Apologies if this is unnecessary sending of this, but I sent this to
the tech OpenBSD mailing list (which might've not been the right list)
so I'm re-sending it to this one just in case. (It might've gotten
lost too.) The original email is below:
So I've really wanted to try OpenBSD in a
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:13:38PM -0400, Brennan Vincent wrote:
> I do not know how to write wifi drivers, but I am willing to donate hardware
> or other resources if that would be helpful to someone. Please contact me if
> so.
I have a WIP driver which loads firmware but it can neither scan
I do not know how to write wifi drivers, but I am willing to donate
hardware or other resources if that would be helpful to someone. Please
contact me if so.
KAWAMATA Yoshihiro wrote:
> When I was looking at the snapshot package, I found that /usr/bin/ld
> and /usr/bin/ld.lld have the same contents and properties, but they
> are independent.
>
> Upon further investigation, it seems that this is due to the fact that
> /usr/bin/ld is contained in
KAWAMATA Yoshihiro wrote:
> When I was looking at the snapshot package, I found that /usr/bin/ld
> and /usr/bin/ld.lld have the same contents and properties, but they
> are independent.
>
> Upon further investigation, it seems that this is due to the fact that
> /usr/bin/ld is contained in
Hi,
When I was looking at the snapshot package, I found that /usr/bin/ld
and /usr/bin/ld.lld have the same contents and properties, but they
are independent.
Upon further investigation, it seems that this is due to the fact that
/usr/bin/ld is contained in base69.tgz and /usr/bin/ld.ld is
On 23/03/2021 05:53, misopolemiac wrote:
I'd appreciate some pointers to documentation or minimal examples of
the 3-process privilege separation model for OpenBSD's daemons.
Internet searches pointed to skeleton examples at
github.com/krwesterback/newd and github.com/krwesterback/newdctl, but
On 2021-03-22, Szél Gábor wrote:
> Dear List!
>
> We make some tests, i think this is intel em driver (82571EB) bug!
>
> * if i move aggr0 from em devices to bnx devices, everything will be fine!
> (only change trunkport from em to bnx)
> * if i change intel network card to other intel
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:43:09AM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> I have a removable disk that I want to auto-mount. However, it may not
> always be present. If I put an entry in fstab for it, will the system be
> able to cope even if the disk is not present?
>
> Is there a better way
I'd appreciate some pointers to documentation or minimal examples of
the 3-process privilege separation model for OpenBSD's daemons.
Internet searches pointed to skeleton examples at
github.com/krwesterback/newd and github.com/krwesterback/newdctl, but
those repos are now dead and it's unclear how
Hi,
thanks for the insightful article, I also really liked the VRF OpenVPN
guide, I'll try to implement it with my VPN provider some day...
I think you've got some really good content going on on your blog.
Best regards
Kristjan Komlosi
On 3/21/21 6:34 PM, Lari Huttunen wrote:
All,
I wrote
Dear List!
We make some tests, i think this is intel em driver (82571EB) bug!
* if i move aggr0 from em devices to bnx devices, everything will be fine!
(only change trunkport from em to bnx)
* if i change intel network card to other intel network card with
82571EB chipset, not working.
Hey Mark, I don't have an X1C so I can't offer any hardware-specific advice,
but I see you're using the ZZZ command to hibernate the system, yet it appears
you want to suspend the system (based on wording). Have you tested zzz
(lowercase) instead? Maybe your hardware/setup doesn't support
13 matches
Mail list logo