you use source-code methods, you can't
On 2020-05-19, Mark Patruck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
> loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
Problem tracked down, diff is on bugs@.
>
> I saw lots of permission denied errors for /tmp while
> trying to build via dpb. Reason was
Hi,
sounds strange, but is anyone else seeing mfs mounted fs
loosing permissions after reboot in -current (12h old)?
I saw lots of permission denied errors for /tmp while
trying to build via dpb. Reason was /tmp mounted 755
after boot.
# chmod 1777 /tmp; ls -l /
drwxrwxrwt 6 root wheel
The same thing, but for 6.7p0.
Cheers,
Alex
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:54 PM Alex Naumov
wrote:
> Hey,
> there is a typo on /cvs/www/rpki-client/portable.html
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
Index: rpki-client-portable.html.head
===
RCS file:
Thank you much.
Do you mean i should not do syspatch if a modified kernel sources?
When reading KARL notes i tough that it only incompatible with kernel
changed
with config -e or kernel configuration file, which i did not modified.
What about kernel relinking at boot time?
Kernel changes was work
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:21:13AM +0300, Bars Bars wrote:
> it seems i figured out why userland was 'broken' on recompiled kernel
> with changed RT_TABLEID_MAX.
> I dont think things are really broken, may be i dont them right way, please
> advice.
>
> I could reproduce the issue (all steps are d
as i understand, kernel relinking currently used object file and installs
new kernel.
what i do not understand is how could it 'rollback' kernel changes done
during compilation,
if it using current object files which arre built during compilation.
Just one note, i not yet rebooted after re-linking
Hi everyone!
I noticed facette became broken in 6.7. Do you guys use any neat tool to graph
collectd RRDs? Preferrably in ports or at most something git-pullable but with
no outside deps (relative to base or ports).
Thanks for the input!
Dani
Happy birthday Theo!
On your 22nd anniversary of releasing OpenBSD 2.3
Cheers,
--
Craig Skinner | http://linkd.in/yGqkv7
it seems i figured out why userland was 'broken' on recompiled kernel
with changed RT_TABLEID_MAX.
I dont think things are really broken, may be i dont them right way, please
advice.
I could reproduce the issue (all steps are done exactly as in openbsd.org
faq).
I changed RT_TABLEID_MAX, recompile
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 9:10 AM Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Before I wrote this email I searched under marc.info and did a google search,
> but I didn't get a definitive answer. I found this under openbsd.org:
>
> https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
>
> Whoever put that together I thank t
Hi,
Before I wrote this email I searched under marc.info and did a google search,
but I didn't get a definitive answer. I found this under openbsd.org:
https://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
Whoever put that together I thank thee.
In code, I see the (c) and the (C) used interchangibly, I'm wonder
27 matches
Mail list logo