Man, it goes to show you that with complex systems it's still worth
reporting potential bugs even with heavily used utilities.
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 2:23 PM Brian Brombacher
wrote:
>
> > On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Brian Brombacher
> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm...
> >
> > /bin/ls, a utility that has
On 1/7/20 10:05 pm, Luke Small wrote:
> Are you clinging to traditions for some purpose?
Are you posting random pieces of code and asking for critique on them
for no apparent reason for some purpose?
To be clear, this was the sum and total of your first message in this
thread (excluding
On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
> whereas GNU coreutils will not, is this expected behaviour or a bug?
>
Funny, because this seems
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> Hmm...
>
> /bin/ls, a utility that has existed since 1960’s.
>
> This is not a bug.
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ls
>
Please disregard this poor advice. Obviously this isn’t the 1960’s and it
ain’t the same code :)
There
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 02:16:29PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 20:59:08 +0200, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>
> > Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
> > OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
> > whereas GNU coreutils will
I’ll be explicit.
Did the OP run ls(1) as superuser? See -A flag in man ls
We have no idea.
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Ottavio Caruso
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
On Sat, 04 Jul 2020 20:59:08 +0200, Richard Ipsum wrote:
> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
> whereas GNU coreutils will not, is this expected behaviour or a bug?
I think this is actually a
On 2020-07-04, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
>> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
>> whereas GNU coreutils will not, is this expected
Henry Bonath writes:
> I would like to chime in here and confirm that I am seeing very
> similar behavior with HAProxy on OpenBSD 6.7,
> I was preparing to create my own post on this issue until I saw your thread.
> I too believe this is a bug.
We saw the same thing after upgrading our proxy host
Happy Birthday Austin
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 9:08 AM Austin Hook wrote:
>
> Just noticed your post about, among other things, the old big puffy
> wireframe stickers. Nice story about getting back into OpenBSD.
>
> There are quite a few of those stickers left over from the old days, when
>
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:38 PM, Ottavio Caruso
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2020 at 19:59, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
>> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
>> whereas GNU coreutils
Hmm...
/bin/ls, a utility that has existed since 1960’s.
This is not a bug.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ls
> On Jul 4, 2020, at 3:02 PM, Richard Ipsum wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
> OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden"
Hi,
Output of ls -R between OpenBSD and GNU coreutils seems to differ,
OpenBSD ls -R will apparently list "hidden" directories like .git,
whereas GNU coreutils will not, is this expected behaviour or a bug?
Thanks,
Richard
Just noticed your post about, among other things, the old big puffy
wireframe stickers. Nice story about getting back into OpenBSD.
There are quite a few of those stickers left over from the old days, when
we ran the first version of the OpenBSD store. Lifetime warrantee on
anything we
> On Jul 3, 2020, at 7:17 PM, Henry Bonath wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to test this out.
> I just reloaded a test machine from scratch with -current and
> installed the HAProxy 2.0.15-4f39279 package.
> I loaded a very basic config file, and am also seeing the same
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 4:28 PM, Toyam Cox wrote:
>
> Hello Misc,
>
> Full config at end of email.
>
> I've discussed the below in #openbsd on freenode, and was told to come
> here. At present, I have a setup where I need multiple unrelated
> servers under a single IP address. I used relayd
On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:07:35AM -0400, Brian Brombacher wrote:
>
> >> On Jul 1, 2020, at 1:14 PM, gwes wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/1/20 8:05 AM, Luke Small wrote:
> >> I spoke to my favorite university computer science professor who said
> >> ++n is faster than n++ because the function needs to
>> On Jul 1, 2020, at 1:14 PM, gwes wrote:
>>
>> On 7/1/20 8:05 AM, Luke Small wrote:
>> I spoke to my favorite university computer science professor who said
>> ++n is faster than n++ because the function needs to store the initial
>> value, increment, then return the stored value in the
> On Jul 3, 2020, at 3:34 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My setup in relayd is like this:
>
> redirect radius {
> listen on $radius_addr udp port radius interface $ext_if
> pftag RELAYD_radius
> sticky-address
> forward to mode least-states check icmp demote carp
> }
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
